These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28187729)

  • 21. Evaluation of a comprehensive EHR based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success: approach, results, and success factors.
    Bossen C; Jensen LG; Udsen FW
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Oct; 82(10):940-53. PubMed ID: 23827768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improving quality through effective implementation of information technology in healthcare.
    Øvretveit J; Scott T; Rundall TG; Shortell SM; Brommels M
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2007 Oct; 19(5):259-66. PubMed ID: 17717038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Interdisciplinary collaboration and the electronic medical record.
    Green SD; Thomas JD
    Pediatr Nurs; 2008; 34(3):225-7, 240. PubMed ID: 18649812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Selected determinants of the quality of hospital care. II. Managing a therapeutic team.
    Sierpińska L; Ksykiewicz-Dorota A
    Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska Med; 2002; 57(1):473-80. PubMed ID: 12898963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Factors affecting the utilisation of electronic medical records system in Malawian central hospitals.
    Mkalira Msiska KE; Kumitawa A; Kumwenda B
    Malawi Med J; 2017 Sep; 29(3):247-253. PubMed ID: 29872515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acceptance model of a Hospital Information System.
    Handayani PW; Hidayanto AN; Pinem AA; Hapsari IC; Sandhyaduhita PI; Budi I
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Mar; 99():11-28. PubMed ID: 28118918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Modeling antecedents of electronic medical record system implementation success in low-resource setting hospitals.
    Tilahun B; Fritz F
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Aug; 15():61. PubMed ID: 26231051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. What Clinical Information Is Valuable to Doctors Using Mobile Electronic Medical Records and When?
    Kim J; Lee Y; Lim S; Kim JH; Lee B; Lee JH
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Oct; 19(10):e340. PubMed ID: 29046269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system.
    Likourezos A; Chalfin DB; Murphy DG; Sommer B; Darcy K; Davidson SJ
    J Emerg Med; 2004 Nov; 27(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 15498630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of EMR deployment on doctors' work practices: a qualitative study in the emergency department of a teaching hospital.
    Park SY; Lee SY; Chen Y
    Int J Med Inform; 2012 Mar; 81(3):204-17. PubMed ID: 22217802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Acquisition of patient information from nurses by other health professionals under electronic medical record implementation.
    Kurihara Y; Fujii H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1025. PubMed ID: 23920799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Physicians' acceptance of electronic medical records exchange: an extension of the decomposed TPB model with institutional trust and perceived risk.
    Hsieh PJ
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Jan; 84(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 25242228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing the value of electronic records.
    Edwards K; Chiweda D; Oyinka A; McKay C; Wiles D
    Nurs Times; 2011 Oct 11-17; 107(40):12-4. PubMed ID: 22132486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measuring data reliability for preventive services in electronic medical records.
    Greiver M; Barnsley J; Glazier RH; Harvey BJ; Moineddin R
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 May; 12():116. PubMed ID: 22583552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. No paper, but the same routines: a qualitative exploration of experiences in two Norwegian hospitals deprived of the paper based medical record.
    Lium JT; Tjora A; Faxvaag A
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 18186935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A National Survey of EMR Usability: Comparisons between medical and nursing professions in the hospital and primary care sectors in Australia and Finland.
    Lloyd S; Long K; Oshni Alvandi A; Di Donato J; Probst Y; Roach J; Bain C
    Int J Med Inform; 2021 Oct; 154():104535. PubMed ID: 34425552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Nurses' views on the use, quality and user satisfaction with electronic medical records: questionnaire development.
    Otieno OG; Toyama H; Asonuma M; Kanai-Pak M; Naitoh K
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Oct; 60(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 17877568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electronic medical records, nurse staffing, and nurse-sensitive patient outcomes: evidence from the national database of nursing quality indicators.
    Furukawa MF; Raghu TS; Shao BB
    Med Care Res Rev; 2011 Jun; 68(3):311-31. PubMed ID: 21075750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Nursing is different than medicine: ethical difficulties in the process of care in surgical units.
    Torjuul K; Sorlie V
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Nov; 56(4):404-13. PubMed ID: 17042820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Patient safety climate in 92 US hospitals: differences by work area and discipline.
    Singer SJ; Gaba DM; Falwell A; Lin S; Hayes J; Baker L
    Med Care; 2009 Jan; 47(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 19106727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.