These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2819359)
21. Recent advances in screen-film mammography. Haus AG Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The x-ray sensitivity of amorphous selenium for mammography. Stone MF; Zhao W; Jacak BV; O'Connor P; Yu B; Rehak P Med Phys; 2002 Mar; 29(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 11929014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Review of relative biological effectiveness dependence on linear energy transfer for low-LET radiations. Hunter N; Muirhead CR J Radiol Prot; 2009 Mar; 29(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 19225189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The quality mammographic image. A review of its components. Rickard MT Australas Radiol; 1989 Nov; 33(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 2633732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography]. Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Review of Kerma-Area Product and total energy incident on patients in radiography, mammography and CT. Yao H; Huda W; Mah E; He W Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Feb; 163(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 24821931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Technologic improvements in screen-film mammography. Haus AG Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):628-37. PubMed ID: 2406777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography]. Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Grabbe E Rofo; 2000 Nov; 172(11):940-5. PubMed ID: 11142129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dependence of scatter on atomic number for x rays from tungsten and molybdenum anodes in the mammographic energy range. Aus RJ; DeWerd LA; Pearson DW; Micka JA; Ng KH Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1306-11. PubMed ID: 10435532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Monochromatic x-rays for low-dose digital mammography: preliminary results. Yoon KH; Kwon YM; Choi BJ; Son HH; Ryu CW; Chon KS; Park SH; Juhng SK Invest Radiol; 2012 Dec; 47(12):683-7. PubMed ID: 22996316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography. Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Enhanced biological effectiveness of low energy X-rays and implications for the UK breast screening programme. Redpath JL; Mitchel RE Br J Radiol; 2006 Oct; 79(946):854-5; author reply 855-7. PubMed ID: 16980679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography: a contrast detail phantom study. Chida K; Zuguchi M; Sai M; Saito H; Yamada T; Ishibashi T; Ito D; Kimoto N; Kohzuki M; Takahashi S Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 15967314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]