These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 281855)

  • 21. [Comparative evaluation of the physicomechanical properties of Soviet cements used for attaching fixed prostheses].
    Karal'nik DM; Sevost'ianov DG; Chechina GN; Gagarina LM
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1981; 60(5):67-8. PubMed ID: 6947535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of luting agents on the retention and marginal adaptation of the CeraOne implant system.
    Clayton GH; Driscoll CF; Hondrum SO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(5):660-5. PubMed ID: 9337028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Adaption of luting cement to enamel, dentin and restorative material.
    Oilo G
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1978; 36(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 354310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Characteristics of dental cements and their use].
    Ishikawa T
    Shiyo; 1983 Sep; 31(9):11-7. PubMed ID: 6593547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical considerations in cement selection for provisional restorations--Part I.
    Sadan A
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 12(7):638. PubMed ID: 11404991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Retentive strength of internal cast restorations after applying repeated impacts].
    Ozawa M
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1988 Jan; 14(1):127-39. PubMed ID: 3255204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
    Squier RS; Agar JR; Duncan JP; Taylor TD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A practical comparison of the three basic types of crown and bridge cements.
    Hayes SM
    J Acad Gen Dent; 1973; 21(5):18-9. PubMed ID: 4519326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In vitro push-out strength of seven luting agents to dentin.
    Cheylan JM; Gonthier S; Degrange M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 12170851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of surface roughness on the retentive ability of two dental luting cements.
    Oilo G; Jørgensen KD
    J Oral Rehabil; 1978 Oct; 5(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 361933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Retentive properties of five different luting cements on base and noble metal copings.
    Ergin S; Gemalmaz D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 12473998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Retentive [correction of Preventive] efficacy of glass ionomer, zinc phosphate and zinc polycarboxylate luting cements in preformed stainless steel crowns: a comparative clinical study.
    Khinda VI; Grewal N
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2002 Jun; 20(2):41-6. PubMed ID: 12435014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Changes in retention strength of luting cements by repeated loading].
    Kakigawa H; Yokoyama Y; Tajima K; Hayashi I; Kozono Y
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1989 Nov; 8(6):783-9. PubMed ID: 2489593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Retentive properties of luting cements: an in vitro investigation.
    Dahl BL; Oilo G
    Dent Mater; 1986 Feb; 2(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 3519330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of cleansing procedures on the retentive ability of two luting cements to ground dentin in vitro.
    Dahl BL
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1978; 36(3):137-42. PubMed ID: 354309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cements for permanent luting: a summarizing review.
    Going RE; Mitchem JC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1975 Jul; 91(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 1094050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Proportioning and mixing of cements: a comparison of working times.
    Eames WB; Monroe SD; Roan JD; O'Neal SJ
    Oper Dent; 1977; 2(3):97-104. PubMed ID: 282594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of three cavity base materials under amalgam restorations.
    Gourley JM; Rose DE
    J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1972 Nov; 38(11):406-10. PubMed ID: 4508947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The properties of four dental cements.
    Stevens L
    Aust Dent J; 1975 Dec; 20(6):361-7. PubMed ID: 769762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vivo evaluation of marginal leakage of four inlay cements.
    Andrews JT; Hembree JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1976 May; 35(5):532-7. PubMed ID: 1063869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.