These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28197725)

  • 1. Schema vs. primitive perceptual grouping: the relative weighting of sequential vs. spatial cues during an auditory grouping task in frogs.
    Farris HE; Ryan MJ
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2017 Mar; 203(3):175-182. PubMed ID: 28197725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of time, space and spectrum on auditory grouping in túngara frogs.
    Farris HE; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2005 Dec; 191(12):1173-83. PubMed ID: 16088388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do frog-eating bats perceptually bind the complex components of frog calls?
    Jones PL; Farris HE; Ryan MJ; Page RA
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2013 Apr; 199(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 23322446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Female preferences for temporal order of call components in the túngara frog: a Bayesian analysis.
    Wilczynski W; Rand SA; Ryan MJ
    Anim Behav; 1999 Oct; 58(4):841-851. PubMed ID: 10512658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural activity patterns in response to interspecific and intraspecific variation in mating calls in the túngara frog.
    Chakraborty M; Mangiamele LA; Burmeister SS
    PLoS One; 2010 Sep; 5(9):e12898. PubMed ID: 20877560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceived Synchrony of Frog Multimodal Signal Components Is Influenced by Content and Order.
    Taylor RC; Page RA; Klein BA; Ryan MJ; Hunter KL
    Integr Comp Biol; 2017 Oct; 57(4):902-909. PubMed ID: 28582535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Arginine vasotocin affects vocal behavior but not selective responses to conspecific calls in male túngara frogs.
    Kime NM; Goutte S; Ryan MJ
    Horm Behav; 2021 Feb; 128():104891. PubMed ID: 33197465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative comparisons of call parameters enable auditory grouping in frogs.
    Farris HE; Ryan MJ
    Nat Commun; 2011 Aug; 2():410. PubMed ID: 21811239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment with arginine vasotocin alters mating calls and decreases call attractiveness in male túngara frogs.
    Kime NM; Whitney TK; Ryan MJ; Rand AS; Marler CA
    Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2010 Jan; 165(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 19576218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolution of calls and auditory tuning in the Physalaemus pustulosus species group.
    Wilczynski W; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Brain Behav Evol; 2001; 58(3):137-51. PubMed ID: 11910171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evoked vocal response in male túngara frogs: pre-existing biases in male responses?
    Ryan MJ; Rand AS
    Anim Behav; 1998 Dec; 56(6):1509-1516. PubMed ID: 9933549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Arginine vasotocin promotes calling behavior and call changes in male túngara frogs.
    Kime NM; Whitney TK; Davis ES; Marler CA
    Brain Behav Evol; 2007; 69(4):254-65. PubMed ID: 17299257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of spatially separated call components on phonotaxis in túngara frogs: evidence for auditory grouping.
    Farris HE; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Brain Behav Evol; 2002; 60(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 12417822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Female Preferences for More Elaborate Signals Are an Emergent Outcome of Male Chorusing Interactions in Túngara Frogs.
    Larter LC; Ryan MJ
    Am Nat; 2024 Jan; 203(1):92-108. PubMed ID: 38207138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finding your mate at a cocktail party: frequency separation promotes auditory stream segregation of concurrent voices in multi-species frog choruses.
    Nityananda V; Bee MA
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(6):e21191. PubMed ID: 21698268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory selectivity for acoustic features that confer species recognition in the tungara frog.
    Mangiamele LA; Burmeister SS
    J Exp Biol; 2011 Sep; 214(Pt 17):2911-8. PubMed ID: 21832134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complexity increases working memory for mating signals.
    Akre KL; Ryan MJ
    Curr Biol; 2010 Mar; 20(6):502-5. PubMed ID: 20206525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. THE SENSORY BASIS OF SEXUAL SELECTION FOR COMPLEX CALLS IN THE TÚNGARA FROG, PHYSALAEMUS PUSTULOSUS (SEXUAL SELECTION FOR SENSORY EXPLOITATION).
    Ryan MJ; Rand AS
    Evolution; 1990 Mar; 44(2):305-314. PubMed ID: 28564368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ecological origins of perceptual grouping principles in the auditory system.
    Młynarski W; McDermott JH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Dec; 116(50):25355-25364. PubMed ID: 31754035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus.
    Ryan MJ; Fox JH; Wilczynski W; Rand AS
    Nature; 1990 Jan; 343(6253):66-7. PubMed ID: 2296291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.