These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

728 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28190414)

  • 1. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of European beef: 2. Demographic factors have only minor effects on consumer scores and willingness to pay.
    Bonny SPF; Gardner GE; Pethick DW; Allen P; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Hocquette JF
    Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1399-1411. PubMed ID: 28190414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of beef: 1. A single composite score can predict beef quality grades.
    Bonny SPF; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
    Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1389-1398. PubMed ID: 27829474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The variation in the eating quality of beef from different sexes and breed classes cannot be completely explained by carcass measurements.
    Bonny SP; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Farmer LJ; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):987-95. PubMed ID: 26750424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Review: The variability of the eating quality of beef can be reduced by predicting consumer satisfaction.
    Bonny SPF; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
    Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2434-2442. PubMed ID: 29606159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do demographic and beef eating preferences impact on South African consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for graded beef?
    Strydom P; Burrow H; Polkinghorne R; Thompson J
    Meat Sci; 2019 Apr; 150():122-130. PubMed ID: 30677552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of beef eating quality by Irish consumers.
    McCarthy SN; Henchion M; White A; Brandon K; Allen P
    Meat Sci; 2017 Oct; 132():118-124. PubMed ID: 28522169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of Japanese and Australian consumers' sensory perceptions of beef.
    Polkinghorne RJ; Nishimura T; Neath KE; Watson R
    Anim Sci J; 2014 Jan; 85(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 23773578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of taste in willingness-to-pay valuations of sirloin steaks from postextraction algal residue-fed cattle.
    Johnson MD; Miller RK; Morrill JC; Anderson DP; Wickersham TA; Sawyer JE; Richardson JW; Palma MA
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Jul; 94(7):3072-83. PubMed ID: 27482694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regional, socioeconomic and behavioural- impacts on consumer acceptability of beef in Northern Ireland, Republic of Ireland and Great Britain.
    Chong FS; Farmer LJ; Hagan TDJ; Speers JS; Sanderson DW; Devlin DJ; Tollerton IJ; Gordon AW; Methven L; Moloney AP; Kerry JP; O'Sullivan MG
    Meat Sci; 2019 Aug; 154():86-95. PubMed ID: 31022586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contributions of tenderness, juiciness and flavor liking to overall liking of beef in Europe.
    Liu J; Ellies-Oury MP; Chriki S; Legrand I; Pogorzelski G; Wierzbicki J; Farmer L; Troy D; Polkinghorne R; Hocquette JF
    Meat Sci; 2020 Oct; 168():108190. PubMed ID: 32450455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Japanese consumer categorisation of beef into quality grades, based on Meat Standards Australia methodology.
    Polkinghorne RJ; Nishimura T; Neath KE; Watson R
    Anim Sci J; 2011 Apr; 82(2):325-33. PubMed ID: 21729214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does a single adjustment in the meat standards Australia beef grading model cater for different hormonal growth promotant formulations?
    Packer DT; McGilchrist P; Polkinghorne RJ; Ball AJ; Thompson JM
    Animal; 2021 May; 15(5):100196. PubMed ID: 34029795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polish consumer categorisation of grilled beef at 6 mm and 25 mm thickness into quality grades, based on Meat Standards Australia methodology.
    Pogorzelski G; Woźniak K; Polkinghorne R; Półtorak A; Wierzbicka A
    Meat Sci; 2020 Mar; 161():107953. PubMed ID: 31675648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biochemical measurements of beef are a good predictor of untrained consumer sensory scores across muscles.
    Bonny SP; Gardner GE; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Polkinghorne RJ; Hocquette JF
    Animal; 2015 Jan; 9(1):179-90. PubMed ID: 25245561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of the effect of brand and product identification on consumer palatability ratings of ground beef patties.
    Wilfong AK; McKillip KV; Gonzalez JM; Houser TA; Unruh JA; Boyle EA; O'Quinn TG
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Nov; 94(11):4943-4958. PubMed ID: 27898955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of beef eating quality in France using the Meat Standards Australia system.
    Legrand I; Hocquette JF; Polkinghorne RJ; Pethick DW
    Animal; 2013 Mar; 7(3):524-9. PubMed ID: 23031268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance, purchase intention, and willingness to pay for high quality United States and Spanish beef under different information scenarios.
    Beriain MJ; Sánchez M; Carr TR
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Oct; 87(10):3392-402. PubMed ID: 19542506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. European conformation and fat scores have no relationship with eating quality.
    Bonny SP; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Hocquette JF; Gardner GE
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):996-1006. PubMed ID: 26755183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. USA millennial and non-millennial beef consumers perception of beef, pork, and chicken.
    Laird HL; Miller RK; Kerth CR; Berto MC; Adhikari K
    Meat Sci; 2024 Aug; 214():109516. PubMed ID: 38678864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minor differences in perceived sheepmeat eating quality scores of Australian, Chinese and American consumers.
    O'Reilly RA; Pannier L; Gardner GE; Garmyn AJ; Luo H; Meng Q; Miller MF; Pethick DW
    Meat Sci; 2020 Jun; 164():108060. PubMed ID: 32142994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.