201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28196898)
1. Increased Radial Access Is Not Associated With Worse Femoral Outcomes for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United Kingdom.
Hulme W; Sperrin M; Kontopantelis E; Ratib K; Ludman P; Sirker A; Kinnaird T; Curzen N; Kwok CS; De Belder M; Nolan J; Mamas MA;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Feb; 10(2):e004279. PubMed ID: 28196898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?
Mamas MA; Ratib K; Routledge H; Neyses L; Fraser DG; de Belder M; Ludman PF; Nolan J;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):698-706. PubMed ID: 23769648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Access Site Practice on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Thrombolysis for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United Kingdom: An Insight From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Dataset.
Rashid M; Rushton CA; Kwok CS; Kinnaird T; Kontopantelis E; Olier I; Ludman P; De Belder MA; Nolan J; Mamas MA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 10(22):2258-2265. PubMed ID: 29169494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vascular Access Site and Outcomes in 58,870 Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With a Previous History of Coronary Bypass Surgery: Results From the British Cardiovascular Interventions Society National Database.
Kinnaird T; Anderson R; Gallagher S; Cockburn J; Sirker A; Ludman P; de Belder M; Copt S; Nolan J; Zaman A; Mamas M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 11(5):482-492. PubMed ID: 29519382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Access Site and Outcomes for Unprotected Left Main Stem Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Analysis of the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Database.
Kinnaird T; Anderson R; Gallagher S; Sirker A; Ludman P; de Belder M; Copt S; Oldroyd K; Curzen N; Banning A; Mamas M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 11(24):2480-2491. PubMed ID: 30573059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Barriers to use of radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention.
Riangwiwat T; Mumtaz T; Blankenship JC
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Aug; 96(2):268-273. PubMed ID: 31797564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Access site practice and procedural outcomes in relation to clinical presentation in 439,947 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United kingdom.
Ratib K; Mamas MA; Anderson SG; Bhatia G; Routledge H; De Belder M; Ludman PF; Fraser D; Nolan J;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt A):20-9. PubMed ID: 25616814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transradial vs. Transfemoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With or Without High Bleeding Risk Criteria.
Yamamoto K; Natsuaki M; Morimoto T; Shiomi H; Watanabe H; Yamaji K; Watanabe H; Kato T; Saito N; Ando K; Kadota K; Furukawa Y; Kimura T;
Circ J; 2020 Apr; 84(5):723-732. PubMed ID: 32188831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incidence, Determinants, and Outcomes of Left and Right Radial Access Use in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United Kingdom: A National Perspective Using the BCIS Dataset.
Rashid M; Lawson C; Potts J; Kontopantelis E; Kwok CS; Bertrand OF; Shoaib A; Ludman P; Kinnaird T; de Belder M; Nolan J; Mamas MA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 11(11):1021-1033. PubMed ID: 29778726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Primary and Secondary Vascular Access Site Complications Associated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the BMC2 Registry.
Kopin D; Seth M; Sukul D; Dixon S; Aronow HD; Lee D; Tucciarone M; Pielsticker E; Gurm HS
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Nov; 12(22):2247-2256. PubMed ID: 31473240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Interventions Across the Entire Spectrum of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
Ferrante G; Rao SV; Jüni P; Da Costa BR; Reimers B; Condorelli G; Anzuini A; Jolly SS; Bertrand OF; Krucoff MW; Windecker S; Valgimigli M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 9(14):1419-34. PubMed ID: 27372195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Costs of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention.
Amin AP; House JA; Safley DM; Chhatriwalla AK; Giersiefen H; Bremer A; Hamon M; Baklanov DV; Aluko A; Wohns D; Mathias DW; Applegate RA; Cohen DJ; Marso SP
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):827-34. PubMed ID: 23871512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: A radial-first centre experience and meta-analysis of published studies.
Roule V; Lemaitre A; Sabatier R; Lognoné T; Dahdouh Z; Berger L; Milliez P; Grollier G; Montalescot G; Beygui F
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2015 Nov; 108(11):563-75. PubMed ID: 26365478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vascular Access Site and Outcomes Among 26,807 Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion Angioplasty Cases From the British Cardiovascular Interventions Society National Database.
Kinnaird T; Anderson R; Ossei-Gerning N; Gallagher S; Large A; Strange J; Ludman P; de Belder M; Nolan J; Hildick-Smith D; Mamas M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Apr; 10(7):635-644. PubMed ID: 28385401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Rotational Atherectomy: A UK Observational Study of 8622 Patients.
Watt J; Austin D; Mackay D; Nolan J; Oldroyd KG
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 29246910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adoption of the transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention and rates of vascular complications following transfemoral procedures: Insights from NCDR.
Badri M; Shapiro T; Wang Y; Minges KE; Curtis JP; Gray WA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Nov; 92(5):835-841. PubMed ID: 29359497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Impact of Bleeding Avoidance Strategies on Hospital-Level Variation in Bleeding Rates Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry.
Vora AN; Peterson ED; McCoy LA; Garratt KN; Kutcher MA; Marso SP; Roe MT; Messenger JC; Rao SV
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 9(8):771-779. PubMed ID: 27101904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of age on access site-related outcomes in 469,983 percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: Insights from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.
Anderson SG; Ratib K; Myint PK; Keavney B; Kwok CS; Zaman A; Ludman PF; de Belder MA; Nolan J; Mamas MA; ;
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(6):965-72. PubMed ID: 25676689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Left main percutaneous coronary intervention-Radial versus femoral access: A systematic analysis.
Goel S; Pasam RT; Raheja H; Gotesman J; Gidwani U; Ahuja KR; Reed G; Puri R; Khatri JK; Kapadia SR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 95(7):E201-E213. PubMed ID: 31430040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes of Transradial PCI compared to Transfemoral PCI in veterans with anemia: Insight from the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting and Tracking (CART) program.
Bagai J; Hess E; Penny WF; Plomondon ME; Waldo SW
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Nov; 20(11):990-996. PubMed ID: 30679117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
