These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28189609)
1. Impact of surgical training on the performance of proposed quality measures for hysterectomy for pelvic organĀ prolapse. Adams-Piper ER; Guaderrama NM; Chen Q; Whitcomb EL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 216(6):588.e1-588.e5. PubMed ID: 28189609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism events after different routes of pelvic organ prolapse repairs. Chong W; Bui AH; Menhaji K Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):268.e1-268.e26. PubMed ID: 32413430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing Resident Surgical Volume Before and After Initiation of a Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Fellowship. Chaudhry Z; Tarnay CM J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(3):450-454. PubMed ID: 27988170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Survey of pelvic reconstructive surgeons on performance of opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of pelvic organ prolapse repair. Hassani DB; Mangel JM; Mahajan ST; Hijaz AK; El-Nashar S; Sheyn D Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Mar; 30(3):447-453. PubMed ID: 29656331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rates of colpopexy and colporrhaphy at the time of hysterectomy for prolapse. Fairchild PS; Kamdar NS; Berger MB; Morgan DM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 214(2):262.e1-262.e7. PubMed ID: 26366666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The association between surgeon subspecialty training and postoperative outcomes following surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Warner KJ; Brown O; Bretschneider CE Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):315.e1-315.e7. PubMed ID: 35568192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Practice Patterns Regarding Apical Support Procedures at Time of Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Hill AM; Pauls RN; Crisp CC Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Dec; 26(12):774-778. PubMed ID: 30921081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Major postoperative complications following surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: a secondary database analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Erekson E; Murchison RL; Gerjevic KA; Meljen VT; Strohbehn K Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):608.e1-608.e17. PubMed ID: 28578172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The fellowship effect: how the establishment of a fellowship in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery affected resident vaginal hysterectomy training. Danford JM; White NC; New M; Fletcher S; Blume JD; Ward RM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):559.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25025941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Statewide geographic variation in hysterectomy approach for pelvic organ prolapse: a county-level analysis. Latack KR; Moniz M; Hong CX; Schmidt P; Malone A; Kamdar N; Madden B; Pizzo CA; Thompson MP; Morgan DM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Sep; 229(3):320.e1-320.e7. PubMed ID: 37244455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences in Patterns of Preoperative Assessment Between High, Intermediate, and Low Volume Surgeons When Performing Hysterectomy for Uterovaginal Prolapse. Pulliam SJ; Morgan DM; Guaderrama N; Guire K; Adam RA Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 26516806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. Meriwether KV; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Balk EM; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Addressing apical support during hysterectomy for prolapse: a NSQIP review. Hill AM; Pauls RN; Crisp CC Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Jul; 31(7):1349-1355. PubMed ID: 32242277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):552.e1-552.e7. PubMed ID: 34437864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of Minimally Invasive Gynaecology Fellowship Training on Quality Performance Metrics for Hysterectomy. Shirreff L; Matelski JJ; Sunderji Z; Cipolla A; Bougie O; Shapiro J; Po LK; Lee S; Evans D; Murji A J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Dec; 43(12):1364-1371. PubMed ID: 34153536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term reoperation risk after apical prolapse repair in female pelvic reconstructive surgery. Shah NM; Berger AA; Zhuang Z; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):306.e1-306.e16. PubMed ID: 35654112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of surgical case volume and fellowship training with performance on simulated procedural tasks. Doneza JA; Palvia V; Lerner VT; Overbey J; Levie M; Brodman M; Ascher-Walsh C Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):548.e1-548.e10. PubMed ID: 34147495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reconstructive Surgery at Hysterectomy for Patients With Uterine Prolapse and Gynecologic Malignancy. Deshpande RR; Foy OB; Mandelbaum RS; Roman LD; Dancz CE; Wright JD; Matsuo K Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 142(6):1487-1490. PubMed ID: 37847908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs. Hemming C; Constable L; Goulao B; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Elders A; Cooper K; Smith A; Freeman R; Breeman S; McDonald A; Hagen S; Montgomery I; Norrie J; Glazener C Health Technol Assess; 2020 Mar; 24(13):1-220. PubMed ID: 32138809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]