171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28190702)
1. Analysis of Low Appropriateness Score Exam Trends in Decision Support-based Radiology Order Entry System.
Gupta S; Klein K; Singh AH; Thrall JH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 May; 14(5):615-621. PubMed ID: 28190702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An electronic safety screening process during inpatient computerized physician order entry improves the efficiency of magnetic resonance imaging exams.
Schneider E; Ruggieri P; Fromwiller L; Underwood R; Gurland B; Yurkschatt C; Kubiak K; Obuchowski NA
Acad Radiol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1592-7. PubMed ID: 24200487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the Effect of Unstructured Clinical Information on Clinical Decision Support Appropriateness Ratings.
Moriarity AK; Green A; Klochko C; O'Brien M; Halabi S
J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Jun; 14(6):737-743. PubMed ID: 28434848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiology order entry with decision support: initial clinical experience.
Rosenthal DI; Weilburg JB; Schultz T; Miller JC; Nixon V; Dreyer KJ; Thrall JH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Oct; 3(10):799-806. PubMed ID: 17412171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Increasing the appropriateness of outpatient imaging: effects of a barrier to ordering low-yield examinations.
Vartanians VM; Sistrom CL; Weilburg JB; Rosenthal DI; Thrall JH
Radiology; 2010 Jun; 255(3):842-9. PubMed ID: 20501721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Day in the Life of MRI: The Variety and Appropriateness of Exams Being Performed in Canada.
Vanderby S; Badea A; Peña Sánchez JN; Kalra N; Babyn P
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2018 May; 69(2):151-161. PubMed ID: 29198819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of clinical decision support for advanced inpatient imaging.
Moriarity AK; Klochko C; O'Brien M; Halabi S
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Apr; 12(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 25622766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MRI order appropriateness for chronic neck pain: Comparison of ordering practices and treatment outcomes for primary care physicians and specialists.
Romero A; Lynch D; Johnson E; Zhu X; Kirkpatrick J
J Orthop Res; 2024 Feb; 42(2):425-433. PubMed ID: 37525551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized Clinical Trial of a Clinical Decision Support Tool for Improving the Appropriateness Scores for Ordering Imaging Studies in Primary and Specialty Care Ambulatory Clinics.
Palen TE; Sharpe RE; Shetterly SM; Steiner JF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Nov; 213(5):1015-1020. PubMed ID: 31310183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. JOURNAL CLUB: Radiologists' Perceptions of Computerized Decision Support: A Focus Group Study From the Medicare Imaging Demonstration Project.
Lee CI; Khodyakov D; Weidmer BA; Wenger NS; Timbie JW; Brantley B; Burgette LF; Leuschner KJ; Hussey PS; Kahn KL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):947-55. PubMed ID: 26496542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of computerized order entry with integrated decision support on the growth of outpatient procedure volumes: seven-year time series analysis.
Sistrom CL; Dang PA; Weilburg JB; Dreyer KJ; Rosenthal DI; Thrall JH
Radiology; 2009 Apr; 251(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 19221058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging regulatory methods in the Israeli Air Force.
Levy G; Goldstein L; Paz I; Atar E; Olsha S; Goldberg A; Bar Dayan Y
Mil Med; 2007 May; 172(5):478-81. PubMed ID: 17521093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Appropriateness of imaging procedure requests: do radiologists agree?
Kahn CE; Michalski TA; Erickson SJ; Foley WD; Krasnow AZ; Lofgren RP; Quiroz FA; Rand SD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jul; 169(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 9207492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploring the impact of diagnostic imaging decision support embedded in an electronic referral solution on the appropriate ordering of magnetic resonance imaging for patients with knee pain: a retrospective chart review.
Mohammed HT; Payson LA; Gillan C; Mathews J; Diep J; Sadri-Gerrior J; Hamann K; Brodrecht D
J Eval Clin Pract; 2022 Apr; 28(2):247-259. PubMed ID: 34514681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inappropriate CT examinations: how much, who and where? Insights from a clinical decision support system (CDSS) analysis.
Rosen S; Singer C; Vaknin S; Kaim A; Luxenburg O; Makori A; Goldberg N; Rad M; Gitman S; Saban M
Eur Radiol; 2023 Nov; 33(11):7796-7804. PubMed ID: 37646812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical decision support: the role of ACR Appropriateness Criteria.
Chan SS; Francavilla ML; Iyer RS; Rigsby CK; Kurth D; Karmazyn BK
Pediatr Radiol; 2019 Apr; 49(4):479-485. PubMed ID: 30923879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiology order decision support: examination-indication appropriateness assessed using 2 electronic systems.
Schneider E; Zelenka S; Grooff P; Alexa D; Bullen J; Obuchowski NA
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Apr; 12(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 25842015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria and EURO-2000 Guidelines Offer Limited Guidance for MRI Imaging of Pediatric Patients.
Simoni P; Kozlowski L; Boitsios G; De Angelis R; De Leucio A
Acad Radiol; 2023 Sep; 30(9):1991-1999. PubMed ID: 36572626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Appropriateness and imaging utilization: "computerized provider order entry and decision support".
Thrall JH
Acad Radiol; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1083-7. PubMed ID: 25107862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reducing Inappropriate Lumbar Spine MRI for Low Back Pain: Radiology Support, Communication and Alignment Network.
Wang KY; Yen CJ; Chen M; Variyam D; Acosta TU; Reed B; Wintermark M; Lincoln CM
J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Jan; 15(1 Pt A):116-122. PubMed ID: 28969974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
