320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28202011)
1. A comparison of analytic approaches for individual patient data meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
Thomas D; Platt R; Benedetti A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):28. PubMed ID: 28202011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data.
Ju K; Lin L; Chu H; Cheng LL; Xu C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 32539721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of computational methods for aggregate data meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
Zhao Y; Khan B; Negeri ZF
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 May; 24(1):111. PubMed ID: 38730436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analysis of binary outcomes via generalized linear mixed models: a simulation study.
Bakbergenuly I; Kulinskaya E
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):70. PubMed ID: 29973146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Generalized linear mixed models for binary data: are matching results from penalized quasi-likelihood and numerical integration less biased?
Benedetti A; Platt R; Atherton J
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e84601. PubMed ID: 24416249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Individual participant data meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: A comparison of approaches for specifying and estimating one-stage models.
Legha A; Riley RD; Ensor J; Snell KIE; Morris TP; Burke DL
Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(29):4404-4420. PubMed ID: 30101507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modelling spatial disease rates using maximum likelihood.
Leroux BG
Stat Med; 2000 Sep 15-30; 19(17-18):2321-32. PubMed ID: 10960856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of one-stage vs two-stage individual patient data meta-analysis methods: A simulation study.
Kontopantelis E
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):417-430. PubMed ID: 29786975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An assessment of estimation methods for generalized linear mixed models with binary outcomes.
Capanu M; Gönen M; Begg CB
Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(26):4550-66. PubMed ID: 23839712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. One-stage individual participant data meta-analysis models for continuous and binary outcomes: Comparison of treatment coding options and estimation methods.
Riley RD; Legha A; Jackson D; Morris TP; Ensor J; Snell KIE; White IR; Burke DL
Stat Med; 2020 Aug; 39(19):2536-2555. PubMed ID: 32394498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating the variance for heterogeneity in arm-based network meta-analysis.
Piepho HP; Madden LV; Roger J; Payne R; Williams ER
Pharm Stat; 2018 May; 17(3):264-277. PubMed ID: 29676023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Empirical Bayes estimation of random effects parameters in mixed effects logistic regression models.
Ten Have TR; Localio AR
Biometrics; 1999 Dec; 55(4):1022-9. PubMed ID: 11315043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Statistical approaches to identify subgroups in meta-analysis of individual participant data: a simulation study.
Belias M; Rovers MM; Reitsma JB; Debray TPA; IntHout J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Sep; 19(1):183. PubMed ID: 31477023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the Estimation of POD and LOD of Qualitative Microbiological Assays from a Multi-Laboratory Validation Study.
Wang SS; Ihrie J
J AOAC Int; 2022 Mar; 105(2):641-647. PubMed ID: 34623395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Likelihood-based random-effects meta-analysis with few studies: empirical and simulation studies.
Seide SE; Röver C; Friede T
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 30634920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Poisson Multilevel Models with Small Samples.
McNeish D
Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(3):444-455. PubMed ID: 30663387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating individualized treatment effects using an individual participant data meta-analysis.
Bouvier F; Chaimani A; Peyrot E; Gueyffier F; Grenet G; Porcher R
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):74. PubMed ID: 38528447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Power difference in a χ
Miller ML; Roe DJ; Hu C; Bell ML
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):50. PubMed ID: 32122312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mixed effects versus fixed effects modelling of binary data with inter-subject variability.
Murphy V; Dunne A
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2005 Apr; 32(2):245-60. PubMed ID: 16283537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
