These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28192349)

  • 1. Development of a model for activated sludge aeration systems: linking air supply, distribution, and demand.
    Schraa O; Rieger L; Alex J
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 75(3-4):552-560. PubMed ID: 28192349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Towards advanced aeration modelling: from blower to bubbles to bulk.
    Amaral A; Schraa O; Rieger L; Gillot S; Fayolle Y; Bellandi G; Amerlinck Y; Mortier ST; Gori R; Neves R; Nopens I
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 75(3-4):507-517. PubMed ID: 28192345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Linking biofilm growth to fouling and aeration performance of fine-pore diffuser in activated sludge.
    Garrido-Baserba M; Asvapathanagul P; McCarthy GW; Gocke TE; Olson BH; Park HD; Al-Omari A; Murthy S; Bott CB; Wett B; Smeraldi JD; Shaw AR; Rosso D
    Water Res; 2016 Mar; 90():317-328. PubMed ID: 26760484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A realistic dynamic blower energy consumption model for wastewater applications.
    Amerlinck Y; De Keyser W; Urchegui G; Nopens I
    Water Sci Technol; 2016 Oct; 74(7):1561-1576. PubMed ID: 27763336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oxygen transfer improvement in MBBR process.
    Collivignarelli MC; Abbà A; Bertanza G
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Apr; 26(11):10727-10737. PubMed ID: 30778935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Applying fine bubble aeration to small aeration tanks.
    Duchène P; Cotteux E; Capela S
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(2-3):203-10. PubMed ID: 11547985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic air supply models add realism to the evaluation of control strategies in water resource recovery facilities.
    Juan-García P; Kiser MA; Schraa O; Rieger L; Corominas L
    Water Sci Technol; 2018 Oct; 78(5-6):1104-1114. PubMed ID: 30339535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modelling solution for estimating aeration energy of wastewater treatment plants.
    Pöyry L; Ukkonen P; Mulas M; Mikola A
    Water Sci Technol; 2021 Dec; 84(12):3941-3951. PubMed ID: 34928854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of diffuser pressure loss on WWTPs in Baden-Württemberg.
    Krampe J
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(12):3027-33. PubMed ID: 22049734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved design and optimization of aeration control for WWTPs by dynamic simulation.
    Alex J; To TB; Hartwig P
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(4-5):365-72. PubMed ID: 11936654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost minimization in a full-scale conventional wastewater treatment plant: associated costs of biological energy consumption versus sludge production.
    Sid S; Volant A; Lesage G; Heran M
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 76(9-10):2473-2481. PubMed ID: 29144305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Energy, cost and design aspects of coarse- and fine-bubble aeration systems in the MBBR IFAS process.
    Sander S; Behnisch J; Wagner M
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 75(3-4):890-897. PubMed ID: 28234289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modelling oxygen transfer using dynamic alpha factors.
    Jiang LM; Garrido-Baserba M; Nolasco D; Al-Omari A; DeClippeleir H; Murthy S; Rosso D
    Water Res; 2017 Nov; 124():139-148. PubMed ID: 28753496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Towards improved accuracy in modeling aeration efficiency through understanding bubble size distribution dynamics.
    Amaral A; Bellandi G; Rehman U; Neves R; Amerlinck Y; Nopens I
    Water Res; 2018 Mar; 131():346-355. PubMed ID: 29305229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-level multivariable control system of dissolved oxygen tracking and aeration system for activated sludge processes.
    Piotrowski R
    Water Environ Res; 2015 Jan; 87(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 25630122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Critical Review of the Factors Affecting Modeling Oxygen Transfer by Fine-Pore Diffusers in Activated Sludge.
    Baquero-Rodríguez GA; Lara-Borrero JA; Nolasco D; Rosso D
    Water Environ Res; 2018 May; 90(5):431-441. PubMed ID: 29678214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Towards more accurate design and specification of aeration systems using on-site column testing.
    Rosso D; Jiang LM; Hayden DM; Pitt P; Hocking CS; Murthy S; Stenstrom MK
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(3):627-34. PubMed ID: 22744695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the efficiency of large-scale ceramic and membrane aeration systems with the dynamic off-gas method.
    Libra JA; Schuchardt A; Sahlmann C; Handschag J; Wiesmann U; Gnirss R
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):317-24. PubMed ID: 12361027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal aeration control in a nitrifying activated sludge process.
    Amand L; Carlsson B
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(7):2101-10. PubMed ID: 22341831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Model based evaluation of plant improvement at a large wastewater treatment plant (WWTP).
    Drewnowski J; Remiszewska-Skwarek A; Fernandez-Morales FJ
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2018 Jun; 53(7):669-675. PubMed ID: 29465297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.