136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 281854)
1. A comparative cytologic study of 100 urine specimens processed by the slide centrifuge and membrane filter techniques.
Marwah S; Devlin D; Dekker A
Acta Cytol; 1978; 22(5):431-4. PubMed ID: 281854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in specimen preparation method may impact urine cytologic evaluation.
Voss JS; Kipp BR; Krueger AK; Clayton AC; Halling KC; Karnes RJ; Henry MR; Sebo TJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Sep; 130(3):428-33. PubMed ID: 18701417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A technique to prepare cytologic filter slides from solid tissue.
Kington E; Tweeddale DN
Acta Cytol; 1975; 19(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 47679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of ThinPrep UroCyte and cytospin slide preparations for gastrointestinal specimens: evaluation and retrospective performance review.
Smith GD; Chadwick BE; Adler DG; Bentz JS
Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Dec; 38(12):902-12. PubMed ID: 21104738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cell yield obtained with various cytopreparatory techniques for urinary cytology.
Beyer-Boon ME; Voorn-den Hollander MJ
Acta Cytol; 1978; 22(6):589-93. PubMed ID: 83772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The diagnostic value of flow cytometric DNA analysis in bladder cancer--comparison with conventional cytology].
Kawasaki T
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1991 Nov; 37(11):1481-9. PubMed ID: 1767770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combination of cytologic evaluation and quantitative digital cytometry is reliable in detecting recurrent disease in patients with urinary diversions.
Caraway NP; Khanna A; Payne L; Kamat AM; Katz RL
Cancer; 2007 Oct; 111(5):323-9. PubMed ID: 17721991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Urinary cytology: device capabilities and requirements.
Koss LG; Bartels PH
Anal Quant Cytol; 1980; 2(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 6990848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Suspicious urine cytology (class III) in patients with bladder cancer: should it be considered as negative or positive?
Raitanen MP; Aine RA; Kaasinen ES; Liukkonen TJ; Kylmälä TM; Huhtala H; Tammela TL;
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2002; 36(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 12201938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative diagnostic value of urine cytology, UBC-ELISA, and fluorescence in situ hybridization for detection of transitional cell carcinoma of urinary bladder in routine clinical practice.
May M; Hakenberg OW; Gunia S; Pohling P; Helke C; Lübbe L; Nowack R; Siegsmund M; Hoschke B
Urology; 2007 Sep; 70(3):449-53. PubMed ID: 17688921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of the Conventional Centrifuged and Filtrated Preparations in Urine Cytology].
Sekita N; Shimosakai H; Nishikawa R; Sato H; Kouno H; Fujimura M; Mikami K
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2016 Mar; 62(3):111-6. PubMed ID: 27133882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experience with cytologic examination of urines with the assistance of multiple parallel methods with and without clinical indication of tumor.
Levy E; Jerusalem K
Acta Cytol; 1973; 17(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 4120550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic significance of 'atypia' in instrumented versus voided urine specimens.
Kapur U; Venkataraman G; Wojcik EM
Cancer; 2008 Aug; 114(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 18548527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic classification of urothelial cells in urine cytology specimens using exclusively spectral information.
Jaganath R; Angeletti C; Levenson R; Rimm DL
Cancer; 2004 Jun; 102(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 15211478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization assay detects transitional cell carcinoma in the majority of patients with bladder cancer and atypical or negative urine cytology.
Skacel M; Fahmy M; Brainard JA; Pettay JD; Biscotti CV; Liou LS; Procop GW; Jones JS; Ulchaker J; Zippe CD; Tubbs RR
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2101-5. PubMed ID: 12771727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Collection fluid helps preservation in voided urine cytology.
Raistrick J; Shambayati B; Dunsmuir W
Cytopathology; 2008 Apr; 19(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 18352862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utility of millipore filter and cell block in thyroid needle aspirates: which method is superior?
Nassar A; Cohen C; Siddiqui MT
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Jan; 35(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 17173291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of cellular recovery rates and morphologic detail obtained using membrane filter and cytocentrifuge techniques.
Barrett DL; King EB
Acta Cytol; 1976; 20(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 1065177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The dilemma of suspicious urine cytology in patients being followed for bladder cancer.
Raitanen MP; Aine R; Kylmälä T; Kallio J; Liukkonen T; Tammela T;
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 2001; 90(4):256-9. PubMed ID: 11820413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical study of urinary cytology: with special reference to bladder cancer].
Nemoto S; Ishikawa S; Takeshima H; Iizumi T; Uchida K; Yazaki T; Nemoto R; Rinsho K; Kano S
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1983 Dec; 29(12):1611-5. PubMed ID: 6677108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
