These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28185280)
1. Research Protocols Offer a Glimpse Into Evidence in the Making. Kearney MH Res Nurs Health; 2017 Apr; 40(2):93-95. PubMed ID: 28185280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Moving nursing beyond pā<ā0.05. Hayat MJ; Staggs VS; Schwartz TA; Higgins M; Azuero A; Budhathoki C; Chandrasekhar R; Cook P; Cramer E; Dietrich MS; Garnier-Villarreal M; Hanlon A; He J; Hu J; Kim M; Mueller M; Nolan JR; Perkhounkova Y; Rothers J; Schluck G; Su X; Templin TN; Weaver MT; Yang Q; Ye S Res Nurs Health; 2019 Aug; 42(4):244-245. PubMed ID: 31250931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity and reliability--What's it all about? Part 1. Validity in quantitative studies. Twycross A; Shields L Paediatr Nurs; 2004 Nov; 16(9):28. PubMed ID: 15633276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Appropriate use of pilot studies. Perry SE J Nurs Scholarsh; 2001; 33(2):107. PubMed ID: 11439935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Critiquing research for use in practice. Dale JC J Pediatr Health Care; 2005; 19(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 15867836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Capturing Family Complexity in Family Nursing Research and Practice. Russell LT J Fam Nurs; 2020 Nov; 26(4):287-293. PubMed ID: 33283611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The operations manual: a mechanism for improving the research process. Bowman A; Wyman JF; Peters J Nurs Res; 2002; 51(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 11984385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reporting on surveys: information for authors and peer reviewers. Huston P CMAJ; 1996 Jun; 154(11):1695-704. PubMed ID: 8646657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A focus on case reports. Hooper VD J Perianesth Nurs; 2007 Oct; 22(5):301-2. PubMed ID: 17900501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability and validity in research. Roberts P; Priest H Nurs Stand; 2006 Jul 12-18; 20(44):41-5. PubMed ID: 16872117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Instruments and methods of research]. Riv Inferm; 1997; 16(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 9510825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diaries as a data collection strategy. Jarrett M J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2000 Mar; 27(2):92. PubMed ID: 10729179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Editorial standards of quality: examining patterns of health in scholarly publishing. Chinn PL ANS Adv Nurs Sci; 2015; 38(1):1. PubMed ID: 25635499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cultural considerations and issues in measurement. Strickland OL J Nurs Meas; 2003; 11(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 15132007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The research critique. General criteria for evaluating a research report. Beck CT J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1990; 19(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 2299438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Case study: design? Method? Or comprehensive strategy? Jones C; Lyons C Nurse Res; 2004; 11(3):70-6. PubMed ID: 15065485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Making Dissertations Publishable. Kearney MH Res Nurs Health; 2017 Feb; 40(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 27891630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Finding and evaluating potential research instruments. Koop PM Can Oncol Nurs J; 2003; 13(4):207-8. PubMed ID: 14692363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]