These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28203569)

  • 21. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
    Baysal A; Uysal T
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Growth and treatment changes in patients treated with a headgear-activator appliance.
    Bendeus M; Hägg U; Rabie B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Apr; 121(4):376-84. PubMed ID: 11997762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
    Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cephalometric changes during headgear-reactivator treatment.
    Remmelink HJ; Tan BG
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Dec; 13(6):466-70. PubMed ID: 1817072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes with cervical headgear and mandibular protraction appliance therapy in the treatment of Class II malocclusions.
    Siqueira DF; de Almeira RR; Janson G; Brandão AG; Coelho Filho CM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):447.e21-30. PubMed ID: 17418708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effects of Twin Blocks: a prospective controlled study.
    Lund DI; Sandler PJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jan; 113(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 9457025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Barbosa LAG; Araujo E; Behrents RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):914-920. PubMed ID: 28457269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
    Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Does mandibular advancement with clear aligners have the same skeletal and dentoalveolar effects as traditional functional appliances?
    Wu Y; Yu Q; Xia Y; Wang B; Chen S; Gu K; Zhang B; Zhu M
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Feb; 23(1):65. PubMed ID: 36732724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Skeletal and dental changes following the use of the Frankel functional regulator.
    Rushforth CD; Gordon PH; Aird JC
    Br J Orthod; 1999 Jun; 26(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 10420247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of the dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes with the cervical headgear and Jones Jig followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study.
    Fontes FPH; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del-Castillo A; Patel MP; Freitas MR; Henriques JFC; Janson G
    Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):424-435. PubMed ID: 32278665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative evaluation of a new removable Jasper Jumper functional appliance vs an activator-headgear combination.
    Sari Z; Goyenc Y; Doruk C; Usumez S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 12828437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Management of severe Class II division 1 malocclusion: a case report.
    Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Sundari KK
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 22372276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Twin-block and mandibular anterior repositioning appliances effects in Class II malocclusion correction.
    Bastiani C; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Chiqueto K; Castanha Henriques JF; Janson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Feb; 163(2):181-190. PubMed ID: 36202696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A cephalometric investigation of the effects of the Elastic Bite-block in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Erverdi N; Ozkan G
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):375-84. PubMed ID: 8529750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition.
    Wieslander L
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Jul; 86(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 6588755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Classification and treatment of Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Cassidy SE; Jackson SR; Turpin DL; Ramsay DS; Spiekerman C; Huang GJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):443-51. PubMed ID: 24703282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
    Freitas MR; Lima DV; Freitas KM; Janson G; Henriques JF
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.