BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28186040)

  • 1. Low-Cost Rapid Usability Testing: Its Application in Both Product Development and System Implementation.
    Kushniruk A; Borycki E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 234():195-200. PubMed ID: 28186040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A framework for evaluating electronic health record vendor user-centered design and usability testing processes.
    Ratwani RM; Zachary Hettinger A; Kosydar A; Fairbanks RJ; Hodgkins ML
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Apr; 24(e1):e35-e39. PubMed ID: 27375292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effective Usability Engineering in Healthcare: A Vision of Usable and Safer Healthcare IT.
    Kushniruk A; Senathirajah Y; Borycki E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 245():1066-1069. PubMed ID: 29295265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Commercial versus in-situ usability testing of healthcare information systems: towards "public" usability testing in healthcare organizations.
    Kushniruk AW; Borycki EM; Kannry J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 183():157-61. PubMed ID: 23388274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Emerging approaches to usability evaluation of health information systems: towards in-situ analysis of complex healthcare systems and environments.
    Kushniruk AW; Borycki EM; Kuwata S; Kannry J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 169():915-9. PubMed ID: 21893879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low-cost rapid usability engineering: designing and customizing usable healthcare information systems.
    Kushniruk AW; Borycki EM
    Healthc Q; 2006; 9(4):98-100, 102. PubMed ID: 17076383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ten factors to consider when developing usability scenarios and tasks for health information technology.
    Russ AL; Saleem JJ
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Feb; 78():123-133. PubMed ID: 29329702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Approaches to Demonstrating the Effectiveness and Impact of Usability Testing of Healthcare Information Technology.
    Kushniruk A; Hall S; Baylis T; Borycki E; Kannry J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019; 257():244-249. PubMed ID: 30741203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interface Usability Across and Within EHR Vendors and Medical Settings: The Often Unexamined Need for Interface Similarities.
    Koppel R; Kuziemsky C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 234():183-187. PubMed ID: 28186038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integrating technology-centric and user-centric system testing methods: ensuring healthcare system usability and safety.
    Kushniruk A; Borycki E; Kuo MH; Kuwata S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 157():181-6. PubMed ID: 20543386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhancing the informatics evaluation toolkit with remote usability testing.
    Dixon BE
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2009 Nov; 2009():147-51. PubMed ID: 20351839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Usability Methods for Ensuring Health Information Technology Safety: Evidence-Based Approaches. Contribution of the IMIA Working Group Health Informatics for Patient Safety.
    Borycki E; Kushniruk A; Nohr C; Takeda H; Kuwata S; Carvalho C; Bainbridge M; Kannry J
    Yearb Med Inform; 2013; 8():20-7. PubMed ID: 23974544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Concise and Practical Framework for the Development and Usability Evaluation of Patient Information Websites.
    Peute LW; Knijnenburg SL; Kremer LC; Jaspers MW
    Appl Clin Inform; 2015; 6(2):383-99. PubMed ID: 26171083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring the relationship between usability and technology-induced error: unraveling a complex interaction.
    Kushniruk A; Borycki E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 166():48-56. PubMed ID: 21685610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Barriers to comparing the usability of electronic health records.
    Ratwani RM; Hettinger AZ; Fairbanks RJ
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Apr; 24(e1):e191-e193. PubMed ID: 27572813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems.
    Kushniruk AW; Patel VL
    J Biomed Inform; 2004 Feb; 37(1):56-76. PubMed ID: 15016386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Debunking health IT usability myths.
    Staggers N; Xiao Y; Chapman L
    Appl Clin Inform; 2013; 4(2):241-50. PubMed ID: 23874361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From Usability Testing to Clinical Simulations: Bringing Context into the Design and Evaluation of Usable and Safe Health Information Technologies. Contribution of the IMIA Human Factors Engineering for Healthcare Informatics Working Group.
    Kushniruk A; Nohr C; Jensen S; Borycki EM
    Yearb Med Inform; 2013; 8():78-85. PubMed ID: 23974552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards a Usability and Error "Safety Net": A Multi-Phased Multi-Method Approach to Ensuring System Usability and Safety.
    Kushniruk A; Senathirajah Y; Borycki E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 245():763-767. PubMed ID: 29295201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors.
    Ratwani RM; Fairbanks RJ; Hettinger AZ; Benda NC
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Nov; 22(6):1179-82. PubMed ID: 26049532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.