699 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28196116)
1. The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing.
Luo Q; Zhao L; Hu J; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171433. PubMed ID: 28196116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Performance of Several Docking Programs at Reproducing Protein-Macrolide-Like Crystal Structures.
Castro-Alvarez A; Costa AM; Vilarrasa J
Molecules; 2017 Jan; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 28106755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. FlexAID: Revisiting Docking on Non-Native-Complex Structures.
Gaudreault F; Najmanovich RJ
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1323-36. PubMed ID: 26076070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. GalaxyDock BP2 score: a hybrid scoring function for accurate protein-ligand docking.
Baek M; Shin WH; Chung HW; Seok C
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jul; 31(7):653-666. PubMed ID: 28623486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing sixteen scoring functions for predicting biological activities of ligands for protein targets.
Xu W; Lucke AJ; Fairlie DP
J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Apr; 57():76-88. PubMed ID: 25682361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of reverse docking for target prediction of marine compounds with anti-tumor activity.
Chen F; Wang Z; Wang C; Xu Q; Liang J; Xu X; Yang J; Wang C; Jiang T; Yu R
J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Oct; 77():372-377. PubMed ID: 28950183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PSOVina: The hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for protein-ligand docking.
Ng MC; Fong S; Siu SW
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2015 Jun; 13(3):1541007. PubMed ID: 25800162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Protein-specific scoring method for ligand discovery.
Lu IL; Wang H
J Comput Biol; 2012 Nov; 19(11):1215-26. PubMed ID: 23075003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structure-based computational approaches for small-molecule modulation of protein-protein interactions.
Xu D; Wang B; Meroueh SO
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1278():77-92. PubMed ID: 25859944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility.
Ravindranath PA; Forli S; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ; Sanner MF
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Dec; 11(12):e1004586. PubMed ID: 26629955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PLHINT: A knowledge-driven computational approach based on the intermolecular H bond interactions at the protein-ligand interface from docking solutions.
Kumar SP
J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Jan; 79():194-212. PubMed ID: 29241118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of MDockPP in CAPRI rounds 28-29 and 31-35 including the prediction of water-mediated interactions.
Xu X; Qiu L; Yan C; Ma Z; Grinter SZ; Zou X
Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):424-434. PubMed ID: 27802576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Normalizing molecular docking rankings using virtually generated decoys.
Wallach I; Jaitly N; Nguyen K; Schapira M; Lilien R
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Aug; 51(8):1817-30. PubMed ID: 21699246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An accurate metalloprotein-specific scoring function and molecular docking program devised by a dynamic sampling and iteration optimization strategy.
Bai F; Liao S; Gu J; Jiang H; Wang X; Li H
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Apr; 55(4):833-47. PubMed ID: 25746437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.
Cleves AE; Jain AN
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Jun; 29(6):485-509. PubMed ID: 25940276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Machine learning in computational docking.
Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing Molecular Docking Tools to Guide Targeted Drug Discovery of CD38 Inhibitors.
Boittier ED; Tang YY; Buckley ME; Schuurs ZP; Richard DJ; Gandhi NS
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Jul; 21(15):. PubMed ID: 32707824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is It Reliable to Use Common Molecular Docking Methods for Comparing the Binding Affinities of Enantiomer Pairs for Their Protein Target?
RamÃrez D; Caballero J
Int J Mol Sci; 2016 Apr; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 27104528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
