186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28197206)
1. Survival after Abdominoperineal and Sphincter-Preserving Resection in Nonmetastatic Rectal Cancer: A Population-Based Time-Trend and Propensity Score-Matched SEER Analysis.
Warschkow R; Ebinger SM; Brunner W; Schmied BM; Marti L
Gastroenterol Res Pract; 2017; 2017():6058907. PubMed ID: 28197206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Oncologic outcomes for low rectal adenocarcinoma following low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis versus abdominoperineal resection: a National Cancer Database propensity matched analysis.
Fields AC; Scully RE; Saadat LV; Lu P; Davids JS; Bleday R; Goldberg JE; Melnitchouk N
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2019 May; 34(5):843-848. PubMed ID: 30790033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sphincter-saving surgery versus abdominoperineal resection in low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant treatment with propensity score analysis.
Shin JK; Kim HC; Lee WY; Yun SH; Cho YB; Huh JW; Park YA
Surg Endosc; 2022 Apr; 36(4):2623-2630. PubMed ID: 34008108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of life meta-analysis following coloanal anastomosis versus abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer.
Maguire B; Clancy C; Connelly TM; Mehigan BJ; McCormick P; Altomare DF; Gosselink MP; Larkin JO
Colorectal Dis; 2022 Jul; 24(7):811-820. PubMed ID: 35194919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative survival risks in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection and sphincter-saving operation for rectal cancer: a 10-year cohort analysis using propensity score matching.
Lee HG; Kim CW; Lee JL; Yoon YS; Park IJ; Lim SB; Yu CS; Kim JC
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 May; 37(5):989-997. PubMed ID: 35378615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of functional and oncological outcome of conformal sphincter preservation operation, low anterior resection, and abdominoperineal resection in very low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparative cohort study with propensity score matching.
Sun G; Lou Z; Zheng K; Chen Y; Zhang H; Wen R; Gao X; Meng R; Gong H; Bai C; Furnée EJB; Zhang W
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 May; 408(1):208. PubMed ID: 37222797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Local control of sphincter-preserving procedures and abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced low rectal cancer: Propensity score matched analysis.
Okamura R; Hida K; Yamaguchi T; Akagi T; Konishi T; Yamamoto M; Ota M; Matoba S; Bando H; Goto S; Sakai Y; Watanabe M; ; Watanabe K; Otsuka K; Takemasa I; Tanaka K; Ikeda M; Matsuda C; Fukuda M; Hasegawa J; Akamoto S; Shiozawa M; Tsuruta A; Akiyoshi T; Kato T; Tsukamoto S; Ito M; Naito M; Kanazawa A; Takahashi T; Ueki T; Hayashi Y; Morita S; Yamaguchi T; Nakanishi M; Hasegawa H; Okamoto K; Teraishi F; Sumi Y; Tashiro J; Yatsuoka T; Nishimura Y; Okita K; Kobatake T; Horie H; Miyakura Y; Ro H; Nagakari K; Hidaka E; Umemoto T; Nishigori H; Murata K; Wakayama F; Makizumi R; Fujii S; Sunami E; Kobayashi H; Nakagawa R; Enomoto T; Ohnuma S; Higashijima J; Ozawa H; Ashida K; Fujita F; Uehara K; Maruyama S; Ohyama M; Yamamoto S; Hinoi T; Yoshimitsu M; Okajima M; Tanimura S; Kawasaki M; Ide Y; Hazama S; Watanabe J; Inagaki D; Toyokawa A
Ann Gastroenterol Surg; 2017 Sep; 1(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 29863157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of life after coloanal anastomosis and abdominoperineal resection for distal rectal cancers: sphincter preservation vs quality of life.
Kasparek MS; Hassan I; Cima RR; Larson DR; Gullerud RE; Wolff BG
Colorectal Dis; 2011 Aug; 13(8):872-7. PubMed ID: 20545966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anastomotic leakage is associated with impaired overall and disease-free survival after curative rectal cancer resection: a propensity score analysis.
Kulu Y; Tarantio I; Warschkow R; Kny S; Schneider M; Schmied BM; Büchler MW; Ulrich A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015; 22(6):2059-67. PubMed ID: 25348782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of oncological outcomes between low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study using a multicenter database in Japan.
Nagano H; Kajitani R; Ohno R; Munechika T; Matsumoto Y; Takahashi H; Aisu N; Kojima D; Yoshimatsu G; Hasegawa S; Kobayashi H; Sugihara K
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Dec; 48(12):2467-2474. PubMed ID: 35752499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coloanal anastomosis or abdominoperineal resection for very low rectal cancer: what will benefit, the surgeon's pride or the patient's quality of life?
Digennaro R; Tondo M; Cuccia F; Giannini I; Pezzolla F; Rinaldi M; Scala D; Romano G; Altomare DF
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jul; 28(7):949-57. PubMed ID: 23274737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer is facilitated by preoperative chemoradiation and intersphincteric dissection.
Weiser MR; Quah HM; Shia J; Guillem JG; Paty PB; Temple LK; Goodman KA; Minsky BD; Wong WD
Ann Surg; 2009 Feb; 249(2):236-42. PubMed ID: 19212176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends of sphincter-preserving surgeries for low lying rectal cancer: A 20-year experience in China.
Zheng K; Hu Q; Yu G; Zhou L; Yao Y; Zhou Y; Wang H; Hao L; Yu E; Lou Z; Zhang Y; Qiu H; Meng R; Zhang W
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():996866. PubMed ID: 36568186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Secondary malignancies after rectal cancer resection with and without radiation therapy: A propensity-adjusted, population-based SEER analysis.
Warschkow R; Güller U; Cerny T; Schmied BM; Plasswilm L; Putora PM
Radiother Oncol; 2017 Apr; 123(1):139-146. PubMed ID: 28285840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perioperative blood transfusions do not impact overall and disease-free survival after curative rectal cancer resection: a propensity score analysis.
Warschkow R; Güller U; Köberle D; Müller SA; Steffen T; Thurnheer M; Schmied BM; Tarantino I
Ann Surg; 2014 Jan; 259(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 23470578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors Associated With Oncologic Outcomes Following Abdominoperineal or Intersphincteric Resection in Patients Treated With Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score Analysis.
Kim CH; Lee SY; Kim HR; Kim YJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Nov; 94(45):e2060. PubMed ID: 26559314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of three-year oncological results after restorative low anterior resection, non-restorative low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.
Hol JC; Burghgraef TA; Rutgers MLW; Crolla RMPH; van Geloven NAW; Leijtens JWA; Polat F; Pronk A; Smits AB; Tuynman JB; Verdaasdonk EGG; Consten ECJ; Hompes R; Sietses C
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Apr; 49(4):730-737. PubMed ID: 36460530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of life and anterior resection syndrome after surgery for mid to low rectal cancer: A cross-sectional study.
Trenti L; Galvez A; Biondo S; Solis A; Vallribera-Valls F; Espin-Basany E; Garcia-Granero A; Kreisler E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1031-1039. PubMed ID: 29665980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abdominoperineal resection and low anterior resection: comparison of long-term oncologic outcome in matched patients with lower rectal cancer.
Kim JC; Yu CS; Lim SB; Kim CW; Kim JH; Kim TW
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2013 Apr; 28(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 23053680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sphincter-preserving effect of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.
Sun L; Zhou J; Ji L; Zhao S; Li R; Fu Y; Wang W; Qian C; Sun Q; Wang D
J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):83. PubMed ID: 38386188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
