These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2819690)

  • 1. Quality assurance in mammography.
    Dodd GD
    Cancer; 1989 Dec; 64(12 Suppl):2707-9. PubMed ID: 2819690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammography processor quality assurance.
    Monda LA
    Radiol Technol; 2002; 74(1):46-68; quiz 69-72. PubMed ID: 12362534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A program devoted to dose and quality in mammography (DQM)].
    Rimondi O; Gambaccini M; Indovina P; Candini G
    Radiol Med; 1986 Mar; 72(3):116-20. PubMed ID: 3704212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Guideline for the additional test positions according to the EPQC 4th Edition for Digital Mammography Systems].
    Sommer A; Lenzen H; Blaser D; Ehlers SE; Schopphoven S; John C;
    Rofo; 2009 Sep; 181(9):845-50. PubMed ID: 19676011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implementing digital quality control in a breast center.
    Parikh J; Fanus D
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Nov; 1(11):854-60. PubMed ID: 17411717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Mammography 1994, Part I].
    Friedrich M
    Rofo; 1994 Feb; 160(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 8312504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of results from quality control of physical parameters and results from clinical evaluation of mammographic images for the mammography screening facilities in Poland.
    Fabiszewska E; Grabska I; Jankowska K; Wesolowska E; Bulski W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):206-9. PubMed ID: 21824870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Requirements for quality breast cancer detection. Technical quality control.
    Hendrick RE
    Cancer; 1989 Dec; 64(12 Suppl):2710-7. PubMed ID: 2819691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of quality assurance regulatory enforcement on performance of mammography systems: evidence from large-scale surveys in Taiwan.
    Hwang YS; Tsai HY; Chen CC; Tsay PK; Pan HB; Hsu GC; Lin JH; Chui CS; Wan YL; Liu HL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W307-12. PubMed ID: 23883245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality assurance in mammography. Accreditation, legislation, and compliance with quality assurance standards.
    Hendrick RE
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):243-55. PubMed ID: 1732931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Quality assurance in organized screening of breast cancer].
    De Landtsheer JP; Delaloye JF; Lepori D; De Grandi P; Levi F
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 2003 May; 123(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 15095710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality assurance. How to audit your own mammography practice.
    Sickles EA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):265-75. PubMed ID: 1732933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audits measure practice quality of mammography.
    Linver MN
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 2000 Jul; 22(7):57-61, 79. PubMed ID: 11010308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MQSA: the final rule.
    Linver M; Newman J
    Radiol Technol; 1999; 70(4):338-53; quiz 354-6. PubMed ID: 10101751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality assurance and ergonomics in the mammography department.
    Reynolds A
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 86(1):61M-79M; quiz 80M-83M. PubMed ID: 25224096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The challenge of assessing reader performance in mammography.
    Brennan PC; Soh BP
    Clin Radiol; 2012 Feb; 67(2):192. PubMed ID: 22118712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imaging capabilities and dose considerations of different mammographic units.
    Galkin BM; Feig SA; Frasca P; Muir HD; Soriano RZ
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1987; 105():25-30. PubMed ID: 3589131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of equipment performance, patient dose, imaging quality, and diagnostic coincidence in five Mexico City mammography services.
    Brandan ME; Ruiz-Trejo C; Verdejo-Silva M; Guevara M; Lozano-Zalce H; Madero-Preciado L; Martín J; Noel-Etienne LM; Ramírez-Arias JL; Soto J; Villaseñor Y
    Arch Med Res; 2004; 35(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 15036796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developing measures of mammography performance.
    Urban N
    Med Care; 2002 Jun; 40(6 Suppl):III86-8. PubMed ID: 12064762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality assurance for screening mammography: an international comparison.
    Klabunde C; Bouchard F; Taplin S; Scharpantgen A; Ballard-Barbash R;
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2001 Mar; 55(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 11160176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.