These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28192614)
1. Cone-beam CT-based adaptive planning improves permanent prostate brachytherapy dosimetry: An analysis of 1266 patients. Westendorp H; Hoekstra CJ; Immerzeel JJ; van de Pol SM; Niël CG; Kattevilder RA; Nuver TT; Minken AW; Moerland MA Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1257-1267. PubMed ID: 28192614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation between real-time intraoperative and postoperative dosimetry and its implications on intraoperative planning. Yan C; Huq MS; Heron DE; Beriwal S; Wynn RB Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(3):338-347. PubMed ID: 30655047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate brachytherapy intraoperative dosimetry using a combination of radiographic seed localization with a C-arm and deformed ultrasound prostate contours. Golshan M; Mahdavi SS; Samei G; Lobo J; Pickles T; James Morris W; Keyes M; Peacock M; Salcudean SE; Spadinger I Brachytherapy; 2020; 19(5):589-598. PubMed ID: 32682777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Intraoperative and post-implant dosimetry in patients treated with permanent prostate implant brachytherapy]. Herein A; Ágoston P; Szabó Z; Jorgo K; Markgruber B; Pesznyák C; Polgár C; Major T Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 26035163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose. Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adaptive cone-beam CT planning improves long-term biochemical disease-free survival for Peters M; Smit Duijzentkunst DA; Westendorp H; van de Pol SMG; Kattevilder R; Schellekens A; van der Voort van Zyp JRN; Moerland MA; van Vulpen M; Hoekstra CJ Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(2):282-290. PubMed ID: 28110899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Real-time intraoperative evaluation of implant quality and dose correction during prostate brachytherapy consistently improves target coverage using a novel image fusion and optimization program. Zelefsky MJ; Cohen GN; Taggar AS; Kollmeier M; McBride S; Mageras G; Zaider M Pract Radiat Oncol; 2017; 7(5):319-324. PubMed ID: 28377139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CT-ultrasound fusion prostate brachytherapy: a dynamic dosimetry feedback and improvement method. A report of 54 consecutive cases. Fuller DB; Jin H; Koziol JA; Feng AC Brachytherapy; 2005; 4(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 16182221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric impact of contouring and image registration variability on dynamic Westendorp H; Surmann K; van de Pol SMG; Hoekstra CJ; Kattevilder RAJ; Nuver TT; Moerland MA; Slump CH; Minken AW Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(3):572-578. PubMed ID: 28242194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computing intraoperative dosimetry for prostate brachytherapy using TRUS and fluoroscopy. French D; Morris J; Keyes M; Goksel O; Salcudean S Acad Radiol; 2005 Oct; 12(10):1262-72. PubMed ID: 16179203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Poor predictive value of intraoperative real-time dosimetry for prostate seed brachytherapy. Igidbashian L; Donath D; Carrier JF; Lassalle S; Hervieux Y; David S; Bahary JP; Taussky D Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Oct; 72(2):605-9. PubMed ID: 18793964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phase II study of intraoperative dosimetry for prostate brachytherapy using registered ultrasound and fluoroscopy. Lee J; Hobbs RF; Zahurak M; Ng SK; Zhang Z; Burdette EC; DeWeese TL; Song DY Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(6):858-865. PubMed ID: 30217432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric impact of interfraction catheter movement in high-dose rate prostate brachytherapy. Foster W; Cunha JA; Hsu IC; Weinberg V; Krishnamurthy D; Pouliot J Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 May; 80(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 20605353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity of clinically relevant dosimetric parameters to contouring uncertainty in postimplant dosimetry of low-dose-rate prostate permanent seed brachytherapy. Mashouf S; Safigholi H; Merino T; Soliman A; Ravi A; Morton G; Song WY Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(6):774-779. PubMed ID: 27720310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Live implant dosimetry may be an effective replacement for postimplant computed tomography in localized prostate cancer patients receiving low dose rate brachytherapy. Roshan D; Joyce K; Woulfe P; Gorakati PR; Stock R; Sullivan FJ Brachytherapy; 2021; 20(4):873-882. PubMed ID: 33840634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is intraoperative nomogram-based overplanning of prostate implants necessary? D'Souza WD; Lee HK; Palmer MB; Smith LG; Pollack A Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Jun; 56(2):462-7. PubMed ID: 12738321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Loose versus stranded seeds in permanent prostate brachytherapy: dosimetric comparison of intraoperative plans. Major T; Agoston P; Fröhlich G; Baricza K; Szabo Z; Jorgo K; Herein A; Polgar C Phys Med; 2014 Dec; 30(8):909-13. PubMed ID: 25175151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]