755 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28190457)
1. Public Attitudes toward Consent and Data Sharing in Biobank Research: A Large Multi-site Experimental Survey in the US.
Sanderson SC; Brothers KB; Mercaldo ND; Clayton EW; Antommaria AHM; Aufox SA; Brilliant MH; Campos D; Carrell DS; Connolly J; Conway P; Fullerton SM; Garrison NA; Horowitz CR; Jarvik GP; Kaufman D; Kitchner TE; Li R; Ludman EJ; McCarty CA; McCormick JB; McManus VD; Myers MF; Scrol A; Williams JL; Shrubsole MJ; Schildcrout JS; Smith ME; Holm IA
Am J Hum Genet; 2017 Mar; 100(3):414-427. PubMed ID: 28190457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Parents' attitudes toward consent and data sharing in biobanks: A multisite experimental survey.
Antommaria AHM; Brothers KB; Myers JA; Feygin YB; Aufox SA; Brilliant MH; Conway P; Fullerton SM; Garrison NA; Horowitz CR; Jarvik GP; Li R; Ludman EJ; McCarty CA; McCormick JB; Mercaldo ND; Myers MF; Sanderson SC; Shrubsole MJ; Schildcrout JS; Williams JL; Smith ME; Clayton EW; Holm IA
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(3):128-142. PubMed ID: 30240342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.
Kaufman DJ; Murphy-Bollinger J; Scott J; Hudson KL
Am J Hum Genet; 2009 Nov; 85(5):643-54. PubMed ID: 19878915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Balancing the local and the universal in maintaining ethical access to a genomics biobank.
Heeney C; Kerr SM
BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):80. PubMed ID: 29282045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The moral concerns of biobank donors: the effect of non-welfare interests on willingness to donate.
De Vries RG; Tomlinson T; Kim HM; Krenz CD; Ryan KA; Lehpamer N; Kim SY
Life Sci Soc Policy; 2016; 12():3. PubMed ID: 26968989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fair Shares and Sharing Fairly: A Survey of Public Views on Open Science, Informed Consent and Participatory Research in Biobanking.
Joly Y; Dalpé G; So D; Birko S
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0129893. PubMed ID: 26154134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Best Practices for Human Biobank Ethics Review in China.
Liu S; Wang WC; Zhang H; Tong J; Zhang X; Chen P; Hu C
Biopreserv Biobank; 2020 Aug; 18(4):274-282. PubMed ID: 32429687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. To share or not to share: a randomized trial of consent for data sharing in genome research.
McGuire AL; Oliver JM; Slashinski MJ; Graves JL; Wang T; Kelly PA; Fisher W; Lau CC; Goss J; Okcu M; Treadwell-Deering D; Goldman AM; Noebels JL; Hilsenbeck SG
Genet Med; 2011 Nov; 13(11):948-55. PubMed ID: 21785360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Communicating Identifiability Risks to Biobank Donors.
Kasperbauer TJ; Gjerris M; Waldemar G; Sandøe P
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2018 Jan; 27(1):123-136. PubMed ID: 29214966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Research participants' perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis.
D'Abramo F; Schildmann J; Vollmann J
BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 16():60. PubMed ID: 26354520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient Perspectives About Decisions to Share Medical Data and Biospecimens for Research.
Kim J; Kim H; Bell E; Bath T; Paul P; Pham A; Jiang X; Zheng K; Ohno-Machado L
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Aug; 2(8):e199550. PubMed ID: 31433479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biobank Participants' Attitudes Toward Data Sharing and Privacy: The Role of Trust in Reducing Perceived Risks.
Kasperbauer TJ; Halverson C; Garcia A; Schwartz PH
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2022; 17(1-2):167-176. PubMed ID: 34779299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Public's attitudes on participation in a biobank for research: an Italian survey.
Porteri C; Pasqualetti P; Togni E; Parker M
BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Nov; 15():81. PubMed ID: 25425352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A proposed approach to informed consent for biobanks in China.
Liu M; Hu Q
Bioethics; 2014 May; 28(4):181-6. PubMed ID: 22762502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The privacy-reciprocity connection in biobanking: comparing German with UK strategies.
Hobbs A; Starkbaum J; Gottweis U; Wichmann HE; Gottweis H
Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(5):272-84. PubMed ID: 22722691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A qualitative study of participants' views on re-consent in a longitudinal biobank.
Dixon-Woods M; Kocman D; Brewster L; Willars J; Laurie G; Tarrant C
BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Mar; 18(1):22. PubMed ID: 28330487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biobanks and the Moral Concerns of Donors: A Democratic Deliberation.
De Vries RG; Ryan KA; Gordon L; Krenz CD; Tomlinson T; Jewell S; Kim SYH
Qual Health Res; 2019 Nov; 29(13):1942-1953. PubMed ID: 30095038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. "It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.
Moodley K; Singh S
BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):57. PubMed ID: 27724893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Active choice but not too active: public perspectives on biobank consent models.
Simon CM; L'heureux J; Murray JC; Winokur P; Weiner G; Newbury E; Shinkunas L; Zimmerman B
Genet Med; 2011 Sep; 13(9):821-31. PubMed ID: 21555942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States.
Garrison NA; Sathe NA; Antommaria AH; Holm IA; Sanderson SC; Smith ME; McPheeters ML; Clayton EW
Genet Med; 2016 Jul; 18(7):663-71. PubMed ID: 26583683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
