These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28185440)

  • 21. Influence of illuminants on the color distribution of shade guides.
    Park JH; Lee YK; Lim BS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):402-11. PubMed ID: 17174657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A novel sample design for determining color compatibility between layered resin composite and vita shade guides.
    Ismail EH; Dawson DV; Maia RR
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Jan; 32(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 31565829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of self shade matching ability of dental students using visual and instrumental means.
    Alsaleh S; Labban M; AlHariri M; Tashkandi E
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40 Suppl 1():e82-7. PubMed ID: 22306532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality?
    Haddad HJ; Jakstat HA; Arnetzl G; Borbely J; Vichi A; Dumfahrt H; Renault P; Corcodel N; Pohlen B; Marada G; de Parga JA; Reshad M; Klinke TU; Hannak WB; Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e40-4. PubMed ID: 19520478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Effect of Color Training of Dental Students' on Dental Shades Matching Quality.
    Alfouzan AF; Alqahtani HM; Tashkandi EA
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Sep; 29(5):346-351. PubMed ID: 28127849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Color differences: polymerized composite and corresponding Vitapan Classical shade tab.
    Browning WD; Contreras-Bulnes R; Brackett MG; Brackett WW
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e34-9. PubMed ID: 19500895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Implementation of Elaborative Feedback for Qualitative Improvement of Shade Matching-A Randomized Study.
    Olms C; Jakstat HA; Haak R
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2016 Sep; 28(5):277-286. PubMed ID: 27534729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols.
    Della Bona A; Barrett AA; Rosa V; Pinzetta C
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):276-81. PubMed ID: 19019420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Metameric effect between natural teeth and the shade tabs of a shade guide.
    Corcodel N; Helling S; Rammelsberg P; Hassel AJ
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2010 Jun; 118(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 20572867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. New shade guide for evaluation of tooth whitening--colorimetric study.
    Paravina RD; Johnston WM; Powers JM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):276-83; discussion 283. PubMed ID: 17877628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dental Shade Matching and Value Discernment Abilities of First-Year Dental Students.
    Imbery TA; Tran D; Baechle MA; Hankle JL; Janus C
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Dec; 27(9):821-827. PubMed ID: 29533495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system.
    Öngül D; Şermet B; Balkaya MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jul; 108(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 22765984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Shade matching assisted by digital photography and computer software.
    Schropp L
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 19141046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Performance assessment of dental shade guides.
    Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e15-20. PubMed ID: 19329240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. New shade guide for tooth whitening monitoring: visual assessment.
    Paravina RD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 18319088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Colour parameters and shade correspondence of CAD-CAM ceramic systems.
    Della Bona A; Pecho OE; Ghinea R; Cardona JC; Pérez MM
    J Dent; 2015 Jun; 43(6):726-34. PubMed ID: 25748670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Factors influencing the shade matching performance of dentists and dental technicians when using two different shade guides.
    Alomari M; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2011 Dec; 211(11):E23. PubMed ID: 22158197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Proposal for a gingival shade guide based on
    Gomez Polo C; Montero J; Martin Casado AM
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2019 Oct; 11(5):239-246. PubMed ID: 31754413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of Three Shade-matching Devices in Replicating the Shade of Metal Ceramic Restorations: An in vitro Study.
    Lakhanpal S; Neelima MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1003-1008. PubMed ID: 27965487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Comparison of shade matching accuracy of tabs of shadeguide and tabs out of shadeguide].
    Xu MM; Xu TK; Liu F; Ren SX; Feng HL
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jul; 44(7):430-2. PubMed ID: 19957578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.