383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28193155)
1. A comparison of reference-based algorithms for correcting cell-type heterogeneity in Epigenome-Wide Association Studies.
Teschendorff AE; Breeze CE; Zheng SC; Beck S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 18(1):105. PubMed ID: 28193155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of epithelial cell content of oral samples estimated using cytology and DNA methylation.
Wong YT; Tayeb MA; Stone TC; Lovat LB; Teschendorff AE; Iwasiow R; Craig JM
Epigenetics; 2022 Mar; 17(3):327-334. PubMed ID: 34254878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cell-type deconvolution in epigenome-wide association studies: a review and recommendations.
Teschendorff AE; Zheng SC
Epigenomics; 2017 May; 9(5):757-768. PubMed ID: 28517979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of differentially methylated cell types in epigenome-wide association studies.
Zheng SC; Breeze CE; Beck S; Teschendorff AE
Nat Methods; 2018 Dec; 15(12):1059-1066. PubMed ID: 30504870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cell-type deconvolution meta-analysis of whole blood EWAS reveals lineage-specific smoking-associated DNA methylation changes.
You C; Wu S; Zheng SC; Zhu T; Jing H; Flagg K; Wang G; Jin L; Wang S; Teschendorff AE
Nat Commun; 2020 Sep; 11(1):4779. PubMed ID: 32963246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cell-Type Deconvolution of Bulk DNA Methylation Data with EpiSCORE.
Zhu T; Teschendorff AE
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2629():23-42. PubMed ID: 36929072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sparse PCA corrects for cell type heterogeneity in epigenome-wide association studies.
Rahmani E; Zaitlen N; Baran Y; Eng C; Hu D; Galanter J; Oh S; Burchard EG; Eskin E; Zou J; Halperin E
Nat Methods; 2016 May; 13(5):443-5. PubMed ID: 27018579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correcting for Sample Heterogeneity in Methylome-Wide Association Studies.
Zou JY
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1589():107-114. PubMed ID: 26246354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EWAS: epigenome-wide association study software 2.0.
Xu J; Zhao L; Liu D; Hu S; Song X; Li J; Lv H; Duan L; Zhang M; Jiang Q; Liu G; Jin S; Liao M; Zhang M; Feng R; Kong F; Xu L; Jiang Y
Bioinformatics; 2018 Aug; 34(15):2657-2658. PubMed ID: 29566144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving cell mixture deconvolution by identifying optimal DNA methylation libraries (IDOL).
Koestler DC; Jones MJ; Usset J; Christensen BC; Butler RA; Kobor MS; Wiencke JK; Kelsey KT
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 17():120. PubMed ID: 26956433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. eFORGE: A Tool for Identifying Cell Type-Specific Signal in Epigenomic Data.
Breeze CE; Paul DS; van Dongen J; Butcher LM; Ambrose JC; Barrett JE; Lowe R; Rakyan VK; Iotchkova V; Frontini M; Downes K; Ouwehand WH; Laperle J; Jacques PÉ; Bourque G; Bergmann AK; Siebert R; Vellenga E; Saeed S; Matarese F; Martens JHA; Stunnenberg HG; Teschendorff AE; Herrero J; Birney E; Dunham I; Beck S
Cell Rep; 2016 Nov; 17(8):2137-2150. PubMed ID: 27851974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. EPISCORE: cell type deconvolution of bulk tissue DNA methylomes from single-cell RNA-Seq data.
Teschendorff AE; Zhu T; Breeze CE; Beck S
Genome Biol; 2020 Sep; 21(1):221. PubMed ID: 32883324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS): past, present, and future.
Flanagan JM
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1238():51-63. PubMed ID: 25421654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Novel Framework for the Identification of Reference DNA Methylation Libraries for Reference-Based Deconvolution of Cellular Mixtures.
Bell-Glenn S; Thompson JA; Salas LA; Koestler DC
Front Bioinform; 2022; 2():. PubMed ID: 35419567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cell Type-Specific Signal Analysis in Epigenome-Wide Association Studies.
Breeze CE
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2432():57-71. PubMed ID: 35505207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating cell-type-specific DNA methylation effects in heterogeneous cellular populations.
Feng YA; Guo Y; Pain L; Lathrop GM; Laprise C; Moffatt MF; Cookson WO; Liang L
Epigenomics; 2021 Jan; 13(2):87-97. PubMed ID: 33350870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fast and robust adjustment of cell mixtures in epigenome-wide association studies with SmartSVA.
Chen J; Behnam E; Huang J; Moffatt MF; Schaid DJ; Liang L; Lin X
BMC Genomics; 2017 May; 18(1):413. PubMed ID: 28549425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of different cell type correction methods for genome-scale epigenetics studies.
Kaushal A; Zhang H; Karmaus WJJ; Ray M; Torres MA; Smith AK; Wang SL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 18(1):216. PubMed ID: 28410574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. EpiDISH web server: Epigenetic Dissection of Intra-Sample-Heterogeneity with online GUI.
Zheng SC; Breeze CE; Beck S; Dong D; Zhu T; Ma L; Ye W; Zhang G; Teschendorff AE
Bioinformatics; 2019 Nov; 36(6):1950-1. PubMed ID: 31710662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systematic evaluation and validation of reference and library selection methods for deconvolution of cord blood DNA methylation data.
Gervin K; Salas LA; Bakulski KM; van Zelm MC; Koestler DC; Wiencke JK; Duijts L; Moll HA; Kelsey KT; Kobor MS; Lyle R; Christensen BC; Felix JF; Jones MJ
Clin Epigenetics; 2019 Aug; 11(1):125. PubMed ID: 31455416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
