These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28196474)

  • 1. Biodegradable magnesium Herbert screw - image quality and artifacts with radiography, CT and MRI.
    Sonnow L; Könneker S; Vogt PM; Wacker F; von Falck C
    BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 17(1):16. PubMed ID: 28196474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Metallic artifacts from internal scaphoid fracture fixation screws: comparison between C-arm flat-panel, cone-beam, and multidetector computed tomography.
    Finkenstaedt T; Morsbach F; Calcagni M; Vich M; Pfirrmann CW; Alkadhi H; Runge VM; Andreisek G; Guggenberger R
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):532-9. PubMed ID: 24691141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metal-induced artifacts in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of a biodegradable magnesium alloy versus titanium and stainless steel controls.
    Filli L; Luechinger R; Frauenfelder T; Beck S; Guggenberger R; Farshad-Amacker N; Andreisek G
    Skeletal Radiol; 2015 Jun; 44(6):849-56. PubMed ID: 25417003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of SCAphoid fracture osteosynthesis by MAGnesium-based headless Herbert screws with titanium Herbert screws: protocol for the randomized controlled SCAMAG clinical trial.
    Könneker S; Krockenberger K; Pieh C; von Falck C; Brandewiede B; Vogt PM; Kirschner MH; Ziegler A
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Aug; 20(1):357. PubMed ID: 31387574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE sequence strategies for metal artifact reduction in 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ai T; Padua A; Goerner F; Nittka M; Gugala Z; Jadhav S; Trelles M; Johnson RF; Lindsey RW; Li X; Runge VM
    Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 22266987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of MR issues for the latest standard brands of orthopedic metal implants: plates and screws.
    Zou YF; Chu B; Wang CB; Hu ZY
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 84(3):450-457. PubMed ID: 25544555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bioabsorbable magnesium versus standard titanium compression screws for fixation of distal metatarsal osteotomies - 3 year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Plaass C; von Falck C; Ettinger S; Sonnow L; Calderone F; Weizbauer A; Reifenrath J; Claassen L; Waizy H; Daniilidis K; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Windhagen H
    J Orthop Sci; 2018 Mar; 23(2):321-327. PubMed ID: 29174422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK versus titanium implants: an in vitro comparison of susceptibility artifacts in CT and MR imaging.
    Krätzig T; Mende KC; Mohme M; Kniep H; Dreimann M; Stangenberg M; Westphal M; Gauer T; Eicker SO
    Neurosurg Rev; 2021 Aug; 44(4):2163-2170. PubMed ID: 32930911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance imaging in cadaver dogs with metallic vertebral implants at 3 Tesla: evaluation of the WARP-turbo spin echo sequence.
    Griffin JF; Archambault NS; Mankin JM; Wall CR; Thompson JA; Padua A; Purdy D; Kerwin SC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(24):E1548-53. PubMed ID: 23921320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the image quality of a mobile flat-panel computed tomography and a multidetector computed tomography: a phantom study.
    Neubauer J; Voigt JM; Lang H; Scheuer C; Goerke SM; Langer M; Fiebich M; Kotter E
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):491-7. PubMed ID: 24637586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dose perturbation effect of metallic spinal implants in proton beam therapy.
    Jia Y; Zhao L; Cheng CW; McDonald MW; Das IJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):333-343. PubMed ID: 26699317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of metal artifact reduction techniques in magnetic resonance imaging of carbon-reinforced PEEK and titanium spinal implants.
    Osterhoff G; Huber FA; Graf LC; Erdlen F; Pape HC; Sprengel K; Guggenberger R
    Acta Radiol; 2022 Aug; 63(8):1062-1070. PubMed ID: 34229463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flat-panel CT arthrography: feasibility study and comparison to multidetector CT arthrography.
    Guggenberger R; Fischer MA; Hodler J; Pfammatter T; Andreisek G
    Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):312-8. PubMed ID: 22488509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metal artifact reduction in CT, a phantom study: subjective and objective evaluation of four commercial metal artifact reduction algorithms when used on three different orthopedic metal implants.
    Bolstad K; Flatabø S; Aadnevik D; Dalehaug I; Vetti N
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1110-1118. PubMed ID: 29310445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic resonance imaging susceptibility artifacts in the cervical vertebrae and spinal cord related to monocortical screw-polymethylmethacrylate implants in canine cadavers.
    Jones BG; Fosgate GT; Green EM; Habing AM; Hettlich BF
    Am J Vet Res; 2017 Apr; 78(4):458-464. PubMed ID: 28346006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Metal artifact reduction in post-operative spinal imaging using image acquisition protocol in multidetector computed tomography scans. Cohort study].
    Romero Muñoz LM; Alfonso Olmos M; Villas Tomé C
    An Sist Sanit Navar; 2015; 38(3):417-24. PubMed ID: 26786369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of magnetic resonance and computed tomographic image quality after the implantation of tantalum and titanium spinal instrumentation.
    Wang JC; Yu WD; Sandhu HS; Tam V; Delamarter RB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Aug; 23(15):1684-8. PubMed ID: 9704376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vivo degradation of a new concept of magnesium-based rivet-screws in the minipig mandibular bone.
    Schaller B; Saulacic N; Beck S; Imwinkelried T; Goh BT; Nakahara K; Hofstetter W; Iizuka T
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Dec; 69():247-54. PubMed ID: 27612710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metal artifact reduction by the alteration of technical factors in multidetector computed tomography: a 3-dimensional quantitative assessment.
    Moon SG; Hong SH; Choi JY; Jun WS; Kang HG; Kim HS; Kang HS
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(4):630-3. PubMed ID: 18664853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance imaging in zirconia-based dental implantology.
    Duttenhoefer F; Mertens ME; Vizkelety J; Gremse F; Stadelmann VA; Sauerbier S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Oct; 26(10):1195-202. PubMed ID: 24893967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.