537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28189441)
21. No difference in failure rates or clinical outcomes between non-stemmed constrained condylar prostheses and posterior-stabilized prostheses for primary total knee arthroplasty.
Dayan I; Moses MJ; Rathod P; Deshmukh A; Marwin S; Dayan AJ
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Sep; 28(9):2942-2947. PubMed ID: 31456063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Comparison Between Unstemmed and Stemmed Constrained Condylar Knee Prostheses in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Zhao EZ; Zeng WN; Ding ZC; Liu ZH; Luo ZY; Zhou ZK
Orthop Surg; 2022 Feb; 14(2):246-253. PubMed ID: 34898021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mid-term outcomes following primary semi-constrained total knee arthroplasty in patients less than 60 years old, a retrospective review.
Johnson DB; Triplet JJ; Gaines DR; Gupta A; Unverferth KL
Knee; 2019 Jun; 26(3):714-719. PubMed ID: 30902516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Hinged versus CCK revision arthroplasty for the stiff total knee.
Hermans K; Vandenneucker H; Truijen J; Oosterbosch J; Bellemans J
Knee; 2019 Jan; 26(1):222-227. PubMed ID: 30415974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Complex Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Long-Term Outcomes.
Martin JR; Beahrs TR; Stuhlman CR; Trousdale RT
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Sep; 98(17):1459-70. PubMed ID: 27605690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Difficult primary total knee arthroplasty requiring a varus-valgus constrained implant is at higher risk of periprosthetic infection.
Costa GG; Lo Presti M; Agrò G; Vasco C; Cialdella S; Casali M; Neri MP; Grassi A; Zaffagnini S
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Dec; 28(12):3787-3795. PubMed ID: 31982919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior stabilized, condylar constrained or fully constrained prosthesis: a minimum 2-year follow-up analysis.
Hwang SC; Kong JY; Nam DC; Kim DH; Park HB; Jeong ST; Cho SH
Clin Orthop Surg; 2010 Jun; 2(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 20514269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Instability-Outcome for Different Types of Instability and Implants.
Luttjeboer JS; Bénard MR; Defoort KC; van Hellemondt GG; Wymenga AB
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Dec; 31(12):2672-2676. PubMed ID: 27546470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Incidence, indications, outcomes, and survivorship of stems in primary total knee arthroplasty.
Barlow BT; Oi KK; Lee YY; Joseph AD; Alexiades MM
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3611-3619. PubMed ID: 27387308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Long-Term Durability of Ceramic Tri-Condylar Knee Implants: A Minimum 15-Year Follow-Up.
Nakamura S; Ito H; Nakamura K; Kuriyama S; Furu M; Matsuda S
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1874-1879. PubMed ID: 28209274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Results of a Modular Revision System in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Crawford DA; Berend KR; Morris MJ; Adams JB; Lombardi AV
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Sep; 32(9):2792-2798. PubMed ID: 28502536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of stemmed and unstemmed components in revision knee arthroplasty.
Nazarian DG; Mehta S; Booth RE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Nov; (404):256-62. PubMed ID: 12439267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Rotating Hinge Implants for Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Kearns SM; Culp BM; Bohl DD; Sporer SM; Della Valle CJ; Levine BR
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Mar; 33(3):766-770. PubMed ID: 29129618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mid-term outcomes of primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty for severe knee deformity.
Feng XB; Yang C; Fu DH; Ye SN; Liu XZ; Chen Z; Rai S; Yang SH
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2016 Apr; 36(2):231-236. PubMed ID: 27072968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Failure After Modern Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study of 18,065 Knees.
Pitta M; Esposito CI; Li Z; Lee YY; Wright TM; Padgett DE
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):407-414. PubMed ID: 29079167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Are the Outcomes of Revision Knee Arthroplasty for Flexion Instability the Same as for Other Major Failure Mechanisms?
Rajgopal A; Panjwani TR; Rao A; Dahiya V
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Oct; 32(10):3093-3097. PubMed ID: 28579447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Midterm Clinical and Radiographic Results of Mobile-Bearing Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Kim RH; Martin JR; Dennis DA; Yang CC; Jennings JM; Lee GC
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1930-1934. PubMed ID: 28209272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Outcomes of long retrograde intramedullary nailing for periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty.
Lee SS; Lim SJ; Moon YW; Seo JG
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Jan; 134(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 24276359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Early outcomes of twin-peg mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with primary total knee arthroplasty.
Lum ZC; Lombardi AV; Hurst JM; Morris MJ; Adams JB; Berend KR
Bone Joint J; 2016 Oct; 98-B(10 Supple B):28-33. PubMed ID: 27694513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Total knee arthroplasty revision with trabecular tantalum cones: Preliminary retrospective study of 51 patients from two centres with a minimal 2-year follow-up.
Girerd D; Parratte S; Lunebourg A; Boureau F; Ollivier M; Pasquier G; Putman S; Migaud H; Argenson JN
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Jun; 102(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 27052939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
