These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28195713)

  • 1. Ward Clustering Improves Cross-Validated Markov State Models of Protein Folding.
    Husic BE; Pande VS
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Mar; 13(3):963-967. PubMed ID: 28195713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Minimum Variance Clustering Approach Produces Robust and Interpretable Coarse-Grained Models.
    Husic BE; McKiernan KA; Wayment-Steele HK; Sultan MM; Pande VS
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Feb; 14(2):1071-1082. PubMed ID: 29253336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Clustering Algorithm on Establishing Markov State Model for Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Li Y; Dong Z
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1205-15. PubMed ID: 27249546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Constructing multi-resolution Markov State Models (MSMs) to elucidate RNA hairpin folding mechanisms.
    Huang X; Yao Y; Bowman GR; Sun J; Guibas LJ; Carlsson G; Pande VS
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2010; ():228-39. PubMed ID: 19908375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Markov State Models: From an Art to a Science.
    Husic BE; Pande VS
    J Am Chem Soc; 2018 Feb; 140(7):2386-2396. PubMed ID: 29323881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic state partitioning for multibody systems (APM): an efficient algorithm for constructing Markov state models to elucidate conformational dynamics of multibody systems.
    Sheong FK; Silva DA; Meng L; Zhao Y; Huang X
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jan; 11(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 26574199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of Markov State Models to simulate long timescale dynamics of biological macromolecules.
    Da LT; Sheong FK; Silva DA; Huang X
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2014; 805():29-66. PubMed ID: 24446356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Markov state models provide insights into dynamic modulation of protein function.
    Shukla D; Hernández CX; Weber JK; Pande VS
    Acc Chem Res; 2015 Feb; 48(2):414-22. PubMed ID: 25625937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimized parameter selection reveals trends in Markov state models for protein folding.
    Husic BE; McGibbon RT; Sultan MM; Pande VS
    J Chem Phys; 2016 Nov; 145(19):194103. PubMed ID: 27875868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diffusion maps, clustering and fuzzy Markov modeling in peptide folding transitions.
    Nedialkova LV; Amat MA; Kevrekidis IG; Hummer G
    J Chem Phys; 2014 Sep; 141(11):114102. PubMed ID: 25240340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Markov state models from hierarchical density-based assignment.
    Mitxelena I; López X; de Sancho D
    J Chem Phys; 2021 Aug; 155(5):054102. PubMed ID: 34364321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robust Density-Based Clustering To Identify Metastable Conformational States of Proteins.
    Sittel F; Stock G
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 May; 12(5):2426-35. PubMed ID: 27058020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using Markov state models to study self-assembly.
    Perkett MR; Hagan MF
    J Chem Phys; 2014 Jun; 140(21):214101. PubMed ID: 24907984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating the Bioactive Conformation of Angiotensin II Using Markov State Modeling Revisited with Web-Scale Clustering.
    Christoforou E; Leontiadou H; Noé F; Samios J; Emiris IZ; Cournia Z
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Sep; 18(9):5636-5648. PubMed ID: 35944098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What Markov State Models Can and Cannot Do: Correlation versus Path-Based Observables in Protein-Folding Models.
    Suárez E; Wiewiora RP; Wehmeyer C; Noé F; Chodera JD; Zuckerman DM
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 May; 17(5):3119-3133. PubMed ID: 33904312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Markov state models of protein misfolding.
    Sirur A; De Sancho D; Best RB
    J Chem Phys; 2016 Feb; 144(7):075101. PubMed ID: 26897000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hierarchical Nyström methods for constructing Markov state models for conformational dynamics.
    Yao Y; Cui RZ; Bowman GR; Silva DA; Sun J; Huang X
    J Chem Phys; 2013 May; 138(17):174106. PubMed ID: 23656113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using path sampling to build better Markovian state models: predicting the folding rate and mechanism of a tryptophan zipper beta hairpin.
    Singhal N; Snow CD; Pande VS
    J Chem Phys; 2004 Jul; 121(1):415-25. PubMed ID: 15260562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why are MD simulated protein folding times wrong?
    Nerukhdn D
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2010; 680():321-6. PubMed ID: 20865515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulating the peptide folding kinetic related spectra based on the Markov State Model.
    Song J; Zhuang W
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2014; 805():199-220. PubMed ID: 24446363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.