296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28189609)
1. Impact of surgical training on the performance of proposed quality measures for hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Adams-Piper ER; Guaderrama NM; Chen Q; Whitcomb EL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 216(6):588.e1-588.e5. PubMed ID: 28189609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gynecologic Surgical Subspecialty Training Decreases Surgical Complications in Benign Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.
Pfeuti CK; Makai G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 Mar; 31(3):250-257. PubMed ID: 38151094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism events after different routes of pelvic organ prolapse repairs.
Chong W; Bui AH; Menhaji K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):268.e1-268.e26. PubMed ID: 32413430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing Resident Surgical Volume Before and After Initiation of a Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Fellowship.
Chaudhry Z; Tarnay CM
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(3):450-454. PubMed ID: 27988170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Survey of pelvic reconstructive surgeons on performance of opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of pelvic organ prolapse repair.
Hassani DB; Mangel JM; Mahajan ST; Hijaz AK; El-Nashar S; Sheyn D
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Mar; 30(3):447-453. PubMed ID: 29656331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rates of colpopexy and colporrhaphy at the time of hysterectomy for prolapse.
Fairchild PS; Kamdar NS; Berger MB; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 214(2):262.e1-262.e7. PubMed ID: 26366666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The association between surgeon subspecialty training and postoperative outcomes following surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
Warner KJ; Brown O; Bretschneider CE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):315.e1-315.e7. PubMed ID: 35568192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Practice Patterns Regarding Apical Support Procedures at Time of Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Hill AM; Pauls RN; Crisp CC
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Dec; 26(12):774-778. PubMed ID: 30921081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Major postoperative complications following surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: a secondary database analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Erekson E; Murchison RL; Gerjevic KA; Meljen VT; Strohbehn K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):608.e1-608.e17. PubMed ID: 28578172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The fellowship effect: how the establishment of a fellowship in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery affected resident vaginal hysterectomy training.
Danford JM; White NC; New M; Fletcher S; Blume JD; Ward RM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):559.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25025941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Statewide geographic variation in hysterectomy approach for pelvic organ prolapse: a county-level analysis.
Latack KR; Moniz M; Hong CX; Schmidt P; Malone A; Kamdar N; Madden B; Pizzo CA; Thompson MP; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Sep; 229(3):320.e1-320.e7. PubMed ID: 37244455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences in Patterns of Preoperative Assessment Between High, Intermediate, and Low Volume Surgeons When Performing Hysterectomy for Uterovaginal Prolapse.
Pulliam SJ; Morgan DM; Guaderrama N; Guire K; Adam RA
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 26516806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
Meriwether KV; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Balk EM; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Addressing apical support during hysterectomy for prolapse: a NSQIP review.
Hill AM; Pauls RN; Crisp CC
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Jul; 31(7):1349-1355. PubMed ID: 32242277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):552.e1-552.e7. PubMed ID: 34437864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of Minimally Invasive Gynaecology Fellowship Training on Quality Performance Metrics for Hysterectomy.
Shirreff L; Matelski JJ; Sunderji Z; Cipolla A; Bougie O; Shapiro J; Po LK; Lee S; Evans D; Murji A
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Dec; 43(12):1364-1371. PubMed ID: 34153536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term reoperation risk after apical prolapse repair in female pelvic reconstructive surgery.
Shah NM; Berger AA; Zhuang Z; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):306.e1-306.e16. PubMed ID: 35654112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of surgical case volume and fellowship training with performance on simulated procedural tasks.
Doneza JA; Palvia V; Lerner VT; Overbey J; Levie M; Brodman M; Ascher-Walsh C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):548.e1-548.e10. PubMed ID: 34147495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reconstructive Surgery at Hysterectomy for Patients With Uterine Prolapse and Gynecologic Malignancy.
Deshpande RR; Foy OB; Mandelbaum RS; Roman LD; Dancz CE; Wright JD; Matsuo K
Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 142(6):1487-1490. PubMed ID: 37847908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs.
Hemming C; Constable L; Goulao B; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Elders A; Cooper K; Smith A; Freeman R; Breeman S; McDonald A; Hagen S; Montgomery I; Norrie J; Glazener C
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Mar; 24(13):1-220. PubMed ID: 32138809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
