389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28190760)
21. Safety Profile and Predictors of Aesthetic Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix.
Belmonte BM; Campbell CA
Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jun; 86(6S Suppl 5):S585-S592. PubMed ID: 34100818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Revising Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Goodreau AM; Driscoll CR; Nye A; Nigro LC; Blanchet NP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Mar; 149(3):579-584. PubMed ID: 35196671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Evolving Role of Pre-pectoral ADM-assisted Approach in Implant-based Immediate Breast Reconstruction Following Conservative Mastectomy: An Overview of the Literature and Description of Technique.
Wazir U; Mokbel K
In Vivo; 2018; 32(6):1477-1480. PubMed ID: 30348704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A Prospective Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Subpectoral and Prepectoral Strattice-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Baker BG; Irri R; MacCallum V; Chattopadhyay R; Murphy J; Harvey JR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 May; 141(5):1077-1084. PubMed ID: 29697602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A Critical Appraisal of Late Complications of Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
King CA; Bartholomew AJ; Sosin M; Avila A; Famiglietti AL; Dekker PK; Perez-Alvarez IM; Song DH; Fan KL; Tousimis EA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 28(13):9150-9158. PubMed ID: 34386913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Broad Application of Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix Drape and Fluorescent Imaging in a Community Setting.
Bilezikian JA; Tenzel PL; Bebb GG; Kays CR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Feb; 145(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 31985606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Understanding the Evidence and Improving Outcomes with Implant-Based Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Campbell CA; Losken A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Sep; 148(3):437e-450e. PubMed ID: 34432700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Mirhaidari SJ; Azouz V; Wagner DS
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Mar; 84(3):263-270. PubMed ID: 31663934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Renaissance of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: theoretical basis and research status].
Lin W; Chen J; Tan Q
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Feb; 37(2):233-239. PubMed ID: 36796822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Current Global Trends in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Taj S; Chandavarkar R; Vidya R
Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Mar; 60(3):. PubMed ID: 38541157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A prospective comparison study of early functional outcomes after implant-based breast reconstruction: subpectoral versus prepectoral technique.
Lee JS; Park E; Lee JH; Lee J; Park HY; Yang JD; Jung TD
Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Mar; 10(3):2520-2529. PubMed ID: 33691448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A retrospective comparative analysis of risk factors and outcomes in direct-to-implant and two-stages prepectoral breast reconstruction: BMI and radiotherapy as new selection criteria of patients.
Casella D; Di Taranto G; Onesti MG; Greco M; Ribuffo D
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1357-1363. PubMed ID: 30827802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. ADM-assisted prepectoral breast reconstruction and skin reduction mastectomy: Expanding the indications for subcutaneous reconstruction.
Onesti MG; Di Taranto G; Ribuffo D; Scuderi N
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Apr; 73(4):673-680. PubMed ID: 31812442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing and Skin-Sparing Mastectomy in Breast-Augmented Patients: Prepectoral or Submuscular Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction?
Salgarello M; Fabbri M; Visconti G; Barone Adesi L
Aesthet Surg J; 2024 Apr; 44(5):503-515. PubMed ID: 38150292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prepectoral versus Submuscular Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Comparison of Outcomes.
Talwar AA; Lanni MA; Ryan IA; Kodali P; Bernstein E; McAuliffe PB; Broach RB; Serletti JM; Butler PD; Fosnot J
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Feb; 153(2):281e-290e. PubMed ID: 37159266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Splitting the Difference: Using Synthetic and Biologic Mesh to Decrease Cost in Prepectoral Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction.
Karp NS; Salibian AA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):580-584. PubMed ID: 33620924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. One-stage muscle-sparing breast reconstruction in elderly patients: A new tool for retaining excellent quality of life.
Maruccia M; Di Taranto G; Onesti MG
Breast J; 2018 Mar; 24(2):180-183. PubMed ID: 28703387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prepectoral Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix: Do We See a Difference?
Manrique OJ; Huang TC; Martinez-Jorge J; Ciudad P; Forte AJ; Bustos SS; Boughey JC; Jakub JW; Degnim AC; Galan R
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Feb; 145(2):263e-272e. PubMed ID: 31985613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Important Considerations for Performing Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Sbitany H
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):7S-13S. PubMed ID: 29166342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Optimizing Outcomes in 2-Stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Utilizing Round Form-Stable Implants.
Sbitany H; Lee KR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jul; 144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery):43S-50S. PubMed ID: 31246760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
