151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28196288)
1. Clinical adequacy assessment of autocontours for prostate IMRT with meaningful endpoints.
Nourzadeh H; Watkins WT; Ahmed M; Hui C; Schlesinger D; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1525-1537. PubMed ID: 28196288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Target miss using PTV-based IMRT compared to robust optimization via coverage probability concept in prostate cancer.
Outaggarts Z; Wegener D; Berger B; Zips D; Paulsen F; Bleif M; Thorwarth D; Alber M; Dohm O; Müller AC
Acta Oncol; 2020 Aug; 59(8):911-917. PubMed ID: 32436467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating random patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.
Moore JA; Gordon JJ; Anscher MS; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3880-90. PubMed ID: 19810460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a commercial DIR platform for contour propagation in prostate cancer patients treated with IMRT/VMAT.
Hammers JE; Pirozzi S; Lindsay D; Kaidar-Person O; Tan X; Chen RC; Das SK; Mavroidis P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):14-25. PubMed ID: 32058663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic segmentation for adaptive planning in nasopharyngeal carcinoma IMRT: Time, geometrical, and dosimetric analysis.
Fung NTC; Hung WM; Sze CK; Lee MCH; Ng WT
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 31345672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coverage-based treatment planning to accommodate delineation uncertainties in prostate cancer treatment.
Xu H; Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5435-43. PubMed ID: 26328992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without intensity modulated beams: a planning comparison.
De Meerleer GO; Vakaet LA; De Gersem WR; De Wagter C; De Naeyer B; De Neve W
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jun; 47(3):639-48. PubMed ID: 10837946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inverse and forward optimization of one- and two-dimensional intensity-modulated radiation therapy-based treatment of concave-shaped planning target volumes: the case of prostate cancer.
Corletto D; Iori M; Paiusco M; Brait L; Broggi S; Ceresoli G; Iotti C; Calandrino R; Fiorino C
Radiother Oncol; 2003 Feb; 66(2):185-95. PubMed ID: 12648791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of dosimetric margins in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 18383678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric Evaluation of Incorporating Patient Geometric Variations Into Adaptive Plan Optimization Through Probabilistic Treatment Planning in Head and Neck Cancers.
Liu Q; Liang J; Zhou D; Krauss DJ; Chen PY; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Jul; 101(4):985-997. PubMed ID: 29976511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of optimal PTV margin for patients receiving CBCT-guided prostate IMRT: comparative analysis based on CBCT dose calculation with four different margins.
Gill SK; Reddy K; Campbell N; Chen C; Pearson D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):252–262. PubMed ID: 26699581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conformal irradiation of concave-shaped PTVs in the treatment of prostate cancer by simple 1D intensity-modulated beams.
Fiorino C; Broggi S; Corletto D; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2000 Apr; 55(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 10788688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Coverage-based treatment planning to accommodate deformable organ variations in prostate cancer treatment.
Xu H; Vile DJ; Sharma M; Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101705. PubMed ID: 25281944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric and radiobiological consequences of computed tomography-guided adaptive strategies for intensity modulated radiation therapy of the prostate.
Battista JJ; Johnson C; Turnbull D; Kempe J; Bzdusek K; Van Dyk J; Bauman G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):874-80. PubMed ID: 23978708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric effects of the prone and supine positions on image guided localized prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Liu B; Lerma FA; Patel S; Amin P; Feng Y; Yi BY; Yu C
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 18207595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment and management of interfractional variations in daily diagnostic-quality-CT guided prostate-bed irradiation after prostatectomy.
Liu F; Ahunbay E; Lawton C; Li XA
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031710. PubMed ID: 24593714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A treatment planning study comparing IMRT techniques and cyber knife for stereotactic body radiotherapy of low-risk prostate carcinoma.
Scobioala S; Kittel C; Elsayad K; Kroeger K; Oertel M; Samhouri L; Haverkamp U; Eich HT
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 14(1):143. PubMed ID: 31399115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Online image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: How much improvement can we expect? A theoretical assessment of clinical benefits and potential dose escalation by improving precision and accuracy of radiation delivery.
Ghilezan M; Yan D; Liang J; Jaffray D; Wong J; Martinez A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1602-10. PubMed ID: 15590192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric comparison of MR-linac-based IMRT and conventional VMAT treatment plans for prostate cancer.
Da Silva Mendes V; Nierer L; Li M; Corradini S; Reiner M; Kamp F; Niyazi M; Kurz C; Landry G; Belka C
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jul; 16(1):133. PubMed ID: 34289868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
