These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28186066)

  • 1. End-Users' Voice in EHR Selection: Development of a Usability Questionnaire for Demonstrations in Procurement (DPUQ).
    Tyllinen M; Kaipio J; Lääveri T; Nieminen M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 234():346-351. PubMed ID: 28186066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A framework for evaluating electronic health record vendor user-centered design and usability testing processes.
    Ratwani RM; Zachary Hettinger A; Kosydar A; Fairbanks RJ; Hodgkins ML
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Apr; 24(e1):e35-e39. PubMed ID: 27375292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Competitive Usability Evaluation of Electronic Health Records: Preliminary Results of a Case Study.
    Marcilly R; Schiro J; Heyndels L; Guerlinger S; Pigot A; Pelayo S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2021 May; 281():834-838. PubMed ID: 34042791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Framework for Usability Evaluation in EHR Procurement.
    Tyllinen M; Kaipio J; Lääveri T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2018; 247():446-450. PubMed ID: 29678000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors.
    Ratwani RM; Fairbanks RJ; Hettinger AZ; Benda NC
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Nov; 22(6):1179-82. PubMed ID: 26049532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Barriers to comparing the usability of electronic health records.
    Ratwani RM; Hettinger AZ; Fairbanks RJ
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Apr; 24(e1):e191-e193. PubMed ID: 27572813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland.
    Kaipio J; Lääveri T; Hyppönen H; Vainiomäki S; Reponen J; Kushniruk A; Borycki E; Vänskä J
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():266-281. PubMed ID: 27919385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. User Satisfaction with Recently Deployed Electronic Health Records.
    Lintvedt O; Marco-Ruiz L; Pedersen R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2023 May; 302():192-196. PubMed ID: 37203645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Usability Analysis of Contending Electronic Health Record Systems.
    Tyllinen M; Kaipio J; Lääveri T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019; 257():430-435. PubMed ID: 30741235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the usability of speech recognition to create clinical documentation using a commercial electronic health record.
    Hodgson T; Magrabi F; Coiera E
    Int J Med Inform; 2018 May; 113():38-42. PubMed ID: 29602431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physicians' and nurses' experiences on EHR usability: Comparison between the professional groups by employment sector and system brand.
    Kaipio J; Kuusisto A; Hyppönen H; Heponiemi T; Lääveri T
    Int J Med Inform; 2020 Feb; 134():104018. PubMed ID: 31835158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advancing electronic health record vendor usability maturity: Progress and next steps.
    Hettinger AZ; Melnick ER; Ratwani RM
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Apr; 28(5):1029-1031. PubMed ID: 33517394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.
    Yoo S; Kim S; Lee S; Lee KH; Baek RM; Hwang H
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 22959193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physicians' Perspectives on EHR Usability: Results from Four Large Cross-Sectional Surveys from 2010 to 2021.
    Lääveri T; Viitanen J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2023 Jun; 304():16-20. PubMed ID: 37347562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task-specific usability requirements of electronic medical records systems: Lessons learned from a national survey of end-users.
    Farzandipour M; Meidani Z; Riazi H; Sadeqi Jabali M
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2018 Sep; 43(3):280-299. PubMed ID: 28398097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Navigation in the electronic health record: A review of the safety and usability literature.
    Roman LC; Ancker JS; Johnson SB; Senathirajah Y
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 Mar; 67():69-79. PubMed ID: 28088527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Better Bridges, Better Systems.
    Berlin J
    Tex Med; 2015 Sep; 111(9):39-43. PubMed ID: 26360338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Usability Testing of Two Ambulatory EHR Navigators.
    Hultman G; Marquard J; Arsoniadis E; Mink P; Rizvi R; Ramer T; Khairat S; Fickau K; Melton GB
    Appl Clin Inform; 2016; 7(2):502-15. PubMed ID: 27437057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What do electronic health record vendors reveal about their products: an analysis of vendor websites.
    Yeung NK; Jadad AR; Shachak A
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Feb; 15(2):e36. PubMed ID: 23422722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the User Experience with Discount Site-Specific User Testing.
    Pierce RP; Eskridge BR; Ross B; Day MA; Dean B; Belden JL
    Appl Clin Inform; 2022 Oct; 13(5):1040-1052. PubMed ID: 36323335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.