BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28197206)

  • 1. Survival after Abdominoperineal and Sphincter-Preserving Resection in Nonmetastatic Rectal Cancer: A Population-Based Time-Trend and Propensity Score-Matched SEER Analysis.
    Warschkow R; Ebinger SM; Brunner W; Schmied BM; Marti L
    Gastroenterol Res Pract; 2017; 2017():6058907. PubMed ID: 28197206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oncologic outcomes for low rectal adenocarcinoma following low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis versus abdominoperineal resection: a National Cancer Database propensity matched analysis.
    Fields AC; Scully RE; Saadat LV; Lu P; Davids JS; Bleday R; Goldberg JE; Melnitchouk N
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2019 May; 34(5):843-848. PubMed ID: 30790033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sphincter-saving surgery versus abdominoperineal resection in low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant treatment with propensity score analysis.
    Shin JK; Kim HC; Lee WY; Yun SH; Cho YB; Huh JW; Park YA
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Apr; 36(4):2623-2630. PubMed ID: 34008108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of life meta-analysis following coloanal anastomosis versus abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer.
    Maguire B; Clancy C; Connelly TM; Mehigan BJ; McCormick P; Altomare DF; Gosselink MP; Larkin JO
    Colorectal Dis; 2022 Jul; 24(7):811-820. PubMed ID: 35194919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative survival risks in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection and sphincter-saving operation for rectal cancer: a 10-year cohort analysis using propensity score matching.
    Lee HG; Kim CW; Lee JL; Yoon YS; Park IJ; Lim SB; Yu CS; Kim JC
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 May; 37(5):989-997. PubMed ID: 35378615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of functional and oncological outcome of conformal sphincter preservation operation, low anterior resection, and abdominoperineal resection in very low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparative cohort study with propensity score matching.
    Sun G; Lou Z; Zheng K; Chen Y; Zhang H; Wen R; Gao X; Meng R; Gong H; Bai C; Furnée EJB; Zhang W
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 May; 408(1):208. PubMed ID: 37222797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Local control of sphincter-preserving procedures and abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced low rectal cancer: Propensity score matched analysis.
    Okamura R; Hida K; Yamaguchi T; Akagi T; Konishi T; Yamamoto M; Ota M; Matoba S; Bando H; Goto S; Sakai Y; Watanabe M; ; Watanabe K; Otsuka K; Takemasa I; Tanaka K; Ikeda M; Matsuda C; Fukuda M; Hasegawa J; Akamoto S; Shiozawa M; Tsuruta A; Akiyoshi T; Kato T; Tsukamoto S; Ito M; Naito M; Kanazawa A; Takahashi T; Ueki T; Hayashi Y; Morita S; Yamaguchi T; Nakanishi M; Hasegawa H; Okamoto K; Teraishi F; Sumi Y; Tashiro J; Yatsuoka T; Nishimura Y; Okita K; Kobatake T; Horie H; Miyakura Y; Ro H; Nagakari K; Hidaka E; Umemoto T; Nishigori H; Murata K; Wakayama F; Makizumi R; Fujii S; Sunami E; Kobayashi H; Nakagawa R; Enomoto T; Ohnuma S; Higashijima J; Ozawa H; Ashida K; Fujita F; Uehara K; Maruyama S; Ohyama M; Yamamoto S; Hinoi T; Yoshimitsu M; Okajima M; Tanimura S; Kawasaki M; Ide Y; Hazama S; Watanabe J; Inagaki D; Toyokawa A
    Ann Gastroenterol Surg; 2017 Sep; 1(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 29863157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of life after coloanal anastomosis and abdominoperineal resection for distal rectal cancers: sphincter preservation vs quality of life.
    Kasparek MS; Hassan I; Cima RR; Larson DR; Gullerud RE; Wolff BG
    Colorectal Dis; 2011 Aug; 13(8):872-7. PubMed ID: 20545966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anastomotic leakage is associated with impaired overall and disease-free survival after curative rectal cancer resection: a propensity score analysis.
    Kulu Y; Tarantio I; Warschkow R; Kny S; Schneider M; Schmied BM; Büchler MW; Ulrich A
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015; 22(6):2059-67. PubMed ID: 25348782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of oncological outcomes between low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study using a multicenter database in Japan.
    Nagano H; Kajitani R; Ohno R; Munechika T; Matsumoto Y; Takahashi H; Aisu N; Kojima D; Yoshimatsu G; Hasegawa S; Kobayashi H; Sugihara K
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Dec; 48(12):2467-2474. PubMed ID: 35752499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coloanal anastomosis or abdominoperineal resection for very low rectal cancer: what will benefit, the surgeon's pride or the patient's quality of life?
    Digennaro R; Tondo M; Cuccia F; Giannini I; Pezzolla F; Rinaldi M; Scala D; Romano G; Altomare DF
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jul; 28(7):949-57. PubMed ID: 23274737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer is facilitated by preoperative chemoradiation and intersphincteric dissection.
    Weiser MR; Quah HM; Shia J; Guillem JG; Paty PB; Temple LK; Goodman KA; Minsky BD; Wong WD
    Ann Surg; 2009 Feb; 249(2):236-42. PubMed ID: 19212176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trends of sphincter-preserving surgeries for low lying rectal cancer: A 20-year experience in China.
    Zheng K; Hu Q; Yu G; Zhou L; Yao Y; Zhou Y; Wang H; Hao L; Yu E; Lou Z; Zhang Y; Qiu H; Meng R; Zhang W
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():996866. PubMed ID: 36568186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Secondary malignancies after rectal cancer resection with and without radiation therapy: A propensity-adjusted, population-based SEER analysis.
    Warschkow R; Güller U; Cerny T; Schmied BM; Plasswilm L; Putora PM
    Radiother Oncol; 2017 Apr; 123(1):139-146. PubMed ID: 28285840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perioperative blood transfusions do not impact overall and disease-free survival after curative rectal cancer resection: a propensity score analysis.
    Warschkow R; Güller U; Köberle D; Müller SA; Steffen T; Thurnheer M; Schmied BM; Tarantino I
    Ann Surg; 2014 Jan; 259(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 23470578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors Associated With Oncologic Outcomes Following Abdominoperineal or Intersphincteric Resection in Patients Treated With Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score Analysis.
    Kim CH; Lee SY; Kim HR; Kim YJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Nov; 94(45):e2060. PubMed ID: 26559314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of three-year oncological results after restorative low anterior resection, non-restorative low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.
    Hol JC; Burghgraef TA; Rutgers MLW; Crolla RMPH; van Geloven NAW; Leijtens JWA; Polat F; Pronk A; Smits AB; Tuynman JB; Verdaasdonk EGG; Consten ECJ; Hompes R; Sietses C
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Apr; 49(4):730-737. PubMed ID: 36460530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of life and anterior resection syndrome after surgery for mid to low rectal cancer: A cross-sectional study.
    Trenti L; Galvez A; Biondo S; Solis A; Vallribera-Valls F; Espin-Basany E; Garcia-Granero A; Kreisler E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1031-1039. PubMed ID: 29665980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abdominoperineal resection and low anterior resection: comparison of long-term oncologic outcome in matched patients with lower rectal cancer.
    Kim JC; Yu CS; Lim SB; Kim CW; Kim JH; Kim TW
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2013 Apr; 28(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 23053680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sphincter-preserving effect of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Sun L; Zhou J; Ji L; Zhao S; Li R; Fu Y; Wang W; Qian C; Sun Q; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):83. PubMed ID: 38386188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.