These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28186420)

  • 1. Driving While Interacting With Google Glass: Investigating the Combined Effect of Head-Up Display and Hands-Free Input on Driving Safety and Multitask Performance.
    Tippey KG; Sivaraj E; Ferris TK
    Hum Factors; 2017 Jun; 59(4):671-688. PubMed ID: 28186420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Texting while driving using Google Glass™: Promising but not distraction-free.
    He J; Choi W; McCarley JS; Chaparro BS; Wang C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Aug; 81():218-29. PubMed ID: 26024837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does wearable device bring distraction closer to drivers? Comparing smartphones and Google Glass.
    He J; McCarley JS; Crager K; Jadliwala M; Hua L; Huang S
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():156-166. PubMed ID: 29866306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In the eye of the beholder: A simulator study of the impact of Google Glass on driving performance.
    Young KL; Stephens AN; Stephan KL; Stuart GW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jan; 86():68-75. PubMed ID: 26519889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Texting while driving: is speech-based text entry less risky than handheld text entry?
    He J; Chaparro A; Nguyen B; Burge RJ; Crandall J; Chaparro B; Ni R; Cao S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():287-95. PubMed ID: 25089769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On-Road Evaluation of In-vehicle Interface Characteristics and Their Effects on Performance of Visual Detection on the Road and Manual Entry.
    Suh Y; Ferris TK
    Hum Factors; 2019 Feb; 61(1):105-118. PubMed ID: 30059239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Google glass: a driver distraction cause or cure?
    Sawyer BD; Finomore VS; Calvo AA; Hancock PA
    Hum Factors; 2014 Nov; 56(7):1307-21. PubMed ID: 25490810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Post and during event effect of cell phone talking and texting on driving performance--a driving simulator study.
    Thapa R; Codjoe J; Ishak S; McCarter KS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 25288040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Driving and side task performance: the effects of display clutter, separation, and modality.
    Horrey WJ; Wickens CD
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):611-24. PubMed ID: 15709324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of texting on driving performance in a driving simulator: the influence of driver age.
    Rumschlag G; Palumbo T; Martin A; Head D; George R; Commissaris RL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jan; 74():145-9. PubMed ID: 25463954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Driving while using a smartphone-based mobility application: Evaluating the impact of three multi-choice user interfaces on visual-manual distraction.
    Louveton N; McCall R; Koenig V; Avanesov T; Engel T
    Appl Ergon; 2016 May; 54():196-204. PubMed ID: 26851479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effects of Cell Phone and Text Message Conversations on Simulated Street Crossing.
    Banducci SE; Ward N; Gaspar JG; Schab KR; Crowell JA; Kaczmarski H; Kramer AF
    Hum Factors; 2016 Feb; 58(1):150-62. PubMed ID: 26490442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-modal demands of a smartphone used to place calls and enter addresses during highway driving relative to two embedded systems.
    Reimer B; Mehler B; Reagan I; Kidd D; Dobres J
    Ergonomics; 2016 Dec; 59(12):1565-1585. PubMed ID: 27110964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual and cognitive demands of manual and voice-based driving mode implementations on smartphones.
    Monk C; Sall R; Lester BD; Stephen Higgins J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jul; 187():107033. PubMed ID: 37099998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of voice technology on test track driving performance: implications for driver distraction.
    Ranney TA; Harbluk JL; Noy YI
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(2):439-54. PubMed ID: 16170949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing the demands of destination entry using Google Glass and the Samsung Galaxy S4 during simulated driving.
    Beckers N; Schreiner S; Bertrand P; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():25-34. PubMed ID: 27633195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of drinking, texting, and eating on simulated driving performance.
    Irwin C; Monement S; Desbrow B
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(2):116-23. PubMed ID: 24828121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distraction "Hangover": Characterization of the Delayed Return to Baseline Driving Risk After Distracting Behaviors.
    Snider J; Spence RJ; Engler AM; Moran R; Hacker S; Chukoskie L; Townsend J; Hill L
    Hum Factors; 2023 Mar; 65(2):306-320. PubMed ID: 33908806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do we really need to use our smartphones while driving?
    Musicant O; Lotan T; Albert G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Dec; 85():13-21. PubMed ID: 26364139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Driver performance while texting: even a little is too much.
    McKeever JD; Schultheis MT; Padmanaban V; Blasco A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 23343021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.