281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28204270)
21. Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study.
Lee YJ; Park JT; Cha JY
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 26321338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Chinese Class III patients.
Chew MT
Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):959-63. PubMed ID: 16448238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Soft-tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with mandibular setback osteotomy.
Gjørup H; Athanasiou AE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):312-23. PubMed ID: 1927981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Facial soft-tissue shape changes after fixed edgewise treatment with premolar extraction in individual artificial-intelligence-classified facial profile patterns.
Tanikawa C; Tan TJ; Takada K
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):740. PubMed ID: 38937790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Soft tissue stability in segmental distraction of the anterior mandibular alveolar process. A 2-year follow-up.
Joss CU; Triaca A; Antonini M; Kiliaridis S; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 41(5):560-5. PubMed ID: 22204924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Advancement genioplasty in Class I patients: predictability and stability of facial profile changes.
Erbe C; Mulié RM; Ruf S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 40(11):1258-62. PubMed ID: 21632211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Surgical prediction of skeletal and soft tissue changes in treatment of Class II.
de Lira Ade L; de Moura WL; Artese F; Bittencourt MA; Nojima LI
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 41(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 23201327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Factors affecting changes in soft tissue profile after various treatment modalities for skeletal Class II malocclusion: A cross-sectional study.
Khan AR; Fida M; Sukhia RH
Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 31257136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Three-dimensional study of facial soft tissue changes in patients with skeletal Class
Shi Y; Shang H; Tian L; Bai S; Liu W; Liu Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 May; 32(5):612-616. PubMed ID: 29806352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Total Mandibular subapical osteotomy to correct Class II with inferior alveolar retrusion.
Konopnicki S; Nicot R; Schlund M; Ferri J
Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):114-122. PubMed ID: 30772352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Soft tissue changes of patients with skeletal class II malocclusion after orthodontic and surgical treatments].
Chen K; Zheng Y; Wang X
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Feb; 20(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 12593199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Factors influencing soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
Maetevorakul S; Viteporn S
Prog Orthod; 2016; 17():13. PubMed ID: 27135067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mandibular setback osteotomy: facial soft tissue behavior and possibility to improve the accuracy of the soft tissue profile prediction with the use of a computerized cephalometric program: Quick Ceph Image Pro: v. 2.5.
Chunmaneechote P; Friede H
Clin Orthod Res; 1999 May; 2(2):85-98. PubMed ID: 10534984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Soft tissue response to mandibular advancement and genioplasty.
Ewing M; Ross RB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jun; 101(6):550-5. PubMed ID: 1598895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Soft tissue adaptability to hard tissues in facial profiles.
Kasai K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):674-84. PubMed ID: 9637571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sagittal lip positions in different skeletal malocclusions: a cephalometric analysis.
Joshi M; Wu LP; Maharjan S; Regmi MR
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():8. PubMed ID: 26061982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The influence of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on submental-cervical aesthetics.
Soydan SS; Uckan S; Ustdal A; Bayram B; Bayrak B
J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Nov; 41(11):816-21. PubMed ID: 24946129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery.
Ko EW; Huang CS; Chen YR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2201-9. PubMed ID: 19761914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Short- and long-term skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement surgery.
Eggensperger N; Smolka K; Luder J; Iizuka T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 16344217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Five-year outcome and predictability of soft tissue profiles when wire or rigid fixation is used in mandibular advancement surgery.
Dolce C; Hatch JP; Van Sickels JE; Rugh JD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Sep; 124(3):249-56; quiz 340. PubMed ID: 12970658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
