These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28186034)

  • 1. Better Data Quality for Better Healthcare Research Results - A Case Study.
    Hart R; Kuo MH
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 234():161-166. PubMed ID: 28186034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the data completeness in the Electronic Health Record after the Implementation of an Outpatient Electronic Health Record.
    Soto M; Capurro D; Catalán S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():885. PubMed ID: 26262187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Business Rules to Improve Secondary Data Use of Electronic Healthcare Systems.
    Blaisure J; Ceusters W
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 235():303-307. PubMed ID: 28423803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Data Quality in Electronic Health Records Research: Quality Domains and Assessment Methods.
    Feder SL
    West J Nurs Res; 2018 May; 40(5):753-766. PubMed ID: 28322657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability study of clinical electronic records with paper records in the NSW Public Oral Health Service.
    Masoe AV; Blinkhorn AS; Colyvas K; Taylor J; Blinkhorn FA
    Public Health Res Pract; 2015 Mar; 25(2):e2521519. PubMed ID: 25848737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring the business case for ambulatory electronic health record system adoption.
    Song PH; McAlearney AS; Robbins J; McCullough JS
    J Healthc Manag; 2011; 56(3):169-80; discussion 181-2. PubMed ID: 21714372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From Computer-interpretable Guidelines to Computer-interpretable Quality Indicators: A Case for an Ontology.
    White P; Roudsari A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 202():99-102. PubMed ID: 25000025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The SAFER guides: empowering organizations to improve the safety and effectiveness of electronic health records.
    Sittig DF; Ash JS; Singh H
    Am J Manag Care; 2014 May; 20(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 25181570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Best practices for EHR implementation: A BC First Nations community's experience.
    Wilkinson S; Borycki E; Kushniruk A
    Healthc Manage Forum; 2020 Jan; 33(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 31370716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trend: EHR optimization. Post-implementation advancements. Leaders from various healthcare organizations explain how they have been moving forward with their EHRs following implementation.
    Leventhal R
    Healthc Inform; 2014 Mar; 31(2):30-2. PubMed ID: 24812989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Cost of Quality in Diabetes.
    Ghany A; Keshavjee K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 234():131-135. PubMed ID: 28186029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. At the crossroads: NRTRC white paper examines trends driving the convergence of telehealth, EHRs and HIE.
    Thielst CB
    World Hosp Health Serv; 2010; 46(4):17-23. PubMed ID: 21391447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A cross-sectional survey exploring attitudes towards provincial electronic health record implementation among clients attending the Provincial Sexually Transmitted Infections Clinic in British Columbia.
    Pedersen H; Taylor D; Gilbert M; Achen M; Lester R; Ogilvie G
    Sex Transm Infect; 2015 Feb; 91(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 25480149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient and public attitudes towards informed consent models and levels of awareness of Electronic Health Records in the UK.
    Riordan F; Papoutsi C; Reed JE; Marston C; Bell D; Majeed A
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Apr; 84(4):237-47. PubMed ID: 25649841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk assessment of integrated electronic health records.
    Bjornsson BT; Sigurdardottir G; Stefansson SO
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 155():78-84. PubMed ID: 20543313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based management of ambulatory electronic health record system implementation: an assessment of conceptual support and qualitative evidence.
    McAlearney AS; Hefner JL; Sieck C; Rizer M; Huerta TR
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Jul; 83(7):484-94. PubMed ID: 24862893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Curating and Integrating Data from Multiple Sources to Support Healthcare Analytics.
    Ng K; Kakkanatt C; Benigno M; Thompson C; Jackson M; Cahan A; Zhu X; Zhang P; Huang P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():1056. PubMed ID: 26262355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Redesigning care delivery through health IT implementation. Exploring Trinity Health's IT model.
    Crandall DK; Brokel JM; Schwichtenberg T; Henderson S; Haskins R; Wakefield D; Ward M; Dixon BE
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2007; 21(4):41-8. PubMed ID: 19195280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Data quality of an electronic health record tool to support VA cardiac catheterization laboratory quality improvement: the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking System for Cath Labs (CART) program.
    Byrd JB; Vigen R; Plomondon ME; Rumsfeld JS; Box TL; Fihn SD; Maddox TM
    Am Heart J; 2013 Mar; 165(3):434-40. PubMed ID: 23453115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Initializing a hospital-wide data quality program. The AP-HP experience.
    Daniel C; Serre P; Orlova N; Bréant S; Paris N; Griffon N
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Nov; 181():104804. PubMed ID: 30497872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.