These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28192600)

  • 1. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on psoriasis: role of funding sources, conflict of interest and bibliometric indices as predictors of methodological quality.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Gay-Mimbrera J; Maestre-Lopez B; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Carmona-Fernández PJ; González-Padilla M; Vélez García-Nieto A; Isla-Tejera B
    Br J Dermatol; 2017 Jun; 176(6):1633-1644. PubMed ID: 28192600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Author-paper affiliation network architecture influences the methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of psoriasis.
    Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Ruano J; Gomez-Garcia F; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Maestre-Lopez B; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Velez Garcia-Nieto A; Isla-Tejera B
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175419. PubMed ID: 28403245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer.
    Goldkuhle M; Narayan VM; Weigl A; Dahm P; Skoetz N
    BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020869. PubMed ID: 29581210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination.
    Remschmidt C; Wichmann O; Harder T
    Vaccine; 2014 Mar; 32(15):1678-84. PubMed ID: 24513008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Most systematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias using ROBIS tool.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Alcalde-Mellado P; Maestre-López B; Carmona-Fernández PJ; González-Padilla M; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 92():79-88. PubMed ID: 28893571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.
    Ruano J; Gómez-García F; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Alcalde-Mellado P; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Viguera-Guerra I; Franco-García F; Cárdenas-Aranzana M; Romero JLH; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Isla-Tejera B; Garcia-Nieto AV
    Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 29523200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reporting of drug trial funding sources and author financial conflicts of interest in Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses: a cross-sectional study.
    Turner K; Carboni-Jiménez A; Benea C; Elder K; Levis B; Boruff J; Roseman M; Bero L; Lexchin J; Turner EH; Benedetti A; Thombs BD
    BMJ Open; 2020 May; 10(5):e035633. PubMed ID: 32398334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Published in High-Impact Otolaryngology Journals.
    Martinez-Monedero R; Danielian A; Angajala V; Dinalo JE; Kezirian EJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Nov; 163(5):892-905. PubMed ID: 32450783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.
    DiSilvestro KJ; Tjoumakaris FP; Maltenfort MG; Spindler KP; Freedman KB
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):533-8. PubMed ID: 25899433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inflammatory bowel disease meta-evidence and its challenges: is it time to restructure surgical research?
    Delaney J; Laws P; Wille-Jørgensen P; Engel A
    Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jul; 17(7):600-11. PubMed ID: 25546572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of publication bias in meta-analyses of cardiovascular diseases.
    Palma S; Delgado-Rodriguez M
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Oct; 59(10):864-9. PubMed ID: 16166360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study.
    Chung VCH; Wu XY; Feng Y; Ho RST; Wong SYS; Threapleton D
    Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2018 Dec; 27(6):619-627. PubMed ID: 28462754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Poor reporting of search strategy and conflict of interest in over 250 narrative and systematic reviews of two biologic agents in arthritis: a systematic review.
    Roundtree AK; Kallen MA; Lopez-Olivo MA; Kimmel B; Skidmore B; Ortiz Z; Cox V; Suarez-Almazor ME
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 62(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 19013763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality.
    Fleming PS; Koletsi D; Seehra J; Pandis N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 67(7):754-9. PubMed ID: 24709031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longitudinal analysis of reporting and quality of systematic reviews in high-impact surgical journals.
    Chapman SJ; Drake TM; Bolton WS; Barnard J; Bhangu A
    Br J Surg; 2017 Feb; 104(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 28001294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on tuberculosis.
    Nicolau I; Ling D; Tian L; Lienhardt C; Pai M
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2013 Sep; 17(9):1160-9. PubMed ID: 23809432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-analyses in Endodontics.
    Kattan S; Lee SM; Kohli MR; Setzer FC; Karabucak B
    J Endod; 2018 Jan; 44(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 29032820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Appraising the Quality of Systematic Reviews for Age-Related Macular Degeneration Interventions: A Systematic Review.
    Downie LE; Makrai E; Bonggotgetsakul Y; Dirito LJ; Kristo K; Pham MN; You M; Verspoor K; Pianta MJ
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 136(9):1051-1061. PubMed ID: 29978192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.