These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28192565)

  • 1. Acknowledging and Overcoming Nonreproducibility in Basic and Preclinical Research.
    Ioannidis JP
    JAMA; 2017 Mar; 317(10):1019-1020. PubMed ID: 28192565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The distortion of commercial research reported in the peer-reviewed literature.
    Liesegang TJ
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 44(4):367-9. PubMed ID: 19606153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Twenty statistical errors even you can find in biomedical research articles.
    Lang T
    Croat Med J; 2004 Aug; 45(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 15311405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Documenting the methods history: would it improve the interpretability of studies?
    Krumholz HM
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2012 Jul; 5(4):418-9. PubMed ID: 22811497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Be-(a)-ware of the red flags: common flaws of nonreproducible preclinical research studies.
    Korpi-Steiner N; Molinaro R
    Clin Chem; 2014 Feb; 60(2):427. PubMed ID: 24620366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Introducing prospective manuscript review to address publication bias.
    Mell LK; Zietman AL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Nov; 90(4):729-32. PubMed ID: 25585776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Guidelines for reporting of statistics in European Urology.
    Vickers AJ; Sjoberg DD;
    Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 25037638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The value of statistical analysis plans in observational research: defining high-quality research from the start.
    Thomas L; Peterson ED
    JAMA; 2012 Aug; 308(8):773-4. PubMed ID: 22910753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Editorial: Curiosity Versus Criticism in Scientific Publication.
    Maltenfort M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jun; 474(6):1353-5. PubMed ID: 26920570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study design and statistical analysis.
    Elston DM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2018 Aug; 79(2):207. PubMed ID: 29128448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Caution regarding the use of pilot studies to guide power calculations for study proposals.
    Kraemer HC; Mintz J; Noda A; Tinklenberg J; Yesavage JA
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2006 May; 63(5):484-9. PubMed ID: 16651505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Data presentation and the use of statistical tests in biomedical journals: can we reach a consensus?
    Evans RG; Su DF
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2011 May; 38(5):285-6. PubMed ID: 21388434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Replicability, Reproducibility, and Fragility of Research Findings-Ultimately, Caveat Emptor.
    Vetter TR; McGwin G; Pittet JF
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Jul; 123(1):244-8. PubMed ID: 27183372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. European Urology: serving our readership through systematic peer review, use of reporting standards, and encouragement of postpublication review.
    Catto JW; Cooperberg MR; Cornu JN; Gratzke C; Novara G; Shariat SF; Vickers A
    Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 25175422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Major Sources of Bias.
    Meuli L; Dick F
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2018 May; 55(5):736. PubMed ID: 29525740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Passive smoking and replication.
    Ebers G
    Eur J Neurol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1263-4. PubMed ID: 19049541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Bayesian approach to mitigation of publication bias.
    Guan M; Vandekerckhove J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 26126776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transparent reporting for reproducible science.
    Weissgerber TL; Garovic VD; Winham SJ; Milic NM; Prager EM
    J Neurosci Res; 2016 Oct; 94(10):859-64. PubMed ID: 27377972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do as you would be done by: write as you would wish to read.
    Drummond GB; Vowler SL
    Exp Physiol; 2013 Feb; 98(2):355-8. PubMed ID: 23349529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Matters of significance.
    Nat Methods; 2013 Sep; 10(9):805. PubMed ID: 24143819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.