These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28201761)

  • 21. Drugged Driving in Wisconsin: Oral Fluid Versus Blood.
    Edwards LD; Smith KL; Savage T
    J Anal Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 41(6):523-529. PubMed ID: 28830121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of RapiTest with Emit d.a.u. and GC-MS for the analysis of drugs in urine.
    Korte T; Pykäläinen J; Lillsunde P; Seppälä T
    J Anal Toxicol; 1997; 21(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 9013293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of a direct high-capacity target screening approach for urine drug testing using liquid chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry.
    Saleh A; Stephanson NN; Granelli I; Villén T; Beck O
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2012 Nov; 909():6-13. PubMed ID: 23153637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detection of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol and amphetamine-type stimulants in oral fluid using the Rapid Stat point-of-collection drug-testing device.
    Röhrich J; Zörntlein S; Becker J; Urban R
    J Anal Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 34(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 20406540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Performance of techniques used to detect drugs of abuse in urine: study based on external quality assessment.
    Wilson JF; Williams J; Walker G; Toseland PA; Smith BL; Richens A; Burnett D
    Clin Chem; 1991 Mar; 37(3):442-7. PubMed ID: 2004454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. False-negative results in the immunoassay analysis of drugs of abuse: can adulterants be detected by sample check test?
    Matriciani B; Huppertz B; Keller R; Weiskirchen R
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2018 May; 55(3):348-354. PubMed ID: 28728424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Confirmation of marijuana, cocaine, morphine, codeine, amphetamine, methamphetamine, phencyclidine by GC/MS in urine following immunoassay screening.
    Mulé SJ; Casella GA
    J Anal Toxicol; 1988; 12(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 3379919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A field test of substance use screening devices as part of routine drunk-driving spot detection operating procedures in South Africa.
    Matzopoulos R; Lasarow A; Bowman B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Oct; 59():118-24. PubMed ID: 23770390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Usefulness of roadside urine drug screening in drivers suspected of driving under the influence of drugs (DUID).
    Raes E; Verstraete AG
    J Anal Toxicol; 2005 Oct; 29(7):632-6. PubMed ID: 16419392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Performance evaluation of on-site oral fluid drug screening devices in normal police procedure in Germany.
    Musshoff F; Hokamp EG; Bott U; Madea B
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():120-4. PubMed ID: 24699311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Screening of several drugs of abuse in Italian workplace drug testing: performance comparisons of on-site screening tests and a fluorescence polarization immunoassay-based device.
    Basilicata P; Pieri M; Settembre V; Galdiero A; Della Casa E; Acampora A; Miraglia N
    Anal Chem; 2011 Nov; 83(22):8566-74. PubMed ID: 21992470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Drug screening of whole blood by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
    Oiestad EL; Johansen U; Oiestad AM; Christophersen AS
    J Anal Toxicol; 2011 Jun; 35(5):280-93. PubMed ID: 21619723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. External quality assessment of techniques for the detection of drugs of abuse in urine.
    Wilson JF; Smith BL; Toseland PA; Williams J; Burnett D; Hirst AD; Watson ID; Horn AN
    Ann Clin Biochem; 1994 Jul; 31 ( Pt 4)():335-42. PubMed ID: 7979098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A novel immunoassay for quantitative drug abuse screening in serum.
    Schumacher S; Seitz H
    J Immunol Methods; 2016 Sep; 436():34-40. PubMed ID: 27343723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Performance characteristics of selected immunoassays for preliminary test of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, methamphetamine, and related drugs in urine specimens.
    Hsu J; Liu C; Liu CP; Tsay WI; Li JH; Lin DL; Liu RH
    J Anal Toxicol; 2003 Oct; 27(7):471-8. PubMed ID: 14607002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the integrated E-Z split key(®) cup II for rapid detection of twelve drug classes in urine.
    Greene DN; Lehman CM; McMillin GA
    J Anal Toxicol; 2011 Jan; 35(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 21219703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The analytical performance of six urine drug screens on cobas 6000 and ARCHITECT i2000 compared to LC-MS/MS gold standard.
    Abou El Hassan M; Colantonio D; Likhodii S; Nassar BA
    Clin Biochem; 2021 Jul; 93():99-103. PubMed ID: 33844982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS method for direct analysis of drugs of abuse in oral fluid for DUID assessment.
    Strano-Rossi S; Anzillotti L; Castrignanò E; Felli M; Serpelloni G; Mollica R; Chiarotti M
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2011 Aug; 401(2):609-24. PubMed ID: 21674163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimization of cloned enzyme donor immunoassay cut-offs for drugs of abuse in post-mortem whole blood.
    Pelletti G; Rossi F; Garagnani M; Barone R; Roffi R; Fais P; Pelotti S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jul; 312():110291. PubMed ID: 32353744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analytic performance of immunoassays for drugs of abuse below established cutoff values.
    Luzzi VI; Saunders AN; Koenig JW; Turk J; Lo SF; Garg UC; Dietzen DJ
    Clin Chem; 2004 Apr; 50(4):717-22. PubMed ID: 14764642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.