These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
444 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28194360)
1. Retreatability of two endodontic sealers, EndoSequence BC Sealer and AH Plus: a micro-computed tomographic comparison. Oltra E; Cox TC; LaCourse MR; Johnson JD; Paranjpe A Restor Dent Endod; 2017 Feb; 42(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 28194360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retreatability of BC Sealer and AH Plus root canal sealers using new supplementary instrumentation protocol during non-surgical endodontic retreatment. Crozeta BM; Lopes FC; Menezes Silva R; Silva-Sousa YTC; Moretti LF; Sousa-Neto MD Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Mar; 25(3):891-899. PubMed ID: 32506324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Push-out bond strength of root fillings made with C-Point and BC sealer versus gutta-percha and AH Plus after the instrumentation of oval canals with the Self-Adjusting File versus WaveOne. Pawar AM; Pawar S; Kfir A; Pawar M; Kokate S Int Endod J; 2016 Apr; 49(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 25827240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of single-cone obturation with three sealers. Zare S; Shen I; Zhu Q; Ahn C; Primus C; Komabayashi T Restor Dent Endod; 2021 May; 46(2):e25. PubMed ID: 34123761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study of dentinal tubule penetration and the retreatability of EndoSequence BC Sealer HiFlow, iRoot SP, and AH Plus with different obturation techniques. Yang R; Tian J; Huang X; Lei S; Cai Y; Xu Z; Wei X Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jun; 25(6):4163-4173. PubMed ID: 33638051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of Different Solvents for Achieving Patency in Teeth Obturated Using Bioceramic Sealer. Rezaei G; Liu X; Jalali P J Endod; 2023 Feb; 49(2):219-223. PubMed ID: 36526108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of porosity, sealer dissolution and apical extrusion of endodontic sealers: A micro computed tomography study. Jasrasaria N; Tikku AP; Bharti R J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2023; 13(4):495-499. PubMed ID: 37293581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of Reciprocating Instruments in the Removal of Bioceramic and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealers: Micro-CT Analysis. Rajda M; Miletić I; Baršić G; Krmek SJ; Šnjarić D; Baraba A Materials (Basel); 2021 Nov; 14(21):. PubMed ID: 34772195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the sealing ability of different root canal sealers: a combined SEM and micro-CT study. Huang Y; Orhan K; Celikten B; Orhan AI; Tufenkci P; Sevimay S J Appl Oral Sci; 2018 Jan; 26():e20160584. PubMed ID: 29340481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment instrumentation to remove single gutta-percha cones cemented with several endodontic sealers. Ersev H; Yilmaz B; Dinçol ME; Dağlaroğlu R Int Endod J; 2012 Aug; 45(8):756-62. PubMed ID: 22432937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A micro-computed tomographic study of remaining filling materials of two bioceramic sealers and epoxy resin sealer after retreatment. Kim K; Kim DV; Kim SY; Yang S Restor Dent Endod; 2019 May; 44(2):e18. PubMed ID: 31149616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the interface between gutta-percha and two types of sealers using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Eltair M; Pitchika V; Hickel R; Kühnisch J; Diegritz C Clin Oral Investig; 2018 May; 22(4):1631-1639. PubMed ID: 29080076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Obturation Quality between Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers and Resin-Based Sealers for Endodontic Re-treatment. Jin HR; Jang YE; Kim Y Materials (Basel); 2021 Dec; 15(1):. PubMed ID: 35009220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cytocompatibility of calcium silicate-based sealers in a three-dimensional cell culture model. da Silva EJNL; Zaia AA; Peters OA Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun; 21(5):1531-1536. PubMed ID: 27460565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparisons of the Retreatment Efficacy of Calcium Silicate and Epoxy Resin-based Sealers and Residual Sealer in Dentinal Tubules. Kim H; Kim E; Lee SJ; Shin SJ J Endod; 2015 Dec; 41(12):2025-30. PubMed ID: 26478438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intratubular penetration of endodontic sealers depends on the fluorophore used for CLSM assessment. Furtado TC; de Bem IA; Machado LS; Pereira JR; Só MVR; da Rosa RA Microsc Res Tech; 2021 Feb; 84(2):305-312. PubMed ID: 32914923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retreatability of three calcium silicate-containing sealers and one epoxy resin-based root canal sealer with four different root canal instruments. Donnermeyer D; Bunne C; Schäfer E; Dammaschke T Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):811-817. PubMed ID: 28643130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retreatability of root canals filled with Gutta percha and a novel bioceramic sealer: A scanning electron microscopy study. Kakoura F; Pantelidou O J Conserv Dent; 2018; 21(6):632-636. PubMed ID: 30546209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dentinal Tubule Penetrability and Bond Strength of Two Novel Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers. Shieh K; Yang J; Zhu EH; Peters OA; Hosseinpour S Materials (Basel); 2023 Apr; 16(9):. PubMed ID: 37176191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cytotoxicity evaluation of Gutta Flow and Endo Sequence BC sealers. Zoufan K; Jiang J; Komabayashi T; Wang YH; Safavi KE; Zhu Q Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Nov; 112(5):657-61. PubMed ID: 21778087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]