364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28189363)
1. Cost-effectiveness of Pazopanib Versus Sunitinib as First-line Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma from an Italian National Health Service Perspective.
Capri S; Porta C; Delea TE
Clin Ther; 2017 Mar; 39(3):567-580.e2. PubMed ID: 28189363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An updated cost-effectiveness analysis of pazopanib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Italy.
Capri S; Porta C; Condorelli C; Premoli E; Khare A; Kalra M; Modi N; Ratto B
J Med Econ; 2020 Dec; 23(12):1579-1587. PubMed ID: 33079593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of pazopanib versus sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the United Kingdom.
Amdahl J; Diaz J; Sharma A; Park J; Chandiwana D; Delea TE
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0175920. PubMed ID: 28636648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of pazopanib versus sunitinib for renal cancer in the United States.
Delea TE; Amdahl J; Diaz J; Nakhaipour HR; Hackshaw MD
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2015 Jan; 21(1):46-54, 54a-b. PubMed ID: 25562772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Economic evaluation of sunitinib versus pazopanib and best supportive care for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Chile: cost-effectiveness analysis and a mixed treatment comparison.
Vargas C; Balmaceda C; Rodríguez F; Rojas R; Giglio A; Espinoza MA
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2019 Oct; 19(5):609-617. PubMed ID: 30758237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-utility of Sunitinib Versus Pazopanib in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in Canada using Real-world Evidence.
Nazha S; Tanguay S; Kapoor A; Jewett M; Kollmannsberger C; Wood L; Bjarnason GAG; Heng D; Soulières D; Reaume MN; Basappa N; Lévesque E; Dragomir A
Clin Drug Investig; 2018 Dec; 38(12):1155-1165. PubMed ID: 30267257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pazopanib versus sunitinib for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with poor-risk features.
Kim JH; Park I; Lee JL
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2016 Aug; 78(2):325-32. PubMed ID: 27324136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Economic evaluation of sunitinib malate for the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Remák E; Charbonneau C; Négrier S; Kim ST; Motzer RJ
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Aug; 26(24):3995-4000. PubMed ID: 18711190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity analysis of pazopanib versus sunitinib in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Beaumont JL; Salsman JM; Diaz J; Deen KC; McCann L; Powles T; Hackshaw MD; Motzer RJ; Cella D
Cancer; 2016 Apr; 122(7):1108-15. PubMed ID: 27000445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Elderly Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Starting Pazopanib or Sunitinib Treatment: A Retrospective Medicare Claims Analysis.
Vogelzang NJ; Pal SK; Ghate SR; Swallow E; Li N; Peeples M; Zichlin ML; Meiselbach MK; Perez JR; Agarwal N
Adv Ther; 2017 Nov; 34(11):2452-2465. PubMed ID: 29076108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma.
Motzer RJ; Hutson TE; Cella D; Reeves J; Hawkins R; Guo J; Nathan P; Staehler M; de Souza P; Merchan JR; Boleti E; Fife K; Jin J; Jones R; Uemura H; De Giorgi U; Harmenberg U; Wang J; Sternberg CN; Deen K; McCann L; Hackshaw MD; Crescenzo R; Pandite LN; Choueiri TK
N Engl J Med; 2013 Aug; 369(8):722-31. PubMed ID: 23964934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A cost-effectiveness analysis of sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma intolerant to or experiencing disease progression on immunotherapy: perspective of the Spanish National Health System.
Paz-Ares L; del Muro JG; Grande E; Díaz S
J Clin Pharm Ther; 2010 Aug; 35(4):429-38. PubMed ID: 20831545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Economic evaluation of sunitinib malate in second-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Finland.
Purmonen T; Martikainen JA; Soini EJ; Kataja V; Vuorinen RL; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL
Clin Ther; 2008 Feb; 30(2):382-92. PubMed ID: 18343276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Persistence and compliance among U.S. patients receiving pazopanib or sunitinib as first-line therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective claims analysis.
Byfield SA; McPheeters JT; Burton TM; Nagar SP; Hackshaw MD
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2015 Jun; 21(6):515-22. PubMed ID: 26011553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab with axitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Bensimon AG; Zhong Y; Swami U; Briggs A; Young J; Feng Y; Song Y; Signorovitch J; Adejoro O; Chakravarty A; Chen M; Perini RF; Geynisman DM
Curr Med Res Opin; 2020 Sep; 36(9):1507-1517. PubMed ID: 32697113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pazopanib for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma : a NICE single technology appraisal.
Kilonzo M; Hislop J; Elders A; Fraser C; Bissett D; McClinton S; Mowatt G; Vale L
Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Jan; 31(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 23329590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of pazopanib compared with sunitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Canada.
Amdahl J; Diaz J; Park J; Nakhaipour HR; Delea TE
Curr Oncol; 2016 Aug; 23(4):e340-54. PubMed ID: 27536183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of sunitinib as first-line targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Spain.
Calvo Aller E; Maroto P; Kreif N; González Larriba JL; López-Brea M; Castellano D; Martí B; Díaz Cerezo S
Clin Transl Oncol; 2011 Dec; 13(12):869-77. PubMed ID: 22126730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bevacizumab, sorafenib tosylate, sunitinib and temsirolimus for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Thompson Coon J; Hoyle M; Green C; Liu Z; Welch K; Moxham T; Stein K
Health Technol Assess; 2010 Jan; 14(2):1-184, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 20028613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Commentary on: "Randomized, controlled, double-blind, cross-over trial assessing treatment preference for pazopanib versus sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: PISCES study." Escudier B, Porta C, Bono P, Powles T, Eisen T, Sternberg CN, Gschwend JE, De Giorgi U, Parikh O, Hawkins R, Sevin E, Négrier S, Khan S, Diaz J, Redhu S, Mehmud F, Cella D. Bernard Escudier, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Emmanuel Sevin, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; Sylvie Négrier, Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Camillo Porta, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia; Cora N Sternberg, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome; Ugo De Giorgi, IRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Meldola, Italy; Petri Bono, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Thomas Powles, Barts Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London; Tim Eisen, Cambridge University Health Partners, Cambridge; Omi Parikh, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire; Robert Hawkins, Christie Cancer Research UK, Manchester; Sadya Khan, Jose Diaz, and Faisal Mehmud, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, United Kingdom; Jürgen E Gschwend, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany; Suman Redhu, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA; David Cella, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.: J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 10;32(14):1412-1418; doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.8267. [Epub 2014 Mar 31].
Trump D
Urol Oncol; 2016 May; 34(5):251. PubMed ID: 25937427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
