189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28190372)
1. Training Performance of Laparoscopic Surgery in Two- and Three-Dimensional Displays.
Lin CJ; Cheng CF; Chen HJ; Wu KY
Surg Innov; 2017 Apr; 24(2):162-170. PubMed ID: 28190372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Skills Comparison in Pediatric Residents Using a 2-Dimensional versus a 3-Dimensional High-Definition Camera in a Pediatric Laparoscopic Simulator.
Guanà R; Ferrero L; Garofalo S; Cerrina A; Cussa D; Arezzo A; Schleef J
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(4):644-649. PubMed ID: 28039097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The learning effect of using stereoscopic vision in the early phase of laparoscopic surgical training for novices.
Harada H; Kanaji S; Nishi M; Otake Y; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Matsuda Y; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Sumi Y; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Sato Y; Kakeji Y
Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):582-588. PubMed ID: 28643059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Training improves laparoscopic tasks performance and decreases operator workload.
Hu JS; Lu J; Tan WB; Lomanto D
Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):1742-6. PubMed ID: 26173550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of crosstalk on three-dimensional laparoscopic performance and workload.
Sakata S; Grove PM; Watson MO; Stevenson ARL
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4044-4050. PubMed ID: 28281125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of passive polarizing three-dimensional displays on surgical performance for experienced laparoscopic surgeons.
Smith R; Schwab K; Day A; Rockall T; Ballard K; Bailey M; Jourdan I
Br J Surg; 2014 Oct; 101(11):1453-9. PubMed ID: 25131843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of simulated three-dimensional perception on precision of depth judgements, technical performance and perceived workload in laparoscopy.
Sakata S; Grove PM; Hill A; Watson MO; Stevenson ARL
Br J Surg; 2017 Jul; 104(8):1097-1106. PubMed ID: 28425560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of 3D vision on mental workload and laparoscopic performance in inexperienced subjects.
Gómez-Gómez E; Carrasco-Valiente J; Valero-Rosa J; Campos-Hernández JP; Anglada-Curado FJ; Carazo-Carazo JL; Font-Ugalde P; Requena-Tapia MJ
Actas Urol Esp; 2015 May; 39(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 25457567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of stereoscopic visualization on surgical skill acquisition in novices.
Mistry M; Roach VA; Wilson TD
J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(5):563-70. PubMed ID: 24016365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comparative Study of Distinct Ocular Symptoms After Performing Laparoscopic Surgical Tasks Using a Three-Dimensional Surgical Imaging System and a Conventional Two-Dimensional Surgical Imaging System.
Zhou J; Xu HJ; Liang CZ; Zhang L; Hao ZY; Feng LX
J Endourol; 2015 Jul; 29(7):816-20. PubMed ID: 25669315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D vs. 4K Display System - Influence of "State-of-the-art"-Display Technique On Surgical Performance (IDOSP-Study) in minimally invasive surgery: protocol for a randomized cross-over trial.
Wahba R; Datta RR; Hedergott A; Bußhoff J; Bruns T; Kleinert R; Dieplinger G; Fuchs H; Gietzelt C; Möller D; Hellmich M; Bruns CJ; Stippel DL
Trials; 2019 May; 20(1):299. PubMed ID: 31138290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 2D vs. 3D imaging in laparoscopic surgery-results of a prospective randomized trial.
Buia A; Stockhausen F; Filmann N; Hanisch E
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Dec; 402(8):1241-1253. PubMed ID: 28986719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stereoscopic (3D) versus monoscopic (2D) laparoscopy: comparative study of performance using advanced HD optical systems in a surgical simulator model.
Schoenthaler M; Schnell D; Wilhelm K; Schlager D; Adams F; Hein S; Wetterauer U; Miernik A
World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 26242728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of HD 2D/3D laparoscopic monitors and benchmarking to a theoretically ideal 3D pseudodisplay: even well-experienced laparoscopists perform better with 3D.
Wilhelm D; Reiser S; Kohn N; Witte M; Leiner U; Mühlbach L; Ruschin D; Reiner W; Feussner H
Surg Endosc; 2014 Aug; 28(8):2387-97. PubMed ID: 24651895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cognitive load in 3d and 2d minimally invasive colorectal surgery.
Inama M; Spolverato G; Impellizzeri H; Bacchion M; Creciun M; Casaril A; Moretto G
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jul; 34(7):3262-3269. PubMed ID: 32239306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating a Novel 3D Stereoscopic Visual Display for Transanal Endoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study.
Di Marco AN; Jeyakumar J; Pratt PJ; Yang GZ; Darzi AW
Ann Surg; 2016 Jan; 263(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 26079918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How Much Stereoscopic Effect Does Laparoscopy Need? Controlled, Prospective Randomized Trial on Surgical Task Efficiency in Standardized Phantom Tasks.
Kunert W; Auer T; Storz P; Braun M; Kirschniak A; Falch C
Surg Innov; 2018 Oct; 25(5):515-524. PubMed ID: 30028243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A secondary learning curve in 3D versus 2D imaging in laparoscopic training of surgical novices.
Kang ML; Wong CMJ; Tan H; Bohari A; Han TO; Soon Y
Surg Endosc; 2021 Mar; 35(3):1046-1051. PubMed ID: 32112254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distraction and proficiency in laparoscopy: 2D versus robotic console 3D immersion.
Kim S; May A; Ryan H; Mohsin A; Tsuda S
Surg Endosc; 2017 Nov; 31(11):4625-4630. PubMed ID: 28409364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of Training on Three-Dimensional versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic Systems on Acquisition of Laparoscopic Skills in Novices: A Prospective Comparative Pilot Study.
Noureldin YA; Stoica A; Kaneva P; Andonian S
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():4197693. PubMed ID: 27995141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
