These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28187729)

  • 1. Use of electronic medical records and quality of patient data: different reaction patterns of doctors and nurses to the hospital organization.
    Lambooij MS; Drewes HW; Koster F
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Feb; 17(1):17. PubMed ID: 28187729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How organizational escalation prevention potential affects success of implementation of innovations: electronic medical records in hospitals.
    Lambooij MS; Koster F
    Implement Sci; 2016 May; 11(1):75. PubMed ID: 27206920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of a nurses' views on electronic medical record systems (EMR) questionnaire in Turkish health system.
    Top M; Yilmaz A; Karabulut E; Otieno OG; Saylam M; Bakır S; Top S
    J Med Syst; 2015 Jun; 39(6):67. PubMed ID: 25957164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attitudes of Danish doctors and nurses to palliative and terminal care.
    Vejlgaard T; Addington-Hall JM
    Palliat Med; 2005 Mar; 19(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 15810750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physicians' and nurses' reactions to electronic medical records. Managerial and occupational implications.
    Darr A; Harrison MI; Shakked L; Shalom N
    J Health Organ Manag; 2003; 17(5):349-59. PubMed ID: 14628488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electronic Medical Records implementation in hospital: An empirical investigation of individual and organizational determinants.
    De Benedictis A; Lettieri E; Gastaldi L; Masella C; Urgu A; Tartaglini D
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234108. PubMed ID: 32497058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of the factors influencing healthcare professionals' adoption of mobile electronic medical record (EMR) using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in a tertiary hospital.
    Kim S; Lee KH; Hwang H; Yoo S
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Jan; 16():12. PubMed ID: 26831123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medical and nursing clinician perspectives on the usability of the hospital electronic medical record: A qualitative analysis.
    Lloyd S; Long K; Probst Y; Di Donato J; Oshni Alvandi A; Roach J; Bain C
    Health Inf Manag; 2024 Sep; 53(3):189-197. PubMed ID: 36866778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Information processing in electronic medical records: A survey validation.
    Williams C; Hamadi H; Cummings C; Zakari NMA
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Feb; 25(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 30058777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in doctors' and nurses' assessments of hospital culture and their views about computerised order entry systems.
    Callen J; Braithwaite J; Westbrook J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():15-20. PubMed ID: 18487701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Going digital: a checklist in preparing for hospital-wide electronic medical record implementation and digital transformation.
    Scott IA; Sullivan C; Staib A
    Aust Health Rev; 2019 Jul; 43(3):302-313. PubMed ID: 29792259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nurses' views on electronic medical records (EMR) in Turkey: an analysis according to use, quality and user satisfaction.
    Top M; Gider O
    J Med Syst; 2012 Jun; 36(3):1979-88. PubMed ID: 21302133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of Electronic Medical Records on Nurses' Time Allocation During Cesarean Delivery.
    Tan M; Lipman S; Lee H; Sie L; Carvalho B
    J Patient Saf; 2019 Dec; 15(4):e82-e85. PubMed ID: 29485519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of prescribing documentation by UK junior doctors undertaking psychiatry placements: a multi-centre observational study.
    Dey M; Buhagiar K; Jabbar F
    BMC Res Notes; 2019 Sep; 12(1):558. PubMed ID: 31484585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The preferences of users of electronic medical records in hospitals: quantifying the relative importance of barriers and facilitators of an innovation.
    Struik MH; Koster F; Schuit AJ; Nugteren R; Veldwijk J; Lambooij MS
    Implement Sci; 2014 Jun; 9():69. PubMed ID: 24898277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The importance of medical and nursing sub-cultures in the implementation of clinical information systems.
    Callen J; Braithwaite J; Westbrook JI
    Methods Inf Med; 2009; 48(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 19283319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Electronic Health Record Implementation in Hospitals.
    Tubaishat A
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2017 Jul; 35(7):364-372. PubMed ID: 28221186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of organizational contextual factors on physicians' attitude toward adoption of Electronic Medical Records.
    Abdekhoda M; Ahmadi M; Gohari M; Noruzi A
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Feb; 53():174-9. PubMed ID: 25445481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. First medical contact and physicians' opinion after the implementation of an electronic record system.
    Claret PG; Sebbanne M; Bobbia X; Bonnec JM; Pommet S; Jebali C; de La Coussaye JE
    Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Sep; 30(7):1235-40. PubMed ID: 22030205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of simulation training on self-efficacy of outpatient health care providers to use electronic health records.
    Vuk J; Anders ME; Mercado CC; Kennedy RL; Casella J; Steelman SC
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Jun; 84(6):423-9. PubMed ID: 25746460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.