These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28188111)

  • 41. Meta-analyses including data from observational studies.
    O'Connor AM; Sargeant JM
    Prev Vet Med; 2014 Feb; 113(3):313-22. PubMed ID: 24268538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Negative Control Outcomes: A Tool to Detect Bias in Randomized Trials.
    Arnold BF; Ercumen A
    JAMA; 2016 Dec; 316(24):2597-2598. PubMed ID: 28027378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Graphical methods for detecting bias in meta-analysis.
    Ferrer RL
    Fam Med; 1998 Sep; 30(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 9773289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Out of step with the Lancet homeopathy meta-analysis: more objections than objectivity?
    Dean M
    J Altern Complement Med; 1998; 4(4):389-98. PubMed ID: 9884176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Observational studies and randomized trials.
    Kunz R; Khan KS; Neumayer HH
    N Engl J Med; 2000 Oct; 343(16):1194-5; author reply 1196-7. PubMed ID: 11041757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Different methods of allocation to groups in randomized trials are associated with different levels of bias. A meta-epidemiological study.
    Herbison P; Hay-Smith J; Gillespie WJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):1070-5. PubMed ID: 21474279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Biases in the evaluation of psychiatric clinical evidence.
    Makhinson M
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2012 Jan; 200(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 22210366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Meta-analysis: an introduction using regression models.
    Rhodes W
    Eval Rev; 2012 Feb; 36(1):24-71. PubMed ID: 22615500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A brief history of research synthesis.
    Chalmers I; Hedges LV; Cooper H
    Eval Health Prof; 2002 Mar; 25(1):12-37. PubMed ID: 11868442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Importance of a wide perspective on meta-analysis. It may be of crucial significance for the patients].
    Gøtzsche PC
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Oct; 162(42):5601. PubMed ID: 11059294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Network meta-analysis incorporating randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative cohort studies for assessing the safety and effectiveness of medical treatments: challenges and opportunities.
    Cameron C; Fireman B; Hutton B; Clifford T; Coyle D; Wells G; Dormuth CR; Platt R; Toh S
    Syst Rev; 2015 Nov; 4():147. PubMed ID: 26537988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Systematic reviews of surgical interventions.
    Burton M; Clarke M
    Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Feb; 86(1):101-14, ix. PubMed ID: 16442423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The promise and problems of meta-analysis.
    Bailar JC
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Aug; 337(8):559-61. PubMed ID: 9262502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Randomized trials and big data analysis: we need the best of both worlds.
    Treasure T; Takkenberg JJM
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 May; 53(5):910-914. PubMed ID: 29518194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Meta-analysis in urological clinical research].
    Jiménez Jiménez FJ
    Arch Esp Urol; 2003; 56(6):657-65. PubMed ID: 12959000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evidence synthesis for medical decision making and the appropriate use of quality scores.
    Doi SA
    Clin Med Res; 2014 Sep; 12(1-2):40-6. PubMed ID: 24415749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. How to find a meta-analysis you can trust.
    Nelson RL
    Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Sep; 23(9):919-923. PubMed ID: 31463635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A new form of meta-analysis for combining results from randomized clinical trials and medical-practice databases.
    Droitcour J; Silberman G; Chelimsky E
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1993; 9(3):440-9. PubMed ID: 8340208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The case for duplication of meta-analyses and systematic reviews.
    Krumholz H
    BMJ; 2013 Sep; 347():f5506. PubMed ID: 24022045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.