These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28186420)

  • 41. The Attentional Demand of Automobile Driving Revisited: Occlusion Distance as a Function of Task-Relevant Event Density in Realistic Driving Scenarios.
    Kujala T; Mäkelä J; Kotilainen I; Tokkonen T
    Hum Factors; 2016 Feb; 58(1):163-80. PubMed ID: 26238120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluating secondary input devices to support an automotive touchscreen HMI: A cross-cultural simulator study conducted in the UK and China.
    Large DR; Burnett G; Crundall E; Lawson G; Skrypchuk L; Mouzakitis A
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jul; 78():184-196. PubMed ID: 31046950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Functional requirements of automotive head-up displays: A systematic review of literature from 1994 to present.
    Park J; Park W
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Apr; 76():130-146. PubMed ID: 30642518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The smartphone and the driver's cognitive workload: A comparison of Apple, Google, and Microsoft's intelligent personal assistants.
    Strayer DL; Cooper JM; Turrill J; Coleman JR; Hopman RJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Jun; 71(2):93-110. PubMed ID: 28604047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Driver Behavior and Performance with Augmented Reality Pedestrian Collision Warning: An Outdoor User Study.
    Kim H; Gabbard JL; Anon AM; Misu T
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2018 Apr; 24(4):1515-1524. PubMed ID: 29543169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of a color gradient and emoji in AR-HUD warning interfaces in autonomous vehicles on takeover performance and driver emotions.
    Yu K; Du D; Yu D; Zhi J; Wang Y; Jing C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(5):714-723. PubMed ID: 38634776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The impact of distraction mitigation strategies on driving performance.
    Donmez B; Boyle LN; Lee JD
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(4):785-804. PubMed ID: 17240725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Potential benefits and costs of concurrent task engagement to maintain vigilance: a driving simulator investigation.
    Atchley P; Chan M
    Hum Factors; 2011 Feb; 53(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 21469529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Investigating the influence of working memory capacity when driving behavior is combined with cognitive load: An LCT study of young novice drivers.
    Ross V; Jongen EM; Wang W; Brijs T; Brijs K; Ruiter RA; Wets G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():377-87. PubMed ID: 23915472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Isolating the Effect of Off-Road Glance Duration on Driving Performance: An Exemplar Study Comparing HDD and HUD in Different Driving Scenarios.
    Smith M; Bagalkotkar K; Gabbard JL; Large DR; Burnett G
    Hum Factors; 2023 Aug; 65(5):833-845. PubMed ID: 34292078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Assessing driver distraction from in-vehicle information system: an on-road study exploring the effects of input modalities and secondary task types.
    Zhong Q; Zhi J; Xu Y; Gao P; Feng S
    Sci Rep; 2024 Aug; 14(1):20289. PubMed ID: 39217232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Task-Relevant Smartphone Messages Within Work Zones: A Driving Simulation Study.
    Craig CM; Tian D; Morris NL
    Hum Factors; 2024 Jun; 66(6):1786-1797. PubMed ID: 37127401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The relative impact of smartwatch and smartphone use while driving on workload, attention, and driving performance.
    Perlman D; Samost A; Domel AG; Mehler B; Dobres J; Reimer B
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Feb; 75():8-16. PubMed ID: 30509540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Continuously informing vibrotactile displays in support of attention management and multitasking in anesthesiology.
    Ferris TK; Sarter N
    Hum Factors; 2011 Dec; 53(6):600-11. PubMed ID: 22235523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Head-up displays: effects of clutter, display intensity, and display location on pilot performance.
    Ververs PM; Wickens CD
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1998; 8(4):377-403. PubMed ID: 11542276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The effects of a simulated head-up display speedometer on perceptual task performance.
    Sojourner RJ; Antin JF
    Hum Factors; 1990 Jun; 32(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 2258179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Visual Complexity of Head-Up Display in Automobiles Modulates Attentional Tunneling.
    Lee J; Lee N; Ju J; Chae J; Park J; Ryu HS; Cho YS
    Hum Factors; 2024 Jul; 66(7):1879-1892. PubMed ID: 37287261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Concurrent processing of vehicle lane keeping and speech comprehension tasks.
    Cao S; Liu Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Oct; 59():46-54. PubMed ID: 23764876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The critical tracking task: a potentially useful method to assess driver distraction?
    Petzoldt T; Bellem H; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2014 Jun; 56(4):789-808. PubMed ID: 25029903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Commercial Truck Driver Health and Safety: Exploring Distracted Driving Performance and Self-Reported Driving Skill.
    Stavrinos D; Heaton K; Welburn SC; McManus B; Griffin R; Fine PR
    Workplace Health Saf; 2016 Aug; 64(8):369-76. PubMed ID: 26809775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.