These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28199179)

  • 1. Experienced Probabilities Increase Understanding of Diagnostic Test Results in Younger and Older Adults.
    Armstrong B; Spaniol J
    Med Decis Making; 2017 Aug; 37(6):670-679. PubMed ID: 28199179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effect of Information Formats and Incidental Affect on Prior and Posterior Probability Judgments.
    Armstrong BA; Sparrow EP; Spaniol J
    Med Decis Making; 2020 Jul; 40(5):680-692. PubMed ID: 32659157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Natural frequencies help older adults and people with low numeracy to evaluate medical screening tests.
    Galesic M; Gigerenzer G; Straubinger N
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(3):368-71. PubMed ID: 19129155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does exposure to simulated patient cases improve accuracy of clinicians' predictive value estimates of diagnostic test results? A within-subjects experiment at St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
    Armstrong B; Spaniol J; Persaud N
    BMJ Open; 2018 Feb; 8(2):e019241. PubMed ID: 29440215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Communicating Relative Risk Changes with Baseline Risk: Presentation Format and Numeracy Matter.
    Bodemer N; Meder B; Gigerenzer G
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):615-26. PubMed ID: 24803429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving Understanding of Diagnostic Test Outcomes.
    Talboy AN; Schneider SL
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Jul; 38(5):573-583. PubMed ID: 29608866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [How can one improve the understanding and communication of the importance of medical test results?].
    Hoffrage U; Kurzenhäuser S; Gigerenzer G
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2000 Oct; 94(9):713-9. PubMed ID: 11127778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The experience-based format of probability improves probability estimates: The moderating role of individual differences in numeracy.
    Traczyk J; Sobkow A; Matukiewicz A; Petrova D; Garcia-Retamero R
    Int J Psychol; 2020 Apr; 55(2):273-281. PubMed ID: 30690731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing the framing effect in older and younger adults by encouraging analytic processing.
    Thomas AK; Millar PR
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2012 Mar; 67(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 21964668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The accuracy of patients' judgments of disease probability and test sensitivity and specificity.
    Hamm RM; Smith SL
    J Fam Pract; 1998 Jul; 47(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 9673608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comprehension of Internet-based numeric cancer information by older adults.
    Donelle L; Hoffman-Goetz L; Gatobu S; Arocha JF
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2009 Dec; 34(4):209-24. PubMed ID: 19919298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Presenting Numeric Information with Percentages and Descriptive Risk Labels: A Randomized Trial.
    Sinayev A; Peters E; Tusler M; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Nov; 35(8):937-47. PubMed ID: 25952743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aiding Risk Information learning through Simulated Experience (ARISE): A Comparison of the Communication of Screening Test Information in Explicit and Simulated Experience Formats.
    Wegier P; Armstrong BA; Shaffer VA
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Apr; 39(3):196-207. PubMed ID: 30819033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual representation of statistical information improves diagnostic inferences in doctors and their patients.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Hoffrage U
    Soc Sci Med; 2013 Apr; 83():27-33. PubMed ID: 23465201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving Diagnostic Efficiency with Frequency Double-Trees and Frequency Nets in Bayesian Reasoning.
    Kunzelmann AK; Binder K; Fischer MR; Reincke M; Braun LT; Schmidmaier R
    MDM Policy Pract; 2022; 7(1):23814683221086623. PubMed ID: 35321028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How should risk be communicated to children: a cross-sectional study comparing different formats of probability information.
    Ulph F; Townsend E; Glazebrook C
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2009 Jun; 9():26. PubMed ID: 19500337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of descriptive and experiential information in decision making by young and older adults.
    Hess TM; O'Brien EL; Growney CM; Hafer JG
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2018 Jul; 25(4):500-519. PubMed ID: 28492092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence for an elders' advantage in the naive product usability judgments of older and younger adults.
    Stephens EC; Carswell CM; Schumacher MM
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(3):422-33. PubMed ID: 17063959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measures of Bayesian Reasoning Performance on 'Normal' and 'Natural' Frequency Tasks.
    Stock R; Fisk JE; Montgomery C
    J Gen Psychol; 2016; 143(3):185-214. PubMed ID: 27410053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sequentially simulated outcomes: kind experience versus nontransparent description.
    Hogarth RM; Soyer E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Aug; 140(3):434-63. PubMed ID: 21639669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.