These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28188660)

  • 1. Assessing the importance of demographic parameters for population dynamics using Bayesian integrated population modeling.
    Eacker DR; Lukacs PM; Proffitt KM; Hebblewhite M
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Jun; 27(4):1280-1293. PubMed ID: 28188660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An improved understanding of ungulate population dynamics using count data: Insights from western Montana.
    Paterson JT; Proffitt K; Rotella J; Garrott R
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226492. PubMed ID: 31869366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding the demographic drivers of realized population growth rates.
    Koons DN; Arnold TW; Schaub M
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Oct; 27(7):2102-2115. PubMed ID: 28675581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patterns and causes of demographic variation in a harvested moose population: evidence for the effects of climate and density-dependent drivers.
    Brown GS
    J Anim Ecol; 2011 Nov; 80(6):1288-98. PubMed ID: 21668892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linking landscape-scale differences in forage to ungulate nutritional ecology.
    Proffitt KM; Hebblewhite M; Peters W; Hupp N; Shamhart J
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Oct; 26(7):2156-2174. PubMed ID: 27755722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An integrated population model for bird monitoring in North America.
    Ahrestani FS; Saracco JF; Sauer JR; Pardieck KL; Royle JA
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Apr; 27(3):916-924. PubMed ID: 28036137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Population-specific vital rate contributions influence management of an endangered ungulate.
    Johnson HE; Mills LS; Stephenson TR; Wehausen JD
    Ecol Appl; 2010 Sep; 20(6):1753-65. PubMed ID: 20945773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frog population viability under present and future climate conditions: a Bayesian state-space approach.
    McCaffery R; Solonen A; Crone E
    J Anim Ecol; 2012 Sep; 81(5):978-85. PubMed ID: 22574643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating abundance of an open population with an N-mixture model using auxiliary data on animal movements.
    Ketz AC; Johnson TL; Monello RJ; Mack JA; George JL; Kraft BR; Wild MA; Hooten MB; Hobbs NT
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Apr; 28(3):816-825. PubMed ID: 29405475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An integrated approach for predicting fates of reintroductions with demographic data from multiple populations.
    Parlato EH; Armstrong DP
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Feb; 26(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 22098341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Density dependence and climate effects in Rocky Mountain elk: an application of regression with instrumental variables for population time series with sampling error.
    Creel S; Creel M
    J Anim Ecol; 2009 Nov; 78(6):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19549144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A slow life in hell or a fast life in heaven: demographic analyses of contrasting roe deer populations.
    Nilsen EB; Gaillard JM; Andersen R; Odden J; Delorme D; van Laere G; Linnell JD
    J Anim Ecol; 2009 May; 78(3):585-94. PubMed ID: 19379139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal population prediction of sandhill crane recruitment based on climate-mediated habitat limitations.
    Gerber BD; Kendall WL; Hooten MB; Dubovsky JA; Drewien RC
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Sep; 84(5):1299-310. PubMed ID: 25808951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robustly estimating the demographic contribution of immigration: Simulation, sensitivity analysis and seals.
    Christian M; Oosthuizen WC; Bester MN; de Bruyn PJN
    J Anim Ecol; 2024 May; 93(5):632-645. PubMed ID: 38297453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variation in stability of elk and red deer populations with abiotic and biotic factors at the species-distribution scale.
    Ahrestani FS; Smith WK; Hebblewhite M; Running S; Post E
    Ecology; 2016 Nov; 97(11):3184-3194. PubMed ID: 27870038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the demographic buffering hypothesis with vital rates estimated for Weddell seals from 30 years of mark-recapture data.
    Rotella JJ; Link WA; Chambert T; Stauffer GE; Garrott RA
    J Anim Ecol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):162-73. PubMed ID: 21939440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maternal carryover, winter severity, and brown bear abundance relate to elk demographics.
    Schooler SL; Svoboda NJ; Finnegan SP; Crye J; Kellner KF; Belant JL
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274359. PubMed ID: 36173937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Demography of a reintroduced population: moving toward management models for an endangered species, the Whooping Crane.
    Servanty S; Converse SJ; Bailey LL
    Ecol Appl; 2014 Jul; 24(5):927-37. PubMed ID: 25154087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An ecosystem approach to population management of ungulates.
    Weisberg PJ; Hobbs NT; Ellis JE; Coughenour MB
    J Environ Manage; 2002 Jun; 65(2):181-97. PubMed ID: 12197079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Demographic consequences of climate change and land cover help explain a history of extirpations and range contraction in a declining snake species.
    Pomara LY; LeDee OE; Martin KJ; Zuckerberg B
    Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Jul; 20(7):2087-99. PubMed ID: 24357530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.