These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28189820)

  • 1. The Patient Feedback Response Framework - Understanding why UK hospital staff find it difficult to make improvements based on patient feedback: A qualitative study.
    Sheard L; Marsh C; O'Hara J; Armitage G; Wright J; Lawton R
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 Apr; 178():19-27. PubMed ID: 28189820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring how ward staff engage with the implementation of a patient safety intervention: a UK-based qualitative process evaluation.
    Sheard L; Marsh C; O'Hara J; Armitage G; Wright J; Lawton R
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jul; 7(7):e014558. PubMed ID: 28710206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What's the problem with patient experience feedback? A macro and micro understanding, based on findings from a three-site UK qualitative study.
    Sheard L; Peacock R; Marsh C; Lawton R
    Health Expect; 2019 Feb; 22(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30244499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid evaluation of the Special Measures for Quality and challenged provider regimes: a mixed-methods study.
    Fulop NJ; Capelas Barbosa E; Hill M; Ledger J; Li Ng P; Sherlaw-Johnson C; Rolewicz L; Schlepper L; Spencer J; Tomini SM; Vindrola-Padros C; Morris S
    Health Soc Care Deliv Res; 2023 Oct; 11(19):1-139. PubMed ID: 37921786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the PRASE patient safety intervention - a multi-centre, cluster trial with a qualitative process evaluation: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Sheard L; O'Hara J; Armitage G; Wright J; Cocks K; McEachan R; Watt I; Lawton R;
    Trials; 2014 Oct; 15():420. PubMed ID: 25354689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    Newell S; Jordan Z
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Change is what can actually make the tough times better": A patient-centred patient safety intervention delivered in collaboration with hospital volunteers.
    Louch G; Mohammed MA; Hughes L; O'Hara J
    Health Expect; 2019 Feb; 22(1):102-113. PubMed ID: 30345726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementing a survey for patients to provide safety experience feedback following a care transition: a feasibility study.
    Scott J; Heavey E; Waring J; De Brún A; Dawson P
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Aug; 19(1):613. PubMed ID: 31470853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facilitated patient experience feedback can improve nursing care: a pilot study for a phase III cluster randomised controlled trial.
    Reeves R; West E; Barron D
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Jul; 13():259. PubMed ID: 23826970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The patient reporting and action for a safe environment (PRASE) intervention: a feasibility study.
    O'Hara JK; Lawton RJ; Armitage G; Sheard L; Marsh C; Cocks K; McEachan RR; Reynolds C; Watt I; Wright J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Nov; 16(1):676. PubMed ID: 27894289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the Productive Ward at an acute NHS trust: experiences and implications of releasing time to care.
    Wright S; McSherry W
    J Clin Nurs; 2014 Jul; 23(13-14):1866-76. PubMed ID: 24313355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Large scale organisational intervention to improve patient safety in four UK hospitals: mixed method evaluation.
    Benning A; Ghaleb M; Suokas A; Dixon-Woods M; Dawson J; Barber N; Franklin BD; Girling A; Hemming K; Carmalt M; Rudge G; Naicker T; Nwulu U; Choudhury S; Lilford R
    BMJ; 2011 Feb; 342():d195. PubMed ID: 21292719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A qualitative study of organisational response to national quality standards for 7-day services in English hospitals.
    Sutton E; Bion J; Mannion R; Willars J; Shaw E; Tarrant C
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Mar; 21(1):205. PubMed ID: 33676507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How do frontline staff use patient experience data for service improvement? Findings from an ethnographic case study evaluation.
    Locock L; Montgomery C; Parkin S; Chisholm A; Bostock J; Dopson S; Gager M; Gibbons E; Graham C; King J; Martin A; Powell J; Ziebland S
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2020 Jul; 25(3):151-161. PubMed ID: 32056464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 'Team capital' in quality improvement teams: findings from an ethnographic study of front-line quality improvement in the NHS.
    Montgomery C; Parkin S; Chisholm A; Locock L
    BMJ Open Qual; 2020 May; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 32461250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Opportunities to enhance ward audit: a multi-site qualitative study.
    Sykes M; Thomson R; Kolehmainen N; Allan L; Finch T
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Mar; 21(1):226. PubMed ID: 33712006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of the Open and Honest Care Programme in acute NHS trusts in Northern England.
    Christiansen A; Barnes T; Bewley T; Kaehne A; Lynes D; Kirkcaldy A
    J Nurs Manag; 2016 Sep; 24(6):755-65. PubMed ID: 27005997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.