These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28187323)

  • 1. Suppressing memories of words and familiar objects results in their affective devaluation: Evidence from Think/No-think tasks.
    De Vito D; Fenske MJ
    Cognition; 2017 May; 162():1-11. PubMed ID: 28187323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural evidence that inhibition is linked to the affective devaluation of distractors that match the contents of working memory.
    De Vito D; Al-Aidroos N; Fenske MJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():259-269. PubMed ID: 28341131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cognitive-behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of the affective consequences of ignoring stimulus representations in working memory.
    De Vito D; Ferrey AE; Fenske MJ; Al-Aidroos N
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 18(3):460-475. PubMed ID: 29546688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Out of mind, out of sight: perceptual consequences of memory suppression.
    Kim K; Yi DJ
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Apr; 24(4):569-74. PubMed ID: 23459870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The affective consequences of cognitive inhibition: devaluation or neutralization?
    Frischen A; Ferrey AE; Burt DH; Pistchik M; Fenske MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):169-79. PubMed ID: 22022896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does ignoring lead to worse evaluations? A new explanation of the stimulus devaluation effect.
    Dittrich K; Klauer KC
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 21623485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distracted by cues for suppressed memories.
    Hertel PT; Hayes JA
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Jun; 26(6):775-83. PubMed ID: 25904596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inhibitory effects of thought substitution in the think/no-think task: evidence from independent cues.
    del Prete F; Hanczakowski M; Bajo MT; Mazzoni G
    Memory; 2015; 23(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 24758404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emotional devaluation in ignoring and forgetting as a function of adolescent development.
    Vivas AB; Chrysochoou E; Marful A; Bajo T
    Cognition; 2021 Jun; 211():104615. PubMed ID: 33588185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intentional forgetting in dysphoria: Investigating the inhibitory effects of thought substitution using independent cues.
    Noreen S; Ridout N
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2016 Sep; 52():110-118. PubMed ID: 27100702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inhibition does not always cause emotional devaluation: no evidence for retrieval-induced devaluation.
    Janczyk M; Wühr P
    Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(6):372-8. PubMed ID: 22851378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. It's all in the detail: intentional forgetting of autobiographical memories using the autobiographical think/no-think task.
    Noreen S; Macleod MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):375-93. PubMed ID: 22686849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cue-independent forgetting by intentional suppression - Evidence for inhibition as the mechanism of intentional forgetting.
    Wang Y; Cao Z; Zhu Z; Cai H; Wu Y
    Cognition; 2015 Oct; 143():31-5. PubMed ID: 26113446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Heart rate variability predicts control over memory retrieval.
    Gillie BL; Vasey MW; Thayer JF
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Feb; 25(2):458-65. PubMed ID: 24335601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anticipation boosts forgetting of voluntarily suppressed memories.
    Hanslmayr S; Leipold P; Bäuml KH
    Memory; 2010 Apr; 18(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 20063254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distractor devaluation in a flanker task: object-specific effects without distractor recognition memory.
    Martiny-Huenger T; Gollwitzer PM; Oettingen G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):613-25. PubMed ID: 24016067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. False memories are hard to inhibit: differential effects of directed forgetting on accurate and false recall in the DRM procedure.
    Seamon JG; Luo CR; Shulman EP; Toner SK; Caglar S
    Memory; 2002 Jul; 10(4):225-37. PubMed ID: 12097208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Moderate levels of activation lead to forgetting in the think/no-think paradigm.
    Detre GJ; Natarajan A; Gershman SJ; Norman KA
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Oct; 51(12):2371-88. PubMed ID: 23499722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Directed forgetting of recently recalled autobiographical memories.
    Barnier AJ; Conway MA; Mayoh L; Speyer J; Avizmil O; Harris CB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 May; 136(2):301-22. PubMed ID: 17500653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forgiving you is hard, but forgetting seems easy: can forgiveness facilitate forgetting?
    Noreen S; Bierman RN; MacLeod MD
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jul; 25(7):1295-302. PubMed ID: 24815607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.