These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2819525)

  • 1. The relationship of child abuse indicators to the assessment of perceived risk and to the court's decision to separate.
    Dalgleish LI; Drew EC
    Child Abuse Negl; 1989; 13(4):491-506. PubMed ID: 2819525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The juvenile court and dependency cases.
    Barth RP
    Future Child; 1996; 6(3):100-10. PubMed ID: 9117356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Child sexual abuse: who goes home?
    Jaudes PK; Morris M
    Child Abuse Negl; 1990; 14(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 2310974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Responsibilities and effectiveness of the juvenile court in handling dependency cases.
    Hardin M
    Future Child; 1996; 6(3):111-25. PubMed ID: 9117357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Death without dignity for commercial surrogacy: the case of Baby M.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(2):21-4. PubMed ID: 3391765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Professionals' decision-making about out-of-home placements following instances of child abuse.
    Britner PA; Mossler DG
    Child Abuse Negl; 2002 Apr; 26(4):317-32. PubMed ID: 12092801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The U.S. Supreme Court on victimized children: the constitutional rights of the defendant versus the best interests of the child.
    Kermani EJ
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1991 Sep; 30(5):839-41. PubMed ID: 1938804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Participation of traumatized children and adolescents affected by provisional safeguards (removal and custody of children ace. to Para. 42 SGB VIII)_].
    Rücker S; Büttner P; Fegert J; Petermann F
    Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother; 2015 Sep; 43(5):357-64. PubMed ID: 26373387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of fairness in child custody decisions.
    Brems C; Carssow KL; Shook C; Sturgill S; Cannava P
    Child Abuse Negl; 1995 Mar; 19(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 9278734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Constitutional challenges to child witness protection legislation: an update.
    Small MA
    Violence Vict; 1994; 9(4):369-77. PubMed ID: 7577763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alleged child abuse in custody access disputes.
    Hlady LJ; Gunter EJ
    Child Abuse Negl; 1990; 14(4):591-3. PubMed ID: 2289189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Child custody decisions in families experiencing woman abuse.
    Saunders DG
    Soc Work; 1994 Jan; 39(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 8310323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Child custody disputes within the context of child protection investigations: secondary analysis of the Canadian Incident Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect.
    Saini MA; Black T; Fallon B; Marshall A
    Child Welfare; 2013; 92(1):115-37. PubMed ID: 23984488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceived social risk in medical decision-making for physical child abuse: a mixed-methods study.
    Keenan HT; Campbell KA; Page K; Cook LJ; Bardsley T; Olson LM
    BMC Pediatr; 2017 Dec; 17(1):214. PubMed ID: 29273019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parental kidnapping. Legal history, profiles of risk, and preventive interventions.
    Johnston JR; Sagatun-Edwards I
    Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2002 Oct; 11(4):805-22, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 12397900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. THE SAAF STUDY: evaluation of the Safeguarding Children Assessment and Analysis Framework (SAAF), compared with management as usual, for improving outcomes for children and young people who have experienced, or are at risk of, maltreatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Macdonald G; Lewis J; Macdonald K; Gardner E; Murphy L; Adams C; Ghate D; Cotmore R; Green J
    Trials; 2014 Nov; 15():453. PubMed ID: 25413974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A model for predicting court decisions on child custody.
    Muñoz Soro JF; Serrano-Cinca C
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258993. PubMed ID: 34673827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parental compliance to court-ordered treatment interventions in cases of child maltreatment.
    Famularo R; Kinscherff R; Bunshaft D; Spivak G; Fenton T
    Child Abuse Negl; 1989; 13(4):507-14. PubMed ID: 2819526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Child abuse and custody disputes: when should the caregiver report the case to police and social services, and when is there an obligation to do so?].
    Persson L
    Lakartidningen; 1990 Feb; 87(8):538, 543. PubMed ID: 2308415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Indian Family Exception Doctrine: still losing children despite the Indian Child Welfare Act.
    Cross SL
    Child Welfare; 2006; 85(4):671-90. PubMed ID: 17039824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.