These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2819359)

  • 21. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The x-ray sensitivity of amorphous selenium for mammography.
    Stone MF; Zhao W; Jacak BV; O'Connor P; Yu B; Rehak P
    Med Phys; 2002 Mar; 29(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 11929014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Review of relative biological effectiveness dependence on linear energy transfer for low-LET radiations.
    Hunter N; Muirhead CR
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Mar; 29(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 19225189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The quality mammographic image. A review of its components.
    Rickard MT
    Australas Radiol; 1989 Nov; 33(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 2633732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
    Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography.
    Wu X; Barnes GT; Tucker DM
    Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 2006265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Grids in mammography.
    Egan RL; McSweeney MB; Sprawls P
    Radiology; 1983 Feb; 146(2):359-62. PubMed ID: 6849083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Review of Kerma-Area Product and total energy incident on patients in radiography, mammography and CT.
    Yao H; Huda W; Mah E; He W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Feb; 163(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 24821931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Technologic improvements in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):628-37. PubMed ID: 2406777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography].
    Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2000 Nov; 172(11):940-5. PubMed ID: 11142129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dependence of scatter on atomic number for x rays from tungsten and molybdenum anodes in the mammographic energy range.
    Aus RJ; DeWerd LA; Pearson DW; Micka JA; Ng KH
    Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1306-11. PubMed ID: 10435532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography.
    Wu X; Gingold EL; Barnes GT; Tucker DM
    Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 8090926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The reduction of radiation burden in mammography using film-screen combination systems].
    Waegner U; Geissler S; Rosenkranz G
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1990; 31(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 2277840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mammograms obtained with rhodium vs molybdenum anodes: contrast and dose differences.
    Kimme-Smith C; Wang J; DeBruhl N; Basic M; Bassett LW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jun; 162(6):1313-7. PubMed ID: 8191989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
    Gosch D; Jendrass S; Scholz M; Kahn T
    Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Radiographic mottle and patient exposure in mammography.
    Barnes GT; Chakraborty DP
    Radiology; 1982 Dec; 145(3):815-21. PubMed ID: 7146416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Monochromatic x-rays for low-dose digital mammography: preliminary results.
    Yoon KH; Kwon YM; Choi BJ; Son HH; Ryu CW; Chon KS; Park SH; Juhng SK
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Dec; 47(12):683-7. PubMed ID: 22996316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
    Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Enhanced biological effectiveness of low energy X-rays and implications for the UK breast screening programme.
    Redpath JL; Mitchel RE
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Oct; 79(946):854-5; author reply 855-7. PubMed ID: 16980679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography: a contrast detail phantom study.
    Chida K; Zuguchi M; Sai M; Saito H; Yamada T; Ishibashi T; Ito D; Kimoto N; Kohzuki M; Takahashi S
    Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 15967314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.