194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2819298)
21. Effects of recent neptunium studies on high-level waste hazard assessments.
Cohen BL
Health Phys; 1983 May; 44(5):567-9. PubMed ID: 6853177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Fukushima revives the low-dose debate.
Normile D
Science; 2011 May; 332(6032):908-10. PubMed ID: 21596968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Radiation load--is there a threshold dose?].
Grüter H
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1980 Jun; 105(24):841-3. PubMed ID: 7418613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Defining the boundaries of "personal injury": Rainer v. Union Carbide Corp.
Sen M
Stanford Law Rev; 2006 Feb; 58(4):1251-66. PubMed ID: 16685808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Possible links between radioactive discharges and cancer.
Aldrich R
J Nucl Med; 1991 Sep; 32(9):1827. PubMed ID: 1880589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Concerns with low level ionizing radiation: rational or phobic?
Yalow RS
J Nucl Med; 1990 Jul; 31(7):17A-18A, 26A. PubMed ID: 2362209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [The combined action of external and internal sources of ionizing radiation on the body].
Petriuk SE
Vrach Delo; 1991 Oct; (10):20-3. PubMed ID: 1803738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluating the safety of the proposed waste repository at Yucca mountain.
Thorne MC
Health Phys; 2010 May; 98(5):745-6; author reply 746-7. PubMed ID: 20386205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Radiation exposure and pregnancy].
Hinz G; Kaul A
Gynakologe; 1987 Sep; 20(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 3678983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Radiation and pregnancy. Putting the risks in proportion.
Jankowski CB
Am J Nurs; 1986 Mar; 86(3):260-5. PubMed ID: 3513577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Methodology of evaluation and indicators of radiological risk].
Liniecki J
Pol Przegl Radiol; 1985; 49(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 3913930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Exposure to radioactive iodine in pregnancy: significance for mother and child].
Ogris E
Acta Med Austriaca; 1997; 24(4):150-3. PubMed ID: 9441552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Radiation risks are evaluated. There is no totally harmless level].
Persson L
Lakartidningen; 1990 Apr; 87(15):1264, 1266. PubMed ID: 2325499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Old and new aspects of radiation protection in x-ray diagnosis].
Frik W
Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1985; 26():83-96. PubMed ID: 3911501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Biological effects from radioactive fall-out.
Casarett AP; Thompson JC
Prog Biometeorol; 1974; 1(1A):356-64, 670-2. PubMed ID: 4438661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Linear dose-effect relationship for the radiation and chemical risk].
Demin VF
Gig Sanit; 2003; (6):37-9. PubMed ID: 14735737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Consequences of the Chernobyl accident are difficult to prove. Thyroid gland cancer among those who were exposed to radiation during childhood is the only disease evidently connected to the radiation so far].
Sokolowski E
Lakartidningen; 2002 Jan; 99(5):418-20. PubMed ID: 11881248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [The "limit-exceeding risk" in nuclear technics. Supplement to the article "Risk analysis in nuclear technics"].
Bayer A
Fortschr Med; 1981 Dec; 99(45):1905-7. PubMed ID: 7308959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Nuclear waste. 'Hot' legacy raises alarm in the Caucasus.
Stone R
Science; 2002 Feb; 295(5556):777-9. PubMed ID: 11823610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [The radiation accident].
Stögmann W
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1988 Aug; 100(16):542-6. PubMed ID: 3188527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
