282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28198973)
1. Influence of NiTi alloy on the root canal shaping capabilities of the ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Gold rotary instrument systems.
Duque JA; Vivan RR; Cavenago BC; Amoroso-Silva PA; Bernardes RA; Vasconcelos BC; Duarte MA
J Appl Oral Sci; 2017; 25(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 28198973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the Shaping Characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in Curved Canals.
Gagliardi J; Versiani MA; de Sousa-Neto MD; Plazas-Garzon A; Basrani B
J Endod; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1718-24. PubMed ID: 26321062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study.
Zhao D; Shen Y; Peng B; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1860-4. PubMed ID: 25205262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study.
Drukteinis S; Peciuliene V; Dummer PMH; Hupp J
Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 29858500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of apical transportation and centring ability of five thermally treated NiTi rotary systems.
Pinheiro SR; Alcalde MP; Vivacqua-Gomes N; Bramante CM; Vivan RR; Duarte MAH; Vasconcelos BC
Int Endod J; 2018 Jun; 51(6):705-713. PubMed ID: 29178173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shaping potential of manual NiTi K-File and rotary ProTaper and analyzing the final outcome of shaped canals using CT.
Kakar S; Dhingra A; Sharma H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):451-5. PubMed ID: 24171988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of different angles and reciprocation on the shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments.
Al-Sudani D; Kaabi H; Al Gamdi A; Al Dakheel A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jul; 15(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 25576112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the shaping ability of three nickel-titanium rotary systems in the middle mesial canal of mandibular first molars: an ex vivo study based on 3D printed tooth replicas.
Zhu Q; Liu C; Bai B; Pei F; Tang Y; Song W; Chen X; Gu Y
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):294. PubMed ID: 38431556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Micro-CT evaluation of apical enlargement of molar root canals using rotary or reciprocating heat-treated NiTi instruments.
Pinto JC; Pivoto-João MMB; Espir CG; Ramos MLG; Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM; Tanomaru-Filho M
J Appl Oral Sci; 2019 Aug; 27():e20180689. PubMed ID: 31411264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of air-driven vs electric torque control motors on canal centering ability by ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
Zarei M; Javidi M; Erfanian M; Lomee M; Afkhami F
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 23579897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of dentin volume removal and centralization of the root canal after shaping with the ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Gold, and One-Curve instruments using micro-CT.
Yalniz H; Koohnavard M; Oncu A; Celikten B; Orhan AI; Orhan K
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2021; 15(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 33927841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23321246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microtomography-based comparison of reciprocating single-file F2 ProTaper technique versus rotary full sequence.
Paqué F; Zehnder M; De-Deus G
J Endod; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1394-7. PubMed ID: 21924189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of centring ability and transportation between four nickel titanium instrumentation techniques by micro-computed tomography.
Saberi N; Patel S; Mannocci F
Int Endod J; 2017 Jun; 50(6):595-603. PubMed ID: 27159500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Impact of TruNatomy and ProTaper Gold Instruments on the Preservation of the Periradicular Dentin and on the Enlargement of the Apical Canal of Mandibular Molars.
Silva EJNL; Lima CO; Barbosa AFA; Lopes RT; Sassone LM; Versiani MA
J Endod; 2022 May; 48(5):650-658. PubMed ID: 35181453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness of TRUShape and ProTaper Next systems in curved root canals using micro-computed tomography.
Elnaghy AM; Al-Dharrab AA; Abbas HM; Elsaka SE
Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 27669727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Root Canal Shaping Effect of Instruments with Offset Mass of Rotation in the Mandibular First Molar: A Micro-computed Tomographic Study.
Kyaw Moe MM; Ha JH; Jin MU; Kim YK; Kim SK
J Endod; 2018 May; 44(5):822-827. PubMed ID: 29398088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
