373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28194533)
1. The diagnostic accuracy of a laser fluorescence device and digital radiography in detecting approximal caries lesions in posterior permanent teeth: an in vivo study.
Menem R; Barngkgei I; Beiruti N; Al Haffar I; Joury E
Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 32(3):621-628. PubMed ID: 28194533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro performance of a pen-type laser fluorescence device and bitewing radiographs for approximal caries detection in permanent and primary teeth.
de Souza JF; Diniz MB; Boldieri T; Rodrigues JA; Lussi A; de Cássia Loiola Cordeiro R
Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(6):702-10. PubMed ID: 25728100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of a pen-type laser fluorescence device and conventional methods in detecting approximal caries lesions in primary teeth--in vivo study.
Novaes TF; Matos R; Braga MM; Imparato JC; Raggio DP; Mendes FM
Caries Res; 2009; 43(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 19136830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of Caries Around Amalgam Restorations on Approximal Surfaces.
Diniz MB; Cordeiro RC; Ferreira-Zandona AG
Oper Dent; 2016; 41(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 26237637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of pen-type laser fluorescence device and radiographic methods in detecting approximal carious lesions in primary teeth - an in vivo study.
de Souza LA; Cancio V; Tostes MA
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2018 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 29968339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro performance of methods of approximal caries detection in primary molars.
Braga MM; Morais CC; Nakama RC; Leamari VM; Siqueira WL; Mendes FM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Oct; 108(4):e35-41. PubMed ID: 19778733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of the discomfort reported by children on the performance of approximal caries detection methods.
Novaes TF; Matos R; Raggio DP; Imparato JC; Braga MM; Mendes FM
Caries Res; 2010; 44(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 20861630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro detection of secondary caries associated with composite restorations on approximal surfaces using laser fluorescence.
Rodrigues JA; Neuhaus KW; Hug I; Stich H; Seemann R; Lussi A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):564-71. PubMed ID: 20945748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical performance of clinical-visual examination, digital bitewing radiography, laser fluorescence, and near-infrared light transillumination for detection of non-cavitated proximal enamel and dentin caries.
Kocak N; Cengiz-Yanardag E
Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Sep; 35(7):1621-1628. PubMed ID: 32333336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of contact points on the performance of caries detection methods in approximal surfaces of primary molars: an in vivo study.
Ribeiro AA; Purger F; Rodrigues JA; Oliveira PR; Lussi A; Monteiro AH; Alves HD; Assis JT; Vasconcellos AB
Caries Res; 2015; 49(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 25572115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pen-type laser fluorescence device versus bitewing radiographs for caries detection on approximal surfaces.
Bizhang M; Wollenweber N; Singh-Hüsgen P; Danesh G; Zimmer S
Head Face Med; 2016 Nov; 12(1):30. PubMed ID: 27809872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The performance of conventional and fluorescence-based methods for occlusal caries detection: an in vivo study with histologic validation.
Diniz MB; Boldieri T; Rodrigues JA; Santos-Pinto L; Lussi A; Cordeiro RC
J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Apr; 143(4):339-50. PubMed ID: 22467694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of laser fluorescence devices, visual and radiographic examination for the detection of occlusal caries in primary molars.
Neuhaus KW; Rodrigues JA; Hug I; Stich H; Lussi A
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Oct; 15(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 20505963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro performance of near infrared light transillumination at 780-nm and digital radiography for detection of non-cavitated approximal caries.
Abogazalah N; Eckert GJ; Ando M
J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():44-50. PubMed ID: 28559050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of laser fluorescence devices for detection of caries in primary teeth.
Cınar C; Atabek D; Odabaş ME; Olmez A
Int Dent J; 2013 Apr; 63(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 23550523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Different Contact Materials on Approximal Caries Detection by Laser Fluorescence and Light-Emitting Diode Devices.
Ozsevik AS; Kararslan ES; Aktan AM; Bozdemir E; Cebe F; Sarı F
Photomed Laser Surg; 2015 Oct; 33(10):492-7. PubMed ID: 26352346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accurate Detection of Non-Cavitated Proximal Caries in Posterior Permanent Teeth: An in vivo Study.
Alammar R; Sadaf D
Risk Manag Healthc Policy; 2020; 13():1431-1436. PubMed ID: 32943960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical performance of two fluorescence-based methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
Matos R; Novaes TF; Braga MM; Siqueira WL; Duarte DA; Mendes FM
Caries Res; 2011; 45(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 21625126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A clinical study of a laser fluorescence device for the detection of approximal caries in primary molars.
Chen J; Qin M; Ma W; Ge L
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Mar; 22(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 21951216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The validity of laser fluorescence (LF) and near-infrared reflection (NIRR) in detecting early proximal cavities.
Ahrari F; Akbari M; Mohammadi M; Fallahrastegar A; Najafi MN
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Aug; 25(8):4817-4824. PubMed ID: 33751220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
