These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28189037)

  • 1. How the twain can meet: Prospect theory and models of heuristics in risky choice.
    Pachur T; Suter RS; Hertwig R
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Mar; 93():44-73. PubMed ID: 28189037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive models of risky choice: parameter stability and predictive accuracy of prospect theory.
    Glöckner A; Pachur T
    Cognition; 2012 Apr; 123(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 22226615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospect theory reflects selective allocation of attention.
    Pachur T; Schulte-Mecklenbeck M; Murphy RO; Hertwig R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Feb; 147(2):147-169. PubMed ID: 29369680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The neural basis of risky choice with affective outcomes.
    Suter RS; Pachur T; Hertwig R; Endestad T; Biele G
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0122475. PubMed ID: 25830918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the priority heuristic as a descriptive model of risky decision making: comment on Brandstätter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig (2006).
    Birnbaum MH
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Jan; 115(1):253-62. PubMed ID: 18211200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Salience-Driven Value Construction for Adaptive Choice under Risk.
    Spitmaan M; Chu E; Soltani A
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jun; 39(26):5195-5209. PubMed ID: 31023835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonlinear probability weighting can reflect attentional biases in sequential sampling.
    Zilker V; Pachur T
    Psychol Rev; 2022 Oct; 129(5):949-975. PubMed ID: 34370495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How (in)variant are subjective representations of described and experienced risk and rewards?
    Kellen D; Pachur T; Hertwig R
    Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():126-138. PubMed ID: 27620961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to Change the Weight of Rare Events in Decisions From Experience.
    Hotaling JM; Jarvstad A; Donkin C; Newell BR
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Dec; 30(12):1767-1779. PubMed ID: 31725348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling choice paradoxes under risk: From prospect theories to sampling-based accounts.
    Kellen D; Steiner MD; Davis-Stober CP; Pappas NR
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 May; 118():101258. PubMed ID: 32058123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation and comparison of models of risky intertemporal choice.
    Luckman A; Donkin C; Newell BR
    Psychol Rev; 2020 Nov; 127(6):1097-1138. PubMed ID: 32700921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attribute attention and option attention in risky choice.
    Zilker V; Pachur T
    Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105441. PubMed ID: 37058827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospect theory in the health domain: a quantitative assessment.
    Attema AE; Brouwer WB; I'Haridon O
    J Health Econ; 2013 Dec; 32(6):1057-65. PubMed ID: 24103499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The formation of preference in risky choice.
    Glickman M; Sharoni O; Levy DJ; Niebur E; Stuphorn V; Usher M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Aug; 15(8):e1007201. PubMed ID: 31465438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Yes, they can! Appropriate weighting of small probabilities as a function of information acquisition.
    Hilbig BE; Glöckner A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Nov; 138(3):390-6. PubMed ID: 21974869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exaggerated risk: prospect theory and probability weighting in risky choice.
    Kusev P; van Schaik P; Ayton P; Dent J; Chater N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1487-505. PubMed ID: 19857019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using Bayesian hierarchical parameter estimation to assess the generalizability of cognitive models of choice.
    Scheibehenne B; Pachur T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Apr; 22(2):391-407. PubMed ID: 25134469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing utility functions between risky and riskless choice in rhesus monkeys.
    Bujold PM; Seak LCU; Schultz W; Ferrari-Toniolo S
    Anim Cogn; 2022 Apr; 25(2):385-399. PubMed ID: 34568979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A psychophysical account of patient non-adherence to medical prescriptions. The case of insulin dose adjustment.
    Reach G
    Diabetes Metab; 2013 Feb; 39(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 23103031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospect balancing theory: Bounded rationality of drivers' speed choice.
    Schmidt-Daffy M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Feb; 63():49-64. PubMed ID: 24269862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.