BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28192132)

  • 1. Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2017 May; 173():188-199. PubMed ID: 28192132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fructose- and glucose-conditioned preferences in FVB mice: strain differences in post-oral sugar appetition.
    Sclafani A; Zukerman S; Ackroff K
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2014 Dec; 307(12):R1448-57. PubMed ID: 25320345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J Mice Differ in Their Oral and Postoral Attraction to Glucose and Fructose.
    Sclafani A; Vural AS; Ackroff K
    Chem Senses; 2017 Mar; 42(3):259-267. PubMed ID: 28158517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. BALB/c and SWR inbred mice differ in post-oral fructose appetition as revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests.
    Kraft TT; Huang D; Lolier M; Warshaw D; LaMagna S; Natanova E; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Jan; 153():64-9. PubMed ID: 26485292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
    Pinhas A; Aviel M; Koen M; Gurgov S; Acosta V; Israel M; Kakuriev L; Guskova E; Fuzailov I; Touzani K; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Jan; 105(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 21945373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flavor preference conditioning by different sugars in sweet ageusic Trpm5 knockout mice.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Mar; 140():156-63. PubMed ID: 25497884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differential fructose and glucose appetition in DBA/2, 129P3 and C57BL/6 × 129P3 hybrid mice revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests.
    Nashed M; Castillo A; Roland M; Carata I; Berglas E; Pines R; Riaz S; Morisset BJ; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
    Physiol Behav; 2021 Nov; 241():113590. PubMed ID: 34509472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gut T1R3 sweet taste receptors do not mediate sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
    Sclafani A; Glass DS; Margolskee RF; Glendinning JI
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2010 Dec; 299(6):R1643-50. PubMed ID: 20926763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fat and sugar flavor preference and acceptance in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: experience attenuates strain differences.
    Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Mar; 90(4):602-11. PubMed ID: 17210165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ghrelin signaling is not essential for sugar or fat conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
    Sclafani A; Touzani K; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Oct; 149():14-22. PubMed ID: 26003495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MCH receptor deletion does not impair glucose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
    Sclafani A; Adamantidis A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Sep; 163():239-244. PubMed ID: 27195455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conditioned preference and avoidance induced in mice by the rare sugars isomaltulose and allulose.
    Sclafani A; Castillo A; Carata I; Pines R; Berglas E; Joseph S; Sarker J; Nashed M; Roland M; Arzayus S; Williams N; Glendinning JI; Bodnar RJ
    Physiol Behav; 2023 Aug; 267():114221. PubMed ID: 37146897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Postoral glucose sensing, not caloric content, determines sugar reward in C57BL/6J mice.
    Sclafani A; Zukerman S; Ackroff K
    Chem Senses; 2015 May; 40(4):245-58. PubMed ID: 25715333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Glucose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats: taste versus postingestive conditioning.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 1994 Aug; 56(2):399-405. PubMed ID: 7938256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric glucose but not fructose or galactose in C57BL/6J mice.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Jun; 106(4):457-61. PubMed ID: 22445944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid post-oral stimulation of intake and flavor conditioning by glucose and fat in the mouse.
    Zukerman S; Ackroff K; Sclafani A
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2011 Dec; 301(6):R1635-47. PubMed ID: 21975648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prior exposure to nutritive and artificial sweeteners differentially alters the magnitude and persistence of sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in BALB/c and C57BL/6 inbred mouse strains.
    LaMagna S; Olsson K; Warshaw D; Fazilov G; Iskhakov B; Buras A; Bodnar RJ
    Nutr Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 22(10):706-717. PubMed ID: 29415638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Profound differences in fat versus carbohydrate preferences in CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J mice: Role of fat taste.
    Sclafani A; Vural AS; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2018 Oct; 194():348-355. PubMed ID: 29933030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Post-oral glucose stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: a concentration-response study.
    Zukerman S; Ackroff K; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2013 Jan; 109():33-41. PubMed ID: 23200639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sugar and fat conditioned flavor preferences in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: oral and postoral interactions.
    Sclafani A; Glendinning JI
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2005 Sep; 289(3):R712-20. PubMed ID: 15845881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.