These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28195664)
1. An adaptive model for rapid and direct estimation of extravascular extracellular space in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI studies. Dehkordi AN; Kamali-Asl A; Ewing JR; Wen N; Chetty IJ; Bagher-Ebadian H NMR Biomed; 2017 May; 30(5):. PubMed ID: 28195664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. GPU-accelerated nonparametric kinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data from glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab. Hsu YH; Ferl GZ; Ng CM Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 May; 31(4):618-23. PubMed ID: 23200680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation. Fedorov A; Fluckiger J; Ayers GD; Li X; Gupta SN; Tempany C; Mulkern R; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy FM Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 24560287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of DCE-MRI parameters for brain tumors through implementation of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model approaches for Gd-DOTA. Spanakis M; Kontopodis E; Van Cauter S; Sakkalis V; Marias K J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Oct; 43(5):529-47. PubMed ID: 27647272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of two-compartment-exchange-model analysis for dynamic contrast-enhanced mri incorporating bolus arrival time. Nadav G; Liberman G; Artzi M; Kiryati N; Bashat DB J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jan; 45(1):237-249. PubMed ID: 27383624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of tumors: preclinical validation of parametric images. Egeland TA; Simonsen TG; Gaustad JV; Gulliksrud K; Ellingsen C; Rofstad EK Radiat Res; 2009 Sep; 172(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 19708783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Artificial Neural Networks approach to pharmacokinetic model selection in DCE-MRI studies. Mohammadian-Behbahani MR; Kamali-Asl AR Phys Med; 2016 Dec; 32(12):1543-1550. PubMed ID: 27876537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of analytical and numerical analysis of the reference region model for DCE-MRI. Lee J; Cárdenas-Rodríguez J; Pagel MD; Platt S; Kent M; Zhao Q Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 32(7):845-53. PubMed ID: 24925838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The application of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with maxillofacial tumors. Kitamoto E; Chikui T; Kawano S; Ohga M; Kobayashi K; Matsuo Y; Yoshiura T; Obara M; Honda H; Yoshiura K Acad Radiol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 25442795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Subcompartmentalization of extracellular extravascular space (EES) into permeability and leaky space with local arterial input function (AIF) results in improved discrimination between high- and low-grade glioma using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. Sahoo P; Rathore RK; Awasthi R; Roy B; Verma S; Rathore D; Behari S; Husain M; Husain N; Pandey CM; Mohakud S; Gupta RK J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 38(3):677-88. PubMed ID: 23390002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of individual and population-derived vascular input functions for quantitative DCE-MRI in rats. Hormuth DA; Skinner JT; Does MD; Yankeelov TE Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 24556502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance dispersion imaging for localization of angiogenesis and cancer growth. Mischi M; Turco S; Lavini C; Kompatsiari K; de la Rosette JJ; Breeuwer M; Wijkstra H Invest Radiol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):561-9. PubMed ID: 24691142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of liver fibrosis using pharmacokinetic parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Li Z; Sun J; Chen L; Huang N; Hu P; Hu X; Han G; Zhou Y; Bai W; Niu T; Yang X J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 44(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 26707910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Study of inter-software accuracy and reproducibility using simulated and clinical data. Beuzit L; Eliat PA; Brun V; Ferré JC; Gandon Y; Bannier E; Saint-Jalmes H J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1288-300. PubMed ID: 26687041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Blind estimation of the arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using purity maximization. Lin YC; Chan TH; Chi CY; Ng SH; Liu HL; Wei KC; Wai YY; Wang CC; Wang JJ Magn Reson Med; 2012 Nov; 68(5):1439-49. PubMed ID: 22383386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An automated method for nonparametric kinetic analysis of clinical DCE-MRI data: application to glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. Ferl GZ; Xu L; Friesenhahn M; Bernstein LJ; Barboriak DP; Port RE Magn Reson Med; 2010 May; 63(5):1366-75. PubMed ID: 20432307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of pancreatic cancer by multiple breath-hold dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T. Yao X; Zeng M; Wang H; Sun F; Rao S; Ji Y Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):e917-22. PubMed ID: 22695786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study. Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Model selection for DCE-T1 studies in glioblastoma. Bagher-Ebadian H; Jain R; Nejad-Davarani SP; Mikkelsen T; Lu M; Jiang Q; Scarpace L; Arbab AS; Narang J; Soltanian-Zadeh H; Paudyal R; Ewing JR Magn Reson Med; 2012 Jul; 68(1):241-51. PubMed ID: 22127934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]